Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Qantas investigated after filling crew oxygen tanks with nitrogen!

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Qantas investigated after filling crew oxygen tanks with nitrogen!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Dec 2007, 22:14
  #1 (permalink)  

aka Capt PPRuNe
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 1995
Location: UK
Posts: 4,541
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Qantas investigated after filling crew oxygen tanks with nitrogen!

"Probe after Qantas pumps wrong gas into jets (The Age)"
Danny is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 11:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brum
Posts: 852
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From Avweb
Nige321 is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 11:14
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are the connectors the same?

Can't believe.
hetfield is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 11:50
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hetfield

The connectors are different, but according to the article on Avweb (linked previously) the crew changed the connectors, apparently without thinking about it, from the nitrogen type to the oxygen type when they discovered the connectors on their new 'cart' didnt fit...how idiotic can you get?!
perkin is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 12:23
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Norfolk U.K.
Age: 68
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's unbelievable (and rather frightening) to think that with all the Quality assurance systems and paperwork trails involved in aviation that something as potentially life threatening could happen. Perhaps the contractors involved though that since nitrogen is the main component in air, then it would do the same job as oxygen? Err maybe not....
The Flying Pram is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 12:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 724
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That surely must be (unintentional) gross negligence. It certainly is more criminal than speeding, through a red light, with your headlights off.

But...Does this mean that the tyres are filled with oxygen? That could be "nice" as well.
fox niner is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 12:42
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Let's get off the blame game and criminality discussions and into the training compentence (are these guys certified?) and quality assurance arena.

How often are these systems used? How long could this problem have existed?
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 13:00
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,660
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by The Flying Pram
.... with all the Quality assurance systems and paperwork trails involved in aviation that something as potentially life threatening could happen....
Anyone who has ever worked with Quality Assurance, ISO-9000, and all that stuff will be only too aware that, alas, it does little in terms of avoiding blunders (which are generally prevented by commonsense anyway) and a great deal towards keeping paperpushers in jobs.
WHBM is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 13:12
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Chester
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aviation's excellent safety record has only been achieved because people are willing to admit their mistakes without fear of the Police knocking on their door.

As soon as you introduce phrases such as 'criminal negligence' for what passes as human error - or even human stupidity - our industry will move backwards. It's why we have ASRs, MORs and safety bulletins - to learn from others' mistakes and to publicise our own errors without fear of prosecution.

The system seems to have worked in this case. Introduce prosecution and you introduce cover-up and conspiracy.
Desperate is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 14:06
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's happened before
barit1 is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 14:19
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: U.K.
Age: 46
Posts: 3,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whilst this is a pretty massive blunder, the point about having a "no blame" culture is a very valid one.

Having said that though, what sort of dumbass would change the connectors over without checking?

Luckily this incident didin't lead to any further problems or disasters, but if it had someone would definately be getting their collar felt.
Say again s l o w l y is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 15:11
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oxygen fittings on Boeing Aircraft are left-handed threads, whilst Airbus use right-hand threads, the aircraft carries an adapter to fit the oxygen rigs! Murphy proof??

A sign to employers to ensure that staff need to be adequately trained and strictly from Aircraft recognised backgrounds for the degradation of this standard is becoming more common place.
Beeline is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 15:46
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Georgia, USA
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Beeline,

Nothing can be made "Murphy Proof" only "Murphy Resistant".
glhcarl is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 16:01
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I understand it if you breath pure nitrogen you might not notice untill too late. No CO2 in your lungs so it doesn't feel like you are suffocating.
cwatters is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 16:12
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 2,527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree that talk of criminal charges should be silenced. I'm a firm believer in the no-blame culture. Everyone makes mistakes. Bravo Zulu to Qantas for alerting other carriers and openly admitting it, so that lives can be spared and perhaps more importantly, a lesson is learned.

Perhaps the contractors involved though that since nitrogen is the main component in air, then it would do the same job as oxygen?

Flying Pram, funny comment, but it could well be true. I met a guy a few weeks ago that didn't know CO2 was toxic if the room is filled with it. How does the saying go, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing????

Does this mean that the tires are filled with oxygen? That could be "nice" as well.

Check Airman is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 16:53
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hunched over a keyboard
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I recall reading a similar story about a Hunter pilot in the RAF suffering hypoxia - so he switched from airmix to 100% but he was getting 100% Nitrogen and it just made the problem worse.

He just had enough wits left to descend below 10,000' and remove his mask to breath ambient air.
moggiee is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 17:19
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Australia
Age: 67
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Opposite thing happened in the RNZAF in the 70's.
A4 Skyhawk Gun Nitrogen Accumulator filled with Oxygen.
Resulting fire nearly cost the aircraft.
Cause: Nitrogen Bottles all black, Oxygen Bottles black with a blue green top?
Battered oxy bottles had most of the blue green paint missing.
Cure: Stores not to accept gas bottles unless colour coding paint in pristine condition.
R J Kinloch is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 17:55
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: uk
Posts: 951
Received 18 Likes on 12 Posts
Perhaps the contractors involved though that since nitrogen is the main component in air,
Did I miss those parts of the linked reports that said the error was made by contractors rather than permanent QF staff?

A sign to employers to ensure that staff need to be adequately trained and strictly from Aircraft recognised backgrounds for the degradation of this standard is becoming more common place.
You would think that such checks are standard, mandatory even. You would be wrong, in maintenance organisations in pretty much every part of the world, including EU and USA, with a few, very few, notable exceptions.
old,not bold is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 18:40
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Seattle
Posts: 3,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I understand it if you breath pure nitrogen you might not notice untill too late. No CO2 in your lungs so it doesn't feel like you are suffocating.
OTOH, a "top off" of the O2 with N2 would likely cause NO problems...

First, free air is 70%+ nitrogen; nitrogen is not inherently poisonous.

Second, even at altitude we can breathe easily with less than 100% O2. Only in extreme cases and/or for prolonged periods at high altitude would the effects of an N2 mixture be noticeable.

As an example, say a system that is normally at 1200 psi goes below the 900 psi minimum, and needs to be topped off. Now it is about 25% N2 and 75% O2. There is over 3 times as much O2 in the mix than in free air, so the user would get a sea-level partial pressure of O2 to above 20,000' cabin altitude (using the guide that 18,000' ~~ half standard atmospheric pressure), and a breathable mixture above that.

So, while it IS a gross error on the part of the people who did it, it is NOT necessarily an immediately critical problem unless they were filling EMPTY O2 systems -- not just "topping off" as described in the article.
Intruder is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2007, 19:50
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do belive in some countries Gaseous crew o2 recharging is not permitted, the whole bottle assy is replaced and refilled, does anybody know if and where this is practiced??
Beeline is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.