Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Atlas Tail Strike

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Atlas Tail Strike

Old 18th Sep 2007, 17:59
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Göttingen
Age: 41
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rubik101,

Wouldn't perhaps a wrong positive indication happen much more often than a real tailscrape that would be dangerous, but not be noticed in the plane?
(I'm not a pilot. Just a thought.)
Lexif is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2007, 18:06
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Thailand
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Modern technical reliability.

In answer to Lexif's query; No more than false engine fire alarms, or open cargo or entrance doors, or failed hydraulic or electric systems or false airspeed or altitude indications and so on and so on. What makes you think that indication systems on aircraft are less reliable than anywhere else?
Does your TV switch itself on at random?
Does your door open light in your car come on as you drive along the road?
Does your oven switch itself on or off when you least expect it?
Enough?
rubik101 is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2007, 01:19
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Göttingen
Age: 41
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The underlying thought was just that it appears to me that tailstrikes that are not felt in the cockpit or at least the cabin are much rarer occurances than other safety problems for which warning systems have been integrated in aircraft - at least tailstrikes that were undetected, but endangered the safety of the flight or even caused crashes. I don't know if that's true, I just had the impression and wanted to introduce that angle into the discussion. And I surely don't want to be on the flight that makes a precedence.

I've surely heard of a lot more safety landings because of the failure of gear proximity switches or other devices that created an "gear unsafe" warning of sorts than of real landings with landing gears that failed in some way. (Thanks to the media that make a live TV event out of every airliner circeling to burn of fuel for an emergency landing. ) So I feel that even these important sensors fail a lot. On the other hand, I don't know how often (cargo) door sensors have prevented accidents, as the problems they are inteded to detect surely happen most of the time on the ground, and in flight failures only seldomly make the news...and cargo doors that open for real in flight are even more rare.

I know it's cynical, but this question surely turns up when designing a tailstrike warning system for an airliner. I would sure feel better if such a system was an option on the airliner I'm flying on as a passenger, though.

Just out of humble curiosity...when was the last time an airliner had an accident that could have been prevented by an indication in the cockpit?

Last edited by Lexif; 19th Sep 2007 at 01:30.
Lexif is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2007, 17:42
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UK
Age: 81
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Jumping to assumptions

A question of the saucepan calling the kettle black perhaps!
hautemude is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.