Loss of seperation????
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: York
Age: 42
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Loss of seperation????
Hi,
My first post after a long time reading (and hopefully learning)
I work for a tour operator as a hotel contractor and fly regularly.
I am curious, flying back CGN-MAN this afternoon with HLX and something really unnerved me - flying in proximity to London (according to broadcast map), looking out of the window and enjoying a beer I saw another aircraft what looked like coming straight for us at same FL.
It kept coming to the point I seriously thought we were going to colide - I swear I could see the crew in the flight deck at the last moment.At what seemed like the last secoond we desended very, very quickly and went into a very steep left turn (much steeper than I have ever experienced after well over 3-400 flights) There was a noticeable increase in engine noise.
As we came out of the bank I could see the other aircraft above us at what must have been very close (was not a livery I recognised).
Purser was called to the cockpit afterwards but no announcement was made. However it seemed to me like a very near miss in UK airspace.
I could (and hope I am) wrong - please do not blast me for this, it really shook me and some of my fellow passengers up. Lets just say the crew made a few extra pounds of comission from whisky sales.
If anyone could shed any light I would be very happy,
Thanks guys - most of you do a pretty remarkable job keeping us SLF (and yourselves) safe.
Chris
My first post after a long time reading (and hopefully learning)
I work for a tour operator as a hotel contractor and fly regularly.
I am curious, flying back CGN-MAN this afternoon with HLX and something really unnerved me - flying in proximity to London (according to broadcast map), looking out of the window and enjoying a beer I saw another aircraft what looked like coming straight for us at same FL.
It kept coming to the point I seriously thought we were going to colide - I swear I could see the crew in the flight deck at the last moment.At what seemed like the last secoond we desended very, very quickly and went into a very steep left turn (much steeper than I have ever experienced after well over 3-400 flights) There was a noticeable increase in engine noise.
As we came out of the bank I could see the other aircraft above us at what must have been very close (was not a livery I recognised).
Purser was called to the cockpit afterwards but no announcement was made. However it seemed to me like a very near miss in UK airspace.
I could (and hope I am) wrong - please do not blast me for this, it really shook me and some of my fellow passengers up. Lets just say the crew made a few extra pounds of comission from whisky sales.
If anyone could shed any light I would be very happy,
Thanks guys - most of you do a pretty remarkable job keeping us SLF (and yourselves) safe.
Chris
Sounds like the crew may have responded to a TCAS RA.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: You Name It.
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Definitely not, TCAS only directs you to climb or desend. Turning can only compound your problem. While you are climbing the other aircraft is directed to do the opposite. This assumes both aircraft are fitted with TCAS. Very clever system!
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: You Name It.
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry Nigel but the first rule of TCAS procedure is NOT to maneuver based on TA alone. You must wait for the RA to trigger before you do anything. Relying on visual contact to avoid is not recommended as you can easily find yourself in a secondary RA and deep doo doo! It's getting to a point where we only need the windows for the last 50 feet of the approach, and even that's optional.
Ohcirrej
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IF (big IF) it was a nasty, perhaps the turn was avoiding action issued by ATC?
Question from me - I'm led to believe that it's SOP for some operators out there if a an RA is received whilst in a turn some will stop the turn/adopt a more wings level attitude.
Question from me - I'm led to believe that it's SOP for some operators out there if a an RA is received whilst in a turn some will stop the turn/adopt a more wings level attitude.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: You Name It.
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You NEVER EVER give priority to ATC over a TCAS RA!! Do I have to tell you about the Ueberlingen incident? You follow TCAS with wings level. This is a memory item guys, why are so many people asking if it's OK to do anything else? If you are flying in busy airspace with the idea you can do your own thing, it is very worrying.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: washington,dc
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
citation 500 is quite right. as to engine noise increasing, the passenger reported that the bank was very steep...perhaps the pilots were making darn sure they kept a safe speed .
I do think the passenger should take some solice in knowing that everything did work out. a miss is as good as a mile or should I say three miles.
I do think the passenger should take some solice in knowing that everything did work out. a miss is as good as a mile or should I say three miles.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: S51 30 W060 10.
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the turn could have been initiated after someone in the cockpit saw the intruder a/c, basically the PF follows the RA commands while the PM tries to spot the traffic and calls out any ommitted actions, then inform ATC.
The "engine noise" could have been the sound of the airflow increasing, and not the engines themselves. If description is right chances are it was an RA.
Regards,
SW.
The "engine noise" could have been the sound of the airflow increasing, and not the engines themselves. If description is right chances are it was an RA.
Regards,
SW.
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Maastricht, NL
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The turn could have been given by ATC when they realised you're gonna get too close to the other a/c. Since we're also taught not to give vertical clearances if TCAS is involved, and we all know that vectoring is a much better idea than trying to push a climb/descent, the controller could have given an avoiding turn, to increase separation if this was the case.
Anyway, not that much, but still better to end up with 3 nm and a TCAS RA than with 0 nm and a TCAS RA...
Anyway, not that much, but still better to end up with 3 nm and a TCAS RA than with 0 nm and a TCAS RA...
<<the first rule of TCAS procedure is NOT to maneuver based on TA alone>>
Must say that I HAVE done so.
Level 330 in heavy classic.
Crossing traffic cleared climb 320 continues climb past 320.
I guessed they'd mistaken 320 for 330 and started climb.
ATC then told us to climb.
My reasoning was that, if his performance was greater than ours we were better to start climb sooner rather than later.
Command decision on the day
Must say that I HAVE done so.
Level 330 in heavy classic.
Crossing traffic cleared climb 320 continues climb past 320.
I guessed they'd mistaken 320 for 330 and started climb.
ATC then told us to climb.
My reasoning was that, if his performance was greater than ours we were better to start climb sooner rather than later.
Command decision on the day
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: York
Age: 42
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for info
Thanks for the info guys - appreciate it.
As for the engine noise - I have to admit that I think 'and overall increase of noise' would have been more appopriate to say - I have to say that I assumed rather than was sure.
And bomarc, believe me I was full of solice
Can anyone tell me how regular these type of instances are??
Safe flying
Chris
As for the engine noise - I have to admit that I think 'and overall increase of noise' would have been more appopriate to say - I have to say that I assumed rather than was sure.
And bomarc, believe me I was full of solice
Can anyone tell me how regular these type of instances are??
Safe flying
Chris
Ohcirrej
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thank you Citation500 , that's exactly what I meant. Avoiding action given by ATC then RA. Seen it happen.
As to regularity, in high density airspace RA can be triggered by high rates of climb/descent of closing traffic before they level off. As TCAS is timed based, the system ascertains a "closest point of approach" of the traffic and provides a resolution if required.........not knowing the other aircraft will be levelling off.
As to regularity, in high density airspace RA can be triggered by high rates of climb/descent of closing traffic before they level off. As TCAS is timed based, the system ascertains a "closest point of approach" of the traffic and provides a resolution if required.........not knowing the other aircraft will be levelling off.
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
Disgusted of Tunbridge
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Before we get this done and dusted as a TCAS Loss of Separation incident and it goes down in the PPrune record as that, perhaps someone could confirm whether there has actually been an airprox incident in the London area on 1 June, or is this an overactive passenger impression?