Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Ryan Air off the runway in AAR

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Ryan Air off the runway in AAR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Feb 2006, 17:51
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SASKATTOON .. no need to jump to conclusions! Let the investigation tell what happened instead of accusing beforehand that SOP's where breached. Calm down man! And the incident happend during turning on the runway after landing according to the AArhus airport website.
PitotTube is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2006, 17:57
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah but, the metar may say BA poor but if the rwy was being swept then the crew may have been given a better value for the BA. In any account lets hope the IAA use the Reason model and look at the company culture as well as any crew actions that were involved in the incident.
Best foot forward is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2006, 17:58
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Deepest darkest Inbredland....
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Given the general discussion including mention of braking action, what happens what ATC cannot give a braking action figure either verbally or on motne. At present we are forbidden from passing any figures or guide by SRG.
terrain safe is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2006, 18:06
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ask the tower !
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One for Leo. How many investigations are currently being under taken in relation to Ryanair's operations
bacardi walla is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2006, 18:11
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: EIDW
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another Ryanair thread being dragged into the mud (no pun intended)..!!!!
Flame is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2006, 18:14
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Twilight Zone
Age: 57
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by HundredPercentPlease
STATEMENT
Flight FR712 from London Stansted .......... The aircraft suffered no damage and our engineers are on route to move the aircraft to the terminal building.
Rather a big fib isnt it...?

Aicraft on belly = damaged aircraft in my book.
Big Kahuna Burger is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2006, 18:51
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sussex, England
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How do you know the a/c is on its belly? Can you see from these pictures or are you guessing? My guess is that it isnt, just sunken in snow. But then again Im no accident investigator!!
Jambo Buana is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2006, 18:52
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: 59°45'36N 10°27'59E
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rather a big fib isnt it...?
Nahhh....according to the Airport Manager at Harstad Evenes (ENEV), the MyTravel bus that did some off roading there last winter, "did not sustain any damage what so ever". Veeery accurate........
And that was in a safety publication......

Management allways bend the truth to fit their agenda!
M609 is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2006, 18:59
  #29 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Right here
Age: 57
Posts: 79
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Århus airport/AAR/EKAH is open again.

Looking at the picture, there is air between the ground and the belly, so probobly no damage to the underside of the aircraft.
Miraculix is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2006, 19:56
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a few facts :

a/c not on belly

crew not aware of braking action poor, last given report was medium to good.

That's it ! No major thing, could have happened to anyone !!
Bounty 53 is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2006, 20:32
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Those of you out there who keep quoting half-hourly Metars have obviously had little or no experience of operating in hostile winter weather conditions. The Metars are of little relevance as far as braking action is concerned except for planning purposes.

In my job I frequently find myself in the hold while the airport authority treats the runway and then comes up with the very latest braking action.

Those of you who do not really understand these things should understand that the braking action given is only accurate for the time at which it was taken. Five minutes later things could be totally different as I have ALMOST found to my cost in the past!

Who was it who said "there but for the grace of God go I"?
JW411 is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2006, 20:42
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just out of interest, assuming the crew made an approach in good faith and they had the required preformance, what do you think will happen to them? Do you think this is enough to get the sack?

I feel nothing but sympathy but I'm just curious how an airline would treat this kind of incident??

Hufty.
Hufty is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2006, 20:43
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An observation

An observation from accidents and incident reports related to landings at contaminated runways - contaminated with slush, snow or ice. (period - last ten years). The accident and incidents selected are those from landings at contaminated runways where the info from air temperature, dewpoint temperature and precipitation has been available.
Info given: air-/dew temperature, delta T and precipitation
  • -1/1, 0, - SN
  • -3/-3, 0, -SN
  • -4/-4, 0, SN BLSN BR
  • -1/-1, 0, +SN
  • -1/-1, 0, -SN
  • 0/0, 0, SN
  • 0/0, 0, -DZFG
  • -8/-8, 0, FG
  • 0/0, 0, SNGR
  • 0/-1, 1, SHSN
  • -2/-3, 1, -FZDZ
  • 1/0, 1, SHSN
  • 1/0, 1, -SNRA
  • -2/-3, 1, +SNGR
  • 2/1, 1, -SHSN
  • 0/-1, 1, -SN
  • -1/-2, 1, -SN
  • -9/-10, 1, -SN
  • -1/-2, 1, -SN
  • -5/-7, 2, -SN
  • -2/-5, 2, -SN
  • 2/-1, 3, -SN
  • -3/-6, 3, SN
Do we see a trend here?
tribo is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2006, 21:23
  #34 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,150
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Do you think this is enough to get the sack?
That is outrageous! Not just 'wait for the inquiry' but 'give them the benefit of the doubt' and all the rest. No matter what you may think of FR as a company, have the decency to wait before having them sacked. Sheesh.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2006, 21:31
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Relax PAXboy!

I don't know what a company will do in this instance that's all! I know one crew that went off and they were absolved from blame and kept their jobs. I'm not sure what the industry norm is though (I only have one data point) and as a pilot I am keen to know.

If you interpret this as a company or crew bashing thing then you either can't read or haven't taken the time to read and understand my post.
Hufty is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2006, 23:30
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: uk
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Calm down JP, the last time i was in the hold over scandinavia and they were trying desperately to clear the runway they continuously updated the BA's for the runway.

Terrain Safe

Why are you not allowed to pass vital safety info to flight crew,? I can remember asking ATC for the crosswind component once and the said they wern't allowed to give it, yet in other parts of the world they are more than happy to.
Best foot forward is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2006, 09:30
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Norway
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anybody know why they didn't use the slides and got out quick? Or is Ryanair saving money here too?
metropolitan60 is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2006, 09:33
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Metropolitan60, if there's no risk of fire or other dangers, using the slides would be more risky to passengers' health, surely...
Non Normal is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2006, 10:01
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sunny Warwickshire
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We in ATC aren't allowed to give BA reports as unfortunately our MATS 1 states that the figures from the equipment are unreliable on anything other than an iced over runway. So if any de-icing / anti-icing has taken place then we end up with a wet / slush contaminated runway which means we can't use the official braking action figures from the equipment.

We are however allowed to pass an "unofficial" estimate of the BA from pilots of landing traffic.
radar707 is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2006, 11:27
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Radar 707,

Which means that some poor sucker is going to be the "guinea-pig".

However, I find it amazing, in the 21st century, that an airfield, licenced for international jet operations, (I assume yours is), does not have suitable equipment for the type of operations in use. Is it not the case that landing on ice covered runways is not allowed. I presume you mean ice patches etc etc.
RAT 5 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.