BAs Engineering Director Retires.
Thread Starter
BAs Engineering Director Retires.
Did he jump or was he pushed?
Alan (Big Mac) MacDonald handed in his notice today.
Considering the recent engineering issues and bad press, was it by mutual consent?
Alan (Big Mac) MacDonald handed in his notice today.
Considering the recent engineering issues and bad press, was it by mutual consent?
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: U.K
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's been rumoured he would go sometime around September for several months now. Can't say I'll be shedding any tears on the day he departs.
Still at least we'll be safe in the knowledge that perhaps one of his Scottish mafia or Welsh Tafia mates will take the hot seat.
Still at least we'll be safe in the knowledge that perhaps one of his Scottish mafia or Welsh Tafia mates will take the hot seat.
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Brighton
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Good Riddance!
Engineering has become a byword for expense and poor performance since he became Director. Too much control has been given to the accountants that have cut the wrong costs, management whose sole intention is to bully and intimidate the workforce and a total disregard for the professional recognition of Licensed Engineers within the organisation.
The recent proposal for the "Aircraft Maintenance Supervisor" is a prime example of management who either do not care and think they are beyond the realms of the usual processes of negotiating - probably both.
As many people here will probably be familiar with the AAIB reports regarding missing bits of airplanes and the recommendations there in, one of the main shortfalls highlighted was the lack of supervision about the aircraft under maintenance. Combined with the recent events at Glasgow, where a manager "lent" his approval stamp to an unqualified Technician, there is now a sudden urgency to introduce this supervisory grade, especially since BA had told the AAIB last autumn that it had acted on these recommendations.
Firstly, BA just tells its existing LAEs (Licensed Aircraft Engineers) of which there is around 500, "we want you to all be Supervisors, and here is your new powers". Rightly so, the question was asked "where's the money?" for the new responsibilities. There is none - so the proposal stalls in a tirade of negative feedback.
It goes quiet for a few weeks when management comes up with the next proposal. This time the Supervisor grade is now deemed to be management itself. All LAEs can apply for it and anyone else who meets the criteria. Very good, BUT there is a huge sting in the tail and issues which compromise the integrity and independence of the Certifying Engineer.
The LAEs which neither wish to become management or fail in their application will have an immediate pay cut of £3000. That’s going to do wonders for morale and productivity then - especially over the summer schedule.
Most worrying of all however is the conditions of TMG (Management Grade) in relation to Certifying Engineers and the pressures which surely will be put upon them, since a proportion of their salary(bonuses and pay rises) will be performance related. Forgive me, BUT can you see a conflict of interests here? I’m sure the AAIB will be impressed by this after the next incident report.
I've seen many young, good licensed engineers, leave BA as a direct result of the companies disdain for this group of individuals. These are exactly the people BA should be retaining for the future. I fear however it isn't going to get much better, but Big Mac leaving can only be good news.
Engineering has become a byword for expense and poor performance since he became Director. Too much control has been given to the accountants that have cut the wrong costs, management whose sole intention is to bully and intimidate the workforce and a total disregard for the professional recognition of Licensed Engineers within the organisation.
The recent proposal for the "Aircraft Maintenance Supervisor" is a prime example of management who either do not care and think they are beyond the realms of the usual processes of negotiating - probably both.
As many people here will probably be familiar with the AAIB reports regarding missing bits of airplanes and the recommendations there in, one of the main shortfalls highlighted was the lack of supervision about the aircraft under maintenance. Combined with the recent events at Glasgow, where a manager "lent" his approval stamp to an unqualified Technician, there is now a sudden urgency to introduce this supervisory grade, especially since BA had told the AAIB last autumn that it had acted on these recommendations.
Firstly, BA just tells its existing LAEs (Licensed Aircraft Engineers) of which there is around 500, "we want you to all be Supervisors, and here is your new powers". Rightly so, the question was asked "where's the money?" for the new responsibilities. There is none - so the proposal stalls in a tirade of negative feedback.
It goes quiet for a few weeks when management comes up with the next proposal. This time the Supervisor grade is now deemed to be management itself. All LAEs can apply for it and anyone else who meets the criteria. Very good, BUT there is a huge sting in the tail and issues which compromise the integrity and independence of the Certifying Engineer.
The LAEs which neither wish to become management or fail in their application will have an immediate pay cut of £3000. That’s going to do wonders for morale and productivity then - especially over the summer schedule.
Most worrying of all however is the conditions of TMG (Management Grade) in relation to Certifying Engineers and the pressures which surely will be put upon them, since a proportion of their salary(bonuses and pay rises) will be performance related. Forgive me, BUT can you see a conflict of interests here? I’m sure the AAIB will be impressed by this after the next incident report.
I've seen many young, good licensed engineers, leave BA as a direct result of the companies disdain for this group of individuals. These are exactly the people BA should be retaining for the future. I fear however it isn't going to get much better, but Big Mac leaving can only be good news.
A fantastic post Filler Dent, extremely well written !
"I've seen many young, good licensed engineers, leave BA as a direct result of the companies disdain for this group of individuals. These are exactly the people BA should be retaining for the future. I fear however it isn't going to get much better, but Big Mac leaving can only be good news.[/quote]"
I hung up my overalls last year and went to sit in the right hand seat for an airline that treats its staff with more respect than I ever recieved as a Licenced tech at BA. Been at Ryanair 13 months in Aug! Good luck to you all, especially the Gatwick lads...The Big Mac has destroyed Engineering and I hope he gets offered a directorship with SAP.
"I've seen many young, good licensed engineers, leave BA as a direct result of the companies disdain for this group of individuals. These are exactly the people BA should be retaining for the future. I fear however it isn't going to get much better, but Big Mac leaving can only be good news.[/quote]"
I hung up my overalls last year and went to sit in the right hand seat for an airline that treats its staff with more respect than I ever recieved as a Licenced tech at BA. Been at Ryanair 13 months in Aug!
Good luck to you all, especially the Gatwick lads...The Big Mac has destroyed Engineering and I hope he gets offered a directorship with SAP.
