Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Its time for Chris Darke to go!

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Its time for Chris Darke to go!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th Mar 2001, 19:46
  #21 (permalink)  
Genghis McCann
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Let us be very wary here. I am not foolish enough to think that BALPA offer a panacea for all ills but they are the best we have. Let us not turn on someone who represents us and publicly vilify him in this manner. If we have informed and legitimate complaints about his performance this is not the place to air them - write to him direct.

Washing our dirty linen in public will only encourage our employers to stand up all the more to BALPA and will be counterproductive. And by the way I have no office of any kind - I just pay my 1% like everyone else.
 
Old 26th Mar 2001, 20:00
  #22 (permalink)  
willoman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Hear Hear ! Complain by personal letter, not by public execution.
 
Old 26th Mar 2001, 20:32
  #23 (permalink)  
Hot Wings
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Genghis - the brutal truth is that yes, they may be "the best we have" but they are simply not good enough anymore. We pay our 1% and, therefore, we have a say in the direction of our union.

As one PPruner mentioned earlier, how many times have we been informed of serious issues requiring support but then we never hear anything about what transpires.

It is time to forget about this typical "Dunkirk spirit/ mustn't grumble" British attitude. CD works for us and should be held accountable to us.
 
Old 26th Mar 2001, 20:59
  #24 (permalink)  
Arkroyal
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
fish

I remain a member only because of legal cover, and that I would feel very guilty to take the benefits(?) without contributing.

Hot Wings is right, however. We need to employ a hard nosed assassin who works hard for US and who does not cosy up to the management.
 
Old 26th Mar 2001, 21:11
  #25 (permalink)  
StressFree
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

For me the 1% is for the legal cover, we all know what is the first enquiry after an incident - who's to blame?
Thats not a strange reason to be in a union which offers help in a crisis, thats good enough for me.



------------------
'Keep the Stress Down'
 
Old 26th Mar 2001, 21:13
  #26 (permalink)  
Scimitar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I feel sure that, by now, someone will have drawn Chris Darke's attention to this thread. It would be nice if he were to offer some reassurance to the many unhappy Balpa members who have expressed their dissatisfaction here. Some indication that the "suits" at New Road are actually concerned about the views and worries of their members (as opposed to just the level of membership) would come as a pleasant surprise.
 
Old 26th Mar 2001, 21:51
  #27 (permalink)  
DrSyn
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I agree with Ghengis McC and willoman with regard to excercising caution. It will hardly improve New Road's opinion of this site to vilify them here.

Basil, if I may quote from the Chairman's letter to members, dated 26 June 92, "You will by now be aware of the result of the ballot for the post of General Secretary and the election of Chris Darke, ...." (my emphasis). It is very common for a whole range of organisations to have paid positions to which the appointee must be elected by the members. Following election, normal employment regulations then apply, subject to the term of appointment which, in the case of GS, is 5 years,

Effendi, Mr Darke has never been a pilot. Most of his career has been devoted to being a professional union official.
 
Old 26th Mar 2001, 23:24
  #28 (permalink)  
CQ
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Arrow

I remember when his past experience was listed, being a former member of the Communist Party, I thought then, what the hell is Balpa doing? We'd moved on in leaps and bounds with management and employee relationships by the early 90's. Well that may have been the case in my previous company. Apparently not in the Shell Suit outfit, it's just like going back to the very dark Victorian age. They have an unbelievably dictatorial bullying management directed from above. It seems the style in other accountant lead airlines today as well. Chris Darke did a deal with the Shell Suit outfit in order to gain their pilots onto Balpa books. The ex Leisure guys have paid for it since and still are. Despite TUPE employment regulations, the ex Leisure terms and conditions have been and still are being eroded by the bean counters of the parent company. There still is no recognition agreement despite the overwhelming vote for Balpa since last September. At the end of the day Chris Darkes' Balpa is not on ours or anyone else's side other than his own. He appears to be a political animal no better than bottom line airline management who think and work in a similar manner. Balpa, lead by Chris Darke, is a greedy money grabbing organisation that preys on our legalistic vulnerability in this litigious business we are in today. My vote is....GO

[This message has been edited by PPRuNe Towers (edited 26 March 2001).]
 
Old 26th Mar 2001, 23:32
  #29 (permalink)  
knows
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Prior to XF/O 1-11's posting I was getting ready to defend Mr Darke. You know - saying something like " we do really need to pay £75 K or more to get anyone with credibility, integrity, determinartion and polished negotiating experience."

BUT seeing the size of his increases when we end up with inflation plus 0.2 percent (whatever!) makes me see red!
 
Old 26th Mar 2001, 23:40
  #30 (permalink)  
Effendi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Mr Darke's a good socialist! Cares about others, not his pay packet.
 
Old 27th Mar 2001, 00:04
  #31 (permalink)  
Three Percent
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Angry

It would seem only fair that his salary should be no more than the mean of which BALPA have been able to negotiate for its members. Like so many others my 1% goes on legal insurance.
 
Old 27th Mar 2001, 10:04
  #32 (permalink)  
dallas dude
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post


Folks,

Far be it from me to criticise Dark Chris's salary. Good luck to him.

Doesn't seem to be helping you get what you all deserve, though. Think about it, where are BALPA's priorities?

Why would you NOT want an airline pilot running a pilot's union? Surely you'd all want someone who could confidently say they'd been there, done that and got the T-shirt.

Maybe it's time to pull your heads out of that brown cloud.

dd
 
Old 27th Mar 2001, 11:38
  #33 (permalink)  
The Skylord
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

The IPA is currently making preparations to form a legally registered Union. Soon there will be a choice.....
 
Old 27th Mar 2001, 13:21
  #34 (permalink)  
knows
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Angry

Sklord - let me ask you a question. "If the IPA were an alternative - do you think that would strengthen or weaken BALPA?"

DD - I quite agree with you. However some BALPA members are surprised that he seems to be proficient at negotiating increases in his own pay - wheras BALPA have failed in recent years to get significant increases for members.
(For the record, my own view is that this "failure" is an outcome of a lack of any real determination within the pilot workforce.
Eg we are all familiar with the views of some pprune posters; who beleive that we are simply not worth any more pay. This is supplemented by those idiots who actually beleive that; some airlines (low cost ones?) can't afford to pay above inflation increases!!!)
 
Old 27th Mar 2001, 16:37
  #35 (permalink)  
The Skylord
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

knows
I would think it will weaken BALPA unfortunately.
However there is no question that an awful lot of non BA pilots will not join BALPA because of a perceived pro BA pilots stance and BALPA's poor record when it comes to non BA matters (Danair, flagging out, BA using US 737 pilots, etc.)
I regret any weakening of BALPA but surely a choice of Unions will hopefully increase the total number of pilots who join one.
If there was no demand for a choice and everyone was happy with BALPA then this situation would not have arisen - and to some extent it is a situation that CD has allowed to come about.
 
Old 27th Mar 2001, 16:53
  #36 (permalink)  
faq
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Talking flagging out skylord; months ago I sent a letter to Chris Darke regarding flagging out at Leeds and Teeside by Skyservice UK.

I never received a reply.
 
Old 27th Mar 2001, 17:37
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: U K
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The IPA can never be a viable alternative to BALPA due its total lack of resources. Say 1600 full members at £60 per year is only £96000. That's hardly enough to sustain an office and secretary let alone be a player on the world stage.

At least I get a copy of the BALPA accounts each year. I haven't received any from the IPA since I joined.

Many UK pilots, like me, are members of both organisations. Anybody who lobbies on our behalf has got to be good. No one else is going to do it thats for sure.
Boeingman is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2001, 19:29
  #38 (permalink)  
Hew Jampton
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

"Why would you NOT want an airline pilot running a pilot's union? Surely you'd all want someone who could confidently say they'd been there, done that and got the T-shirt."

CD is the General Secretary, a paid employee; he doesn't (or shouldn't) "run" BALPA. That is done by a National Executive Committee and its Chairman, all elected and all flightcrew.

 
Old 27th Mar 2001, 20:15
  #39 (permalink)  
kippa
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

What should he do then?

What does he do?
 
Old 27th Mar 2001, 20:32
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: U K
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

He does what the NEC instructs him to do while they are off doing the day job and then reports back.

He uses his political and industrial contacts to lobby on our behalf and to influence decisions made in the Industry and by Goverment that affect all of us. He has to think stategically i.e. about long term trends.

He is up for election soon and if another candidate is put up or the current incumbant finds a better job or retires then there will be a choice.
Boeingman is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.