Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

NWA A-320 Hail Damage

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

NWA A-320 Hail Damage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Apr 2005, 22:12
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NWA A-320 Hail Damage

Air Safety Week reporting that a NWA A-320 was severely damaged by hail near ATL in March. May have to be reskinned.

Any further info?
Shore Guy is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2005, 08:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There were two A320 hail incidents in Europe in approx 2003 & 2004 - MyTravel & BMI. So far as I can recall, both had shattered windscreens and damage to leading edges and engine intakes.

What is it about A320s and hail? Do other types ever get zapped like this?
bigbusdriver06 is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2005, 09:20
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: europe
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
???

Easyjet B737 about two years ago, severe hail damage A/C written off i believe!!
bluepilot is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2005, 09:22
  #4 (permalink)  

Uncle Pete
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Frodsham Cheshire
Posts: 915
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It happened to a Britannia 737 a few years ago over the Alps. I think was written off as well.
MaximumPete is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2005, 09:24
  #5 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bbd06 - try this link. the only common 'European' link is that it happened in Europe

NB You'll have to ignore the 'spotters' tantrums' there.

I saw the aircraft mentioned here and it was trashed!
BOAC is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2005, 11:38
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: London
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EZY B737-300 Hail Damage

The Ezy B733 wasn't written off...flown to FLS(now SRT) Dublin and had a month in intensive care - all DV windscreens shattered severe damage to skin, all leading edges replaced (including vert stab), engine nose cowls and to cap it off major body repair around FO's eyebrow window...I have heard tell of $750K in spares alone..Insurance paid out tho...
Cytherea is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2005, 17:19
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: EGGW
Posts: 2,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MaximumPete

It was more than a few years ago, more like over 30 years ago.
The aircraft was G-AXNC and was repaired.
Mr @ Spotty M is offline  
Old 15th Apr 2005, 18:06
  #8 (permalink)  

I am a figment of my own imagination
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

During a 727 maintainance period with Air France in Paris some years ago we parked next to a Syrian Arab Airlines 727 which had spent about 30 mins airborne and made an emergency return. Having been familiar with the well known pictures in met manuals of 'trashed' aircraft had been blissfully unaware of what could happen to 'large' aircraft. I was, besides being truely horrified, also baffled as to just how it had remained airborne at all. There were gaping holes in fuselage 'cheek' areas just aft of the cockpit. Radone and nose section substantialy damaged. All leading edges had suffered major damage and re-shaping. Controll surfaces had all sustained damage. Engine bullets pierced and flattened. Pitot tube fronts split and splayed out. Cockpit windows completely smashed outer layers gone. The fact that it had returned safely was testament to among other things Boeing's 'tank' build, and a salutory lesson on the destructive power of thunderstorms right by airports
I would venture in the cost-concious building of today the old overkill on structure has most likely given way to lighter and perhaps thinner construction. It might be interesting to speculate on relative damage to two airframes, ancient and modern, encountering a similar intensive encounter.
Paterbrat is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2005, 13:08
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
With all these so called trashed airplanes I'm not aware of any that have sustained a loss of control due to control surface damage.

The worst that I can recall were about 3 incidents with interior damage to engines from trying to process the hail at low power.

I would also think that replacing the leading edge surfaces/radomes and windscreens would be the appropriate repair along with dent removal to the upside surfaces if it was a ground incident.

So has there really been any scrap-out of underage big airplanes for this or were they already beyond their economic life?
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2005, 18:01
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dimpled golf balls fly better than smooth ones.
cwatters is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2005, 19:36
  #11 (permalink)  

I am a figment of my own imagination
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

'trashed' aircraft I was referring to were light aircraft. In the older US met manual it was a single piston Beech. In newer manuals it is a substantialy damaged AV8 which no doubt remained flyable. Know of some Jet aircraft that sustained some hail damage none that were written off. The Syrian Arab was at that time being restored by Boeing engineers to flying condition. The DC9 that encountered the extremely large storm in the US lost both engines but I seem to recollect did make a forced landing on a motorway, and obviously retained flying surfaces and controlls.

Yes dimpled golf balls do fly further there is an extremely interesting aerodynamic article which also goes into the optimum number and depth of those holes.
Paterbrat is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2005, 20:39
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: LGW
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Look on airliners.net, go to photo search and easyjet incidents, you have about 5 pics of the damage there
jettesen is offline  
Old 16th Apr 2005, 22:23
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Grobelling through the murk to the sunshine above.
Age: 60
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dimpled golf balls fly further because they spin backwards. In doing so the dimples help pull the airflow down at the rear of the ball, ie the aiflow along the upper surface travels further than that along the lower surface. Thus the spinning, dimpled ball creates an aerofoil effect, and gives itself some lift.

Aeroplane wings don't spin, so the dimples wouldn't help.
Pub User is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2005, 01:54
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: CYZV
Age: 77
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The US flight was Southern 242. They attempted to traverse what they thought was a saddle between two cells, but which because of radar attenuation was in reality a level 5 CB. Both engines were corncobbed, the radome was torn from the aircraft and both windshields were smashed, along with associated damage to all leading edges. They actually got the aircraft on the ground, on a rural highway, but they hit a light standard at a gas station with the right wing during the roll-out, and the aircraft veered into the pumps and caught fire.
The ground based radar return and a computer generated weather radar return of what - in all probability - they were looking at in the cockpit at the time they decided to fly that track, along with the CVR and ATC transcripts were part of a weather radar training course I once attended.
pigboat is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2005, 17:17
  #15 (permalink)  

I am a figment of my own imagination
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

It was a very interesting part of the weather course we were doing on the 727 course with Branniff at the time. I would submit that at the end the DC9 could perhaps be considered a 'TRASHED' aircraft.
Paterbrat is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.