Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Who's gonna fly your airlines' Bizjets?

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Who's gonna fly your airlines' Bizjets?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Jun 2001, 15:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Haulin' Trash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Red face Who's gonna fly your airlines' Bizjets?

2 major airlines have announced plans to buy corporate jets including Virgin (Virgin JetSet). Initial orders have been placed buy a US carrier. See Paris reports. Others including BA, Delta and American are looking hard.

Who's gonna fly them under what contract?

This is coming to an airline near you soon.
 
Old 28th Jun 2001, 16:13
  #2 (permalink)  
Buz Off
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

Haulin',

Can you explain "Paris Reports"?

Do you just mean news reports about this from the Paris Air Show?
 
Old 28th Jun 2001, 16:17
  #3 (permalink)  
Haulin' Trash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Buz - yes, orders placed, flying starts in the US next year. Europe - VS next?
 
Old 28th Jun 2001, 16:36
  #4 (permalink)  
E. MORSE
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

I think they will be flown by pilots.
 
Old 28th Jun 2001, 17:13
  #5 (permalink)  
Manflex55
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

E. Morse,

Not sure about that... where did you get that information ?
 
Old 28th Jun 2001, 17:40
  #6 (permalink)  
Shanwick Shanwick
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Lightbulb

The Virgin aircraft will be flown by Virgin Pilots on a Virgin contract. I'm led to believe they're to be based at either Luton or Northolt and operate to JFK, Seattle and Dubai initially. Due to commence autumn 2002.

------------------
hhhiiisssssccrrrraaaacckkkllesssshhhhhh
 
Old 28th Jun 2001, 19:08
  #7 (permalink)  
tilii
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up

Hmmm! Very interesting concept, presumably aimed at the elite corporate market who might otherwise fly mainline First Class but are becoming cheesed off with long check-in times and other frustrating delays caused by the lesser mortal majority in their midst.

Makes sense, and much cheaper than buying your own GV I suppose.

I think I like it. Hope my outfit follows suit in due course. Rather fancy the sharp end of a GV and the proposed routes.
 
Old 28th Jun 2001, 23:35
  #8 (permalink)  
Enter after the Virgin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

presumably the space on the GV would be sold
by individual seat, and not a sole use charter.

First class cabin's these days are very private with little cabins effectivley, where as a GV's would have an open cabin set-up (or be very be claustrophobic/confined)

I can't see someone paying top dollar to share a PRIVATE jet transatlantic, as it becomes a contradiction in terms ?

I reckon about £15-20k rtn per seat ? for a LON-SEA

not sure how this compares with main line though

 
Old 29th Jun 2001, 00:01
  #9 (permalink)  
OrsonCart
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Lightbulb

United Airlines = Fractional ownership.

Virgin /Jetset = Scheduled services from an airport close to London.

Qatar Airways start a schedule soon with an A319CJ.
 
Old 29th Jun 2001, 00:03
  #10 (permalink)  
LAVDUMPER
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Trash,

I just read that Virgin may acquire up to 5 Bombardier Global Express airplanes for premium service across the Pond. No idea about the routes or airports used on either end - although I heard that Luton - Newburgh, NY was a consideration - that would work pretty well...

Yeah, flying a Global Express wouldn't be so bad - nice flight deck... It could probably fit 20-30 first-class seats and fly 6000 miles or so.

Branson would set the bar AGAIN! Not surprising...
 
Old 29th Jun 2001, 04:48
  #11 (permalink)  
tilii
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

Enter after the Virgin

The GV does not have to be set up as 'open cabin'. Have you ever seen what can be done with the cabins of corporate jets these days? So far removed from "claustrophobic/confined" that the mind boggles.
 
Old 29th Jun 2001, 12:37
  #12 (permalink)  
Haulin' Trash
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Red face

Anyone worried about our employers taking on pilots to fly these bizjets on separate, low paid contacts. I'd be interested to hear how Virgin propose to do it.
 
Old 29th Jun 2001, 20:12
  #13 (permalink)  
Boss Raptor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

Virgin had grand plans for a similar 'complimentary' operation with Citation 2's back in early 90's - had an office in Radius Park LHR but not certain it ever happened!?
 
Old 29th Jun 2001, 22:28
  #14 (permalink)  
northern boy
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

If it does happen I hope it dosen't end up like the soon to disappear Virgin Sun.Three years down the road, everyone content then flogged off with attendant disruption to all involved.Otherwise, great idea, hope it comes off.Maybe it will forestall the whingeing about us horrid Sun drivers comming back with quote, "no loss of seniority.".Sorry guys, but we never went away.
 
Old 29th Jun 2001, 23:06
  #15 (permalink)  
JR/FO
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Cool

This is how UAL plans to structure their flight crews:

Got this from AirlineRumor.com

Who will Fly Them?

The issue of who will fly for the new fractional program was carefully considered, said Oran, who served as corporate counsel in the area of pilot negotiations for United from 1987 to 1994. A letter sent by the UAL master executive council (MEC) on May 8 to its 10,000 pilot union members described UAL’s plans in some detail. The fractional-ownership division would be the core component of the business jet enterprise. The division–separate from United Airlines–would provide total operational support, “including pilots and maintenance, as well as incidental requirements.”

In the early planning stages, UAL was careful to solicit the support of its pilot union MEC. The 29 voting members of the MEC were far from unanimous in their approval, some expressing the belief that UAL should concentrate on its core airline business. On the other hand, most felt it was “an opportunity to make a positive financial impact on the company without negatively affecting United’s pilots.”

Of further interest to pilots, part of the business plan includes provisions for a possible corporate shuttle division for “certain large corporate customers,” using Airbus Corporate Jetliners and/or Boeing Business Jets. The airplanes would be owned by the corporate customer but managed, maintained and operated by United Airlines. Most significant from the pilots’ perspective, Oran said they would be flown by mainline United pilots on the United pilot seniority list at mainline wages. Oran said, “United currently operates about 100 Airbus A319s,” indicating that the European airframer may have an edge, should the corporate shuttle program go forward.

Pilots for the smaller aircraft would come from outside the United ranks. In a policy that may have been included to tempt pilots from other fractional operators, Oran said the new division would “provide interviews with the mainline airline for fractional pilots.”

Sure sounds like some pretty interesting flying but at the same time is UAL venturing off the end of the plank with this one?



[This message has been edited by JR/FO (edited 29 June 2001).]
 
Old 30th Jun 2001, 07:24
  #16 (permalink)  
Oilhead
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs down

UAL-MEC was certainly far from unanimous - in fact it was passed by a single vote. Hardly a ringing endorsement.

Some UAL retirees will fly them if they can.
 
Old 30th Jun 2001, 09:28
  #17 (permalink)  
Ignition Override
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Lightbulb

Maybe it is not yet a reason for true paranoia at United etc , but for the most junior pilots and any future new-hires, watch the contract language very carefully.

Can't business jets often be stretched? The CRJ is, in general, a stretched Canadair corporate jet, is it not?

Warpspeed: hast Du schon eine *-**** von "Starbase-E" bekommen?
 
Old 30th Jun 2001, 10:54
  #18 (permalink)  
Max Sectors
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

Who cares who flies them and on what contract? as long as its not foreign labour.

Would you rather build your union empire and stop this happenning altogether?
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.