I NEED YOUR HELP, STUARDES ARE IN STRIKE!!!
Guest
Posts: n/a
I NEED YOUR HELP, STUARDES ARE IN STRIKE!!!
HI,guys!!
I need your help. Stuardes of AEROFLOT(Russian Airlines) are in strike(they have no salary at all).And our bosses forced us to
fly without stuardes.For example, 6 stuardes for B-777.I can't find right site to complain to Flight Safety. I want Flight Safety to check all flights of AEROFLOT in NEW YORK, SEATTLE, LOS-ANGELLES & SAN-FRANCISCO. Because I can't resist of force of our bosses, but tomorrow I will inform my bosses, that they will have a PROBLEM to brake all rules. Please send this message to right adress and give me answer. Thanks to everyboby.
I need your help. Stuardes of AEROFLOT(Russian Airlines) are in strike(they have no salary at all).And our bosses forced us to
fly without stuardes.For example, 6 stuardes for B-777.I can't find right site to complain to Flight Safety. I want Flight Safety to check all flights of AEROFLOT in NEW YORK, SEATTLE, LOS-ANGELLES & SAN-FRANCISCO. Because I can't resist of force of our bosses, but tomorrow I will inform my bosses, that they will have a PROBLEM to brake all rules. Please send this message to right adress and give me answer. Thanks to everyboby.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Sounds to me like you violated the FARs by flying without a full crew. YOu are the Captain or Co-pilot have the last call as to a flight occuring. If you tookoff with no crew than you are to blame.
[This message has been edited by 747FOCAL (edited 09 May 2001).]
[This message has been edited by 747FOCAL (edited 09 May 2001).]
Guest
Posts: n/a
Guest
Posts: n/a
Teodora
if you are not full load (depending on your AC version) 6 FA might be ok. The rules say ther must be at least 1 certified FA per pair of doors + 1 every 50 pax or portion of 50. I would like to point out that if the flight crew decides to take off in this situation, then it is your business. The Capt is ultimately responsible for the decision of departing in unsafe conditions and the FO can't pretend not being aware.
If something turns out you can be held responsible of all the times you were flying "outlaw"
if you are not full load (depending on your AC version) 6 FA might be ok. The rules say ther must be at least 1 certified FA per pair of doors + 1 every 50 pax or portion of 50. I would like to point out that if the flight crew decides to take off in this situation, then it is your business. The Capt is ultimately responsible for the decision of departing in unsafe conditions and the FO can't pretend not being aware.
If something turns out you can be held responsible of all the times you were flying "outlaw"
Guest
Posts: n/a
Flyblue it is like this on this side on the pond. Even if A/C goes with 1 pax you should have the minimun crew required for that type. Altough, in my particular case (book on hands) it says, for example: Minimum crew required for BAe146-300(110 pax full load) is 3 CA (regardless of number of pax on board) ... but yes, it could go with only 2 depending on number of pax, under special cases, with a special permission, and if both CA are N.1 .... Never seen a case anyway.
On the other hand, our 50 pax A/C are generally operated by 2 CA, but they can fly, legally, just with one (N.1) and they have 1 pair or doors at the front plus over/under wings exits....
I wonder what regulations are in that other side Teodora mentioned....But I think, for personal experience, you have to be carefull when landing on FAA territory.....
------------------
*************************Happy Landings!
*************************
[This message has been edited by Xenia (edited 10 May 2001).]
On the other hand, our 50 pax A/C are generally operated by 2 CA, but they can fly, legally, just with one (N.1) and they have 1 pair or doors at the front plus over/under wings exits....
I wonder what regulations are in that other side Teodora mentioned....But I think, for personal experience, you have to be carefull when landing on FAA territory.....
------------------
*************************Happy Landings!
*************************
[This message has been edited by Xenia (edited 10 May 2001).]
Guest
Posts: n/a
Blue,
It is number of installed seats, not pax as the dictating factor regarding flt attendants.
You answered your own question about wondering "why the difference?" when you mentioned you were from France.
Surely you donīt find France being out of step with the rest of the aviation world "odd" do you?
[This message has been edited by DownIn3Green (edited 10 May 2001).]
It is number of installed seats, not pax as the dictating factor regarding flt attendants.
You answered your own question about wondering "why the difference?" when you mentioned you were from France.
Surely you donīt find France being out of step with the rest of the aviation world "odd" do you?
[This message has been edited by DownIn3Green (edited 10 May 2001).]