Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Heavy Landing at YMEL?

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Heavy Landing at YMEL?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Nov 2005, 11:54
  #41 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Flyboy, to clarify, the only video I've seen was from Ch9, and was shot from behind the aircraft at is descended to the RWY. Moments before touchdown, there appeared to be a sgnifficant right rudder deflection, which does not seem appropriate to a westerly wind.
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2005, 01:17
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dark side of the moon
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gusts or not, surely if the Xwind component was above the approved level for the A/C then the landing should not have been attempted, or a different runway selected.

I was stuck in the mess that followed trying to get out to my destination, along with all the others, and the ensuing Qantas re-routes etc. (I didn't envy that Ops department that day)

With any luck the airport and the other affected airlines will pass a large bill onto Thai for this one.

I don't understand why he didn't just go around, instead of causing so much inconvience to the other travellers, and distress to his own passengers.......
pprecious is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2005, 05:50
  #43 (permalink)  

Bottums Up
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: dunnunda
Age: 66
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I guess the thought of the inconvenience didn't occur to him.
Capt Claret is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2005, 05:53
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 35
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was there any thought there at all??

Or get in itis.
eman_resu is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2005, 08:54
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In Frozen Chunks (Cloud Cuckoo Land)
Age: 17
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
most people dont think they are going to 'near' crash, damage a runway, or a jet when they come in to land (and by implication the inconvenience to others). occasionally phuk ups happen. i think the word commonly used to describe these things is "accidents"

blueloo is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2005, 10:20
  #46 (permalink)  
Resident insomniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 79
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
>i think the word commonly used to describe these things is "accidents"

It's interesting that the universal expression used to describe 'collisions' in motoring is 'accidents', wheras 'accidents' in aviation are referred to as 'crashes'. Is there logic in this?
G-CPTN is offline  
Old 2nd Nov 2005, 22:00
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Capt Claret

You are correct there is only one video of the aircraft landing but the other videos are of the plane when it had come to a stop on the RNW. Sorry i should have been more spacific about the shots on Ch9. If you look at the report after the passengers are over exaggerating the "near death experience" it shows a picture of the plane on the RNW with alot of left delection (makes sence to me).

I know what you are trying to say i can see your point.

I think it was one of those things that happen's.

flyboycoxy is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2005, 00:48
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In Frozen Chunks (Cloud Cuckoo Land)
Age: 17
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
G-CPTN

or how bout the logic of a "near miss"...........shouldnt it be a near hit? ......
blueloo is offline  
Old 3rd Nov 2005, 09:30
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Wybacrik
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So tell us Coxy...when you say it's one of those things that happens...we should expect a prang every time we go flying should we?

You've done this before have you? flying that is!
amos2 is offline  
Old 4th Nov 2005, 18:51
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"It's interesting that the universal expression used to describe 'collisions' in motoring is 'accidents', wheras 'accidents' in aviation are referred to as 'crashes'. Is there logic in this?"

G-CPTN: Interestingly (well not very interestingly) the term 'accident' to describe road traffic incidents has been replaced in many UK police forces over the last several years by 'collision' or 'crash': 'accident' was felt to be inappropriate in cases where the collision was more than a 'mishap'.

Will shut up now.
HonestSLF is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.