Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Olympic Pax Lives Up to His Name in Security Breach

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Olympic Pax Lives Up to His Name in Security Breach

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Feb 2002, 18:14
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Downunder
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

I thought that prolonged periods of keeping your arms above your shoulder was considered a form of torture. Thirty minuutes is a prolonged period of time.

If that is so, then, these air marshalls or the US government is prepared to torture innocent passengers; foreign and domestic without just cause.

All because the airlines/government cannot properly screen PAX, onboard luggage and aircraft to ensure that the flight is not compromised.

What happens if one of the PAX has a medical problem which is complicated by these actions?. .Who will accept responsibility for these actions?

There should be some latitude given before such actions are taken. The process needs 'humanising'; when you gotta go, you gotta go!

<img src="eek.gif" border="0"> <img src="confused.gif" border="0"> <img src="frown.gif" border="0">
TheGreatLeslie is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2002, 18:34
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: where I shouldn’t be
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

So where is the pragmatic solution? Quite frankly I have to agree with Avman, and it isn’t even the possible bathroom dilemma I might find myself in. -- I can see the immigration officer asking what I want here, answering that I’m flight crew or that I’ll be of to Florida for some leisure flying, winding up in a maximum security prison being some big guy sweetie just because I’m a pilot?. .As of recently I’ll be exploring other parts of the world until the US get a grip on the situation.
N380UA is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2002, 18:44
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: west coast of Florida
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

...."Mr.Bizzaro you have been found guilty of air hi-botrey,Baliff whack his peepee..." <img src="tongue.gif" border="0">
spinproof is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2002, 18:49
  #24 (permalink)  

Plaything of fine moderators everywhere
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: On the beach
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

First point. Men who have had prostrate treatment (for example) often can't control their bladder. What gets you into more trouble - going to the toilet or soaking your seat for the next occupant?

Second point. Hands over head is not good for the circulation. Add to that the DVT problem on long flights. If someone pops their clogs from a combination of the two, who picks up the (very expensive) tab - the airline or whoever controls the actions of the Sky Marshals?

Probably both if this is modern America.
Biggles Flies Undone is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2002, 19:16
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: TMI
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I wonder what would have happened if Mr. Bizzaro had been an Arab, Indian, Pakistani or of any dark skin race.
LevelFive is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2002, 19:32
  #26 (permalink)  

Plaything of fine moderators everywhere
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: On the beach
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The more I think about this, the more cross I become.

Exclude scenarios where it is self-inflicted (i.e. drinking too much liquid). Take the prostate example I suggested above. If you can demonstrate that you are not a threat and really need a pee, why should they stop you?

If I was in that situation and was forced to wet my seat (and thereby be hugely embarrassed) I would sue them. In America the definition of 'Personal Injury' covers many things, including humiliation. The implications for carriers could be huge.
Biggles Flies Undone is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2002, 20:03
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London
Posts: 229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

How do you demonstrate that you REALLY need to pee?! <img src="confused.gif" border="0">
Grim Reaper 14 is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2002, 20:08
  #28 (permalink)  

Plaything of fine moderators everywhere
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: On the beach
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

GR14 - are you taking the pee? <img src="wink.gif" border="0">
Biggles Flies Undone is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2002, 21:01
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: south of Cirencester, north of Lyneham
Age: 77
Posts: 1,267
Received 20 Likes on 9 Posts
Post

Fortunately, I'm not flying to Salt Lake tomorrow. I am going via Chicago to San Diego, though. One of the unfortunate things about diabetes is that you do pee a lot, even when the disease is well controlled. And guess what - I'm diabetic.

And I guess if we had trouble, the work would end up being done outside the US, so reducing a need for employees there....
radeng is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2002, 21:35
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Earth
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Oh please, this rule is not that absurd.

If you're diabetic, just make an effort to use the lav say, 35 minutes before landing. Are you telling me that you have a critical need to pee every 45 minutes? I find that hard to believe. If someone has a medical condition that gives them an urgent need to urinate every 45 minutes, they should be accomodated, but they should make prior arrangements with the authorities beforehand. Even my cancerous granny can hold it that long......

Just a shred of planning is all it takes to stay within the law. It's not hard. This rule makes good sense, and I'd be more than willing to waive my right to pee for an hour or so in the name of national security. I would think most people might feel the same? Maybe I just don't consider urinating as sacred a ritual as some....
Alchemy is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2002, 22:06
  #31 (permalink)  
Tan
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: The World
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Alchemy

I see by your profile that you list yourself as a student. That possibility explains your naivety in regards to security matters. Might I suggest that you reread your history books for a finer insight into what's really going on...
Tan is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2002, 22:20
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: New Jersey Shore
Age: 92
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

This is NOT security, it is STUPIDITY!

Our government has gotten completely out of hand. Every time something like this gets reported, more people refuse to fly.
I. M. Esperto is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2002, 22:43
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Earth
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Read my history books.....hmmm yes, I feel so sooo opressed by not taking a **** for 30 min prior to landing. It just isn't that big a deal for the average person, and it's a right I'm willing to waive in order to prevent some saudi with a death wish from plowing the a/c into a stadium full of 25,000 people.
Alchemy is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2002, 23:01
  #34 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: 75N 16E
Age: 54
Posts: 4,729
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Paranoia or what!
englishal is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2002, 23:08
  #35 (permalink)  
Tan
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: The World
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I. M. Esperto

I'm afraid your right, it is stupidity...The government, in the name of security, is going to continue on this disastrous course until they kill the lifeblood of the global economy, aviation.
Tan is offline  
Old 12th Feb 2002, 23:21
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Which models have a set of flight controls in the head ? And why 30 minutes anyway ?. .Normally the seat belt sign will be called for at least 20 minutes before arrival, earlier if a turbulent descent is anticipated. For sure nobody should be up and about below 10000'. I don't see how this extra inhibition enhances security in any way. Why not get the CC to lock the toilets after the seat belt bell ?
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2002, 05:14
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: France
Age: 57
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Solution to the problem!!!!!!!!!

1/ Bring a small coke or water bottle with you on flight.. .2/ If you find you really need to go on the final 30 min pee into bottle(under blanket).. .3/ As you leave the plane hand the bottle to ground staff for disposal!!!

This will soon bring the problem home to the management who will probably have a few of the bottles delivered to their desks first class!!!!!

Won't last long

. . <img src="mad.gif" border="0">
Peter L is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2002, 06:37
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: TMI
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

<a href="http://www.briefrelief.com/" target="_blank">http://www.briefrelief.com/</A>
LevelFive is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2002, 07:02
  #39 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

An update on Mr. Bizzaro's predicament:

Suspect Says He Doubted Marshals . . . .BY MICHAEL VIGH. .THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE

Richard Bizzaro claims that when three young men in street clothes took control of a commercial airliner bound for Salt Lake City, he believed they were hijackers posing as sky marshals. And he wasn't going to let them get away with it. . . "I believed I was witnessing a hijacking of our airplane," Bizzaro said Monday in his first public statement since he was charged two days earlier with felony interference with a flight crew. . . But when the Park City man's Delta Air Lines flight from Los Angeles touched down Saturday night, he was the one arrested by the same trio of federal agents, who had taken over the flight after Bizzaro improperly left his seat. . . "I believe the situation was aggravated by my and other people's attitudes prompted by the Sept. 11 attacks where we are all fearful of one another," Bizzaro said in a written statement in which he apologized for his actions. . . About 30 minutes before landing, Bizzaro, who happened to have appeared on an in-flight video feature about his business, left his first-class seat and went to the restroom. Under Olympic security rules, passengers on commercial flights into Salt Lake City may not leave their seats during the final half-hour in the air. . . Bizzaro, a frequent traveler, said he had never heard the restriction announced before, and no one stopped him when he stood up. When he exited the restroom, Bizzaro said he was confronted by a flight attendant, whose comments he interpreted as rudeness. . . "I now know she was just doing her job," Bizzaro said. . . Federal prosecutors say he intimidated the attendant with his stares and his size -- 6 feet, 2 inches and 235 pounds. . . After he finally sat down, Bizzaro was seen giving a "thumbs up" to a pair of passengers, an FBI agent alleges. Bizzaro, 59, vehemently denies that allegation and says the three air marshals looked young enough to be his grandchildren and may have had fake badges. One marshal was wearing a baseball cap backward, he added. . . "They did not give the appearance they were law enforcement officers and I did not pay them the proper respect," Bizzaro said. "I overheard conversations between the young men that they were observing something going on at the back of the plane. It did not occur to me that I was seen as the problem until I was informed afterwards." . . The agents said Bizzaro continually looked at the coach cabin, making his behavior appear suspicious. Bizzaro's attorney, Max Wheeler, said his client looked back because "he thought a hijacking was going on in the back of the plane." . . After he demanded a closer look at the badges, he realized they were real and began to comply, Wheeler said. . . Until that time, he said, Bizzaro was thinking he may have to take action against the trio as the passengers appear to have done on the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania on Sept. 11. . . U.S. Attorney Paul Warner wasn't sounding mollified on Monday, two days after he charged Bizzaro with a federal crime that could net him up to 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine. . . "This is an important point: We're taking a heightened look at anything that appears to have an impact on the safety and security of the Games," Warner said. . . Bizzaro is CEO of Unicity Network of Orem, a multilevel marketing company with $100 million in annual sales of herbal supplements. The company was featured in an in-flight CNN news segment. . . Bizzaro found it "kind of surreal," Wheeler said. "He was arrested just after seeing his business featured on the flight."
Airbubba is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2002, 09:31
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chicago
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The rule is idiotic, as is much of the heralded new security measures. 20 years in jail for taking a leak? You got to be kidding! Of course the pax should have heard and listened to the announcement but that doesn't make the rule any more stupid! He was acting suspiciously by looking back into the coach cabin - if thats suspicious arrest half of the pax on any given flight. I am afraid not of breaking some insipid airsecurity law but of being confronted for "suspicious" behavior and busting out laughing casuing security to take some "face saving" action
GeofJ is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.