Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

The Heathrow Shimmy

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

The Heathrow Shimmy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Mar 2007, 20:36
  #1 (permalink)  
ImageGear
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The Heathrow Shimmy

Friday night SLF inbound for 09L from a little Isle to the west, and vectors from the Bovingdon hold, appeared to overstep the 09L localiser abeam Woodley, got it back together, then invited to shimmy onto 09R quite late over Queen Mary's.

Did'nt worry me since I knew what was happening, however a few souls gasped when the starboard wing dropped quickly towards the pond.

Question: How late would you attempt the shimmy, before you go TOGA

Imagegear
 
Old 24th Mar 2007, 20:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: LHR/EGLL
Age: 45
Posts: 4,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From our point of view, if it was a heavy, we'd generally not bother asking if the a/c was inside four miles from touchdown. For A320s, 737s etc maybe 3 miles.
Gonzo is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2007, 21:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: oxfordshire
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think I would switch runways below 1500' on an A320 but there is no rule about it in my company.
hotmetal is offline  
Old 25th Mar 2007, 23:36
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,659
Likes: 0
Received 19 Likes on 16 Posts
It's always a notable thing to see from the ground as well, saw a 27R to 27L sideslip a week or two ago. Presumably caused by the spacing getting too tight. Wonder how many departure slots get suddenly lost by such action, two or three ?

And it's something that maybe will not be possible with mixed mode. Will a go-around will be the only option then.
WHBM is online now  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 08:12
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It is not called a sideslip but a sidestep! A sideslip would be very dramatic indeed on that size of aircraft.
JW411 is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 08:21
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The Heart
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As long as one can be stablized at 1000' or 500' according to the company's SOP.
Easier if the other runway is staggered.
Miserlou is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 08:33
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The Trident was great at this manoeuvre. I once watched a Trident 3 hack across the maintenance area at an angle of about 45 degrees.

TOO
TheOddOne is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 08:54
  #8 (permalink)  

ex-Tanker
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Luton Beds UK
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Used to be a standard thing at ZRH, with the added complication(s) that:
The RWs did not have thresholds at the same distance and
They were not parallel.

The main reason to sidestep (they called it swingover) was to get a clear run to the parking area and save about 5min taxy time.

Whether you did it or not (provided it was offered) depended to a large extent on not only the vis. but the direction of the sun. There was quite often haze out to the north too, which the tower couldn´t see.

Anyway all those fun and games stopped when someone got a bit too cavalier and pranged a wing on touch down. Shame really.

How to do it:
Be established on speed and config. early
Have it well briefed beforehand (GA might be different etc.)
Be ready for a last minute change (ATC has a few other things going on)
Do it Visually, and be ready visually before the sidestep is made! Don't try to follow at the last minute GP and Loc on some instrument.
Get on the Centreline first and assess Glide after that.

Enjoy!

FC.
Few Cloudy is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 09:06
  #9 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Life's too short to brief for a runway swap on every approach into LHR! It's essentially a visual manoeuvre only which I've done several times. So:
Autopilot/Flight Directors off
turn straight away, don't overshoot centreline
get on VASIs as soon as possible- forget retuning ILS
get new go-around read to you- if time get new runway in FMS, but not essential
it will be a manual go-around, just like the old days!
Rainboe is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 10:14
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: ireland
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite right FW, just for info, was in ZRH other day and was offered and took the 14-16 swing-over, still fun.
curser is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 10:38
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: England
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The mandatory go-around at 500RA if not stablised is not just a company SOP requirement, it's a JAR-OPS requirement and probably an FAA requirement too.
Cold Soak is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 10:38
  #12 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like several here I have had it 'offered' several times in my life and I agree it is worth including in the brief for those places where it is 'likely'. I fear that bringing a new F/O 'with me' on a late unbriefed runway swap is just asking too much of a one-man-band-show! As for 'getting it into the FMS....................'
BOAC is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 10:57
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You do not actually have to be aligned with the runway centre line at 500ft in order to be in compliance with the stability criteria though.
GS-Alpha is online now  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 14:54
  #14 (permalink)  
Warning Toxic!
Disgusted of Tunbridge
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hampshire, UK
Posts: 4,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like several here I have had it 'offered' several times in my life and I agree it is worth including in the brief for those places where it is 'likely'. I fear that bringing a new F/O 'with me' on a late unbriefed runway swap is just asking too much of a one-man-band-show! As for 'getting it into the FMS....................'
Well at airports like LHR, BOS, LAX, SFO, SIN, BKK and JFK where it can occasionally happen, operating regularly to those places, I assure you nobody briefs every time 'just on the off-chance'! You either can handle it or you can't. A good crew can get the new runway into the FMS- I did most times, but it doesn't matter. As for a new F/O, it's a case of 'watch this!'. It's down to your experience- don't worry if you can't hack it- just don't take the offer! Go around instead.
Rainboe is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 16:43
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Member of the 32% club.
Posts: 2,423
Received 40 Likes on 16 Posts
Hi Rainboe.
Thanks for your top tips on side stepping late in the approach. Next time things get a bit tight I will shout "watch this" and time permitting put my boots and spurs on!
Airbrake is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 17:43
  #16 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
It seems to be a regular occurence at KMCO, where the difference between 17R and 17L is a significant taxi distance. All triggered by how fast the other guy vacates, so definitely an opportunity basis rather than a plan. Mind you, predominately blue sky helps a lot I suppose.
Two's in is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 17:53
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On a lighter note. The first time I ever came across this was late on in approach somewhere in Germany. To get the full effect you must say this in a very strong German accent.

"Ah British do you swing ?"

Caused amusement at the time.
CheekyVisual is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2007, 19:54
  #18 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
Most impressive one I saw was a US Airways 737 coming into Washington National a few years ago, finals to a late vacating aicraft on Rwy 1, switched at about 500' to Rwy 33, all done over the river so no encroachment over DC (this was pre-9/11), but was still getting the bank off over the keys. Must have been ex-Navy driver.
Two's in is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 08:58
  #19 (permalink)  

ex-Tanker
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Luton Beds UK
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile Do you Swing?

Cheeky Visual - the right name for the post!
The best exponent of this manoever was a lady pilot called Katherin Fisch, which was probably the origin - not of the swing - but the song: "I wish I could shimmy like my sister Kate".
FC.
Few Cloudy is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2007, 10:23
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Long ago and far away ......
Posts: 1,399
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
BOAC,

"As for 'getting it into the FMS....................'"

I assume you meant that tongue in cheek- ish?

Having come from a world of large multi-engine jets, but little of the fancy gadgetry of a modern airliner, I now tend to find there is an infernal preoccupation with that blasted FMS, at what I consider the most inoppurtune moments. In a sidestep manouevre of the nature discussed here you should be visual with both runways - sod the FMS ( ), look out the window and land the bloody thing visually! Thats what the windows are for. Just because the runway doesn't appear on the ND or the magenta string doesn't go to my landing concrete does not mean we will disappear in to the Bermuda Triangle!
MrBernoulli is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.