Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

KLM nose gear stuck down

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

KLM nose gear stuck down

Old 7th Aug 2007, 21:50
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: EU
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whatever it was, it took some time to fix; somebody on airliners.net posted this:
The aircraft, of of KLM's B744 full passenger versions, registered PH-BFG, took off from SFO and somewhere around Sacramento the crew decided to turn back to SFO because the nosewheel wouldn't retract. The aircraft dumped fuel and landed safely at SFO. The flight was then delayed for 25 hours and on Monday, two KLM B744s will be taking off from SFO within an hour, yesterday's PH-BFG and Monday's KL606, likely to be operated by PH-BFB (subject to change).
golfyankeesierra is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2007, 04:19
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: OZ
Posts: 1,115
Received 10 Likes on 4 Posts
Errrr we ARE talking about the NOSE gear here, right?
mustafagander is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2007, 05:03
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re fuel dumping, seafood issues, etc: I was always under the impression that jet fuel evaporated fairly quickly when dumped to the point where it was unlikely to cause pollution on land or sea (not sure about the atmosphere). Any comments re this?
Cheers
dghob
dghob is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2007, 05:55
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: AEP
Age: 80
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seafood and mosquitoes...

dghob /
xxx
You are correct, that is what I heard too, or probably read somewhere...
However, if you dump at low level, in a holding pattern, I remember being recommended to do it with a slight climb (200 fpm?), if you do 1 minute legs, so as to not come back into your own "evaporated" fuel... Generally, ATC tells you where to go to do your dirty stuff... I cannot recall where it would be for SFO, probably overwater.
xxx

Happy contrails
BelArgUSA is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2007, 05:48
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: British Columbia
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps another thing they considered in the dump/no-dump decision was being unable to raise the entire landing gear in the event of the proverbial engine failure during an overweight overshoot.
Performance-wise, that might be untested and therefore undocumented, leaving them wondering if it could climb away with the extra drag.
So: heavy, engine-out go-around, unable to retract all the landing gear....
Except for simulating it at altitude to see if it could, that might weigh heavily( oops, a pun) on their decision to dump.
sidestick stirrer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.