Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Even bigger fines for SAS?

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Even bigger fines for SAS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Aug 2001, 03:37
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Sweden
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool Even bigger fines for SAS?

The fines given to SAS for the recently discovered illegal cartel between Maersk and SAS are going to be dwarfed by the new fines expected for the similarly illegal SAS and Skyways "cooperation" rumours say. The next illegal competition actions that would have been examined by kkv was the methods used by SAS to get rid of competitor Transwede/Braathens from the swedish market. It seems however that SAS is getting away from the probable claims from Braathens by buying the whole company.
Laminar is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2001, 15:08
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Gulf playing Golf
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

What the big deal. Cartels are common in all trades of life. Looks like the EEC are working out from some pinkish ideal of how the world should be....so the break SAS' neck. So what! Next day another company will fill the void, and they in turn will be charged for something else....crazy world.

I't like Tour de France...may the best doctor win..
Payscale is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2001, 22:30
  #3 (permalink)  
Hung start
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

The fines given to SAS for the recently discovered illegal cartel between Maersk and SAS are going to be dwarfed by the new fines expected for the similarly illegal SAS and Skyways "cooperation" rumours say
Have they already decided that the SAS/Skyways deal is illegal, or is that just wishful thinking on your part Laminar? To my knowledge, the "konkurrence tilsyn" in Sweden has recently said that it´ll be a while before they finish investigating that deal.

Another thing....why would those fines "dwarf" the fines handed out in the Maersk/SAS case?? Is the Skyways case that much bigger?? In dwarfing a 300 mill. kr. fine, then I expect that we are talking BILlions?????

And who is behind that rumour. Someone credible? Or a small competitor that smells blood?
 
Old 20th Aug 2001, 12:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 361
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

And just for info, Laminar: SAS is not buying Transwede/Braathens or Braathens/Malmø Aviation. (I believe there have been a fusion, and the two are now Braathens/Malmø Aviation)

SAS will buy Braathens under the condition that Braathens sell their stocks in the Swedish company. -Which may be hard to get rid of. Braathens have tried to sell Malmø Aviation before, and haven't succeded. If Braathens do not get rid of M.A., the Braathen family's holding companies have agreed to buy M.A. from SAS for NOK 1,-

Thus, If they don't get rid of M.A. to a reasonable price, the Braathen family might not have a single penny left from their share (430 million NOK) of the 1,1 billion NOK that SAS has offered, when the deal is closed.

See: Braathenbrødre kan miste hele salgsgevinsten from Aftenposten, May 24. 2001. Lots of other info there, too.

Nick.
Nick Figaretto is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2001, 15:08
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: head in the clouds
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The Braathens deal just got nixed. SAS say they´ll appeal.

Seems to me that Skyways has taken a lot more SAS jobs, excuse me, business from mainline than Maersk. A deal which appears to have been blown way out of proportion, me thinks. All this should be good news for SAS jocks, maybe they´ll get to keep flying their own routes again in the future.
Flathatter is offline  
Old 20th Aug 2001, 16:16
  #6 (permalink)  
Hung start
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

1) GREAT news!!!!!!!!!

2) Agree with it all!
 
Old 21st Aug 2001, 13:57
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Norway
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I have a hard time believing SAS will be fined for the Skyways connection as this is just another "big company/small company" deal that we see all over the place.
Skyways operate SAS flights on routes where SAS/SAS Commuter doesn't have small enough planes to operate economically.The STO-DUB route would not exist,for instance,if it hadn't been flown by Skyways "jungle jet" on SAS behalf.The SAS/Skyways link is completely different from the SAS/Maersk arrangement.It is legal and not counter-competitive.
Stein Meum is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2001, 10:54
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: head in the clouds
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

SAS/SAS Commuter doesn't have small enough planes to operate economically
And with Skyways, Air Botnia, etc. around they won´t get them, either.
Flathatter is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.