Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Oil in the airconditioning!

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Oil in the airconditioning!

Old 9th Dec 2001, 21:19
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb Oil in the airconditioning!

A very interesting program on UK radio 4 right now!! In particular relating to Bae 146 and B757. Very interesting!
737man is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2001, 21:31
  #2 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Have a look at the following for details-- http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/progs/ge...ews.shtml#file
737man is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2001, 21:35
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

See THIS
snooky is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2001, 21:47
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Thanks Snooky- even more interesting! I flew the 146 for 13 years and had more flu-type bronchial illness than at any other period in my life. Some days we had to start the APU then get off the aircraft for a while whilst the initial oil burnt out of the system! At last the truth is coming out!
737man is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2001, 04:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: NZ
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Hmmm funny that, I still start that 146 APU every other day, and guess what, no fumes! But then, you don't get fumes if you maintain your APU, engines and AC packs properly! Not spraying de-icing fluid all over the APU bay helps too.

Bad as it is that the 146 has quite wrongly been saddled with a reputation for fumes problems, it is somewhat satisfying to see the number of serious incidents the 757 has had... kind of puts to bed the lie that this is a 146-specific problem...
Raw Data is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2001, 05:21
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Raw Data, I have eight different types on my licence, and the 146 is the only one that ever gave aircon fumes.

If it was just a matter of maintenance...exactly what ammount of maintenance is required such that operators from Europe to Australia to the US have all had the same complaint?
maxalt is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2001, 12:24
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: uk
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

This is not a type specific problem,just that some are more prone to contamination than others.bmir have had more than their fair share of incidents with the EMB145.
nitefiter is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2001, 13:16
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

RD,
Iīm so glad you take joy in other peoples missory, but your igonarance in this matter is obvious. On the 146, you donīt get fumes in the aircon for any other reason than that the APU is worn, any knowing YOUR fleet of 146īs it is astounding that you have never experienced Aircon smoke.
Brgds
Doc
P.S. Does your De-icing staff spray De-icing fluid into the APU bay ? and if so WHY ?????
DoctorA300 is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2001, 15:26
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 1,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Been smoked out on a 757. Air pressure seals on the engine core, apparently. Engine changed.
Sick as a dog for 3 days afterwards. Problem had been in the defects book for some time.
You could SEE the fumes when sparky came on board some 15 minutes after chocks.

Yes. The 757 has got a fumes problem history. Next time I WILL use the masks. Preety stupid not to have done it before.
blue up is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2001, 16:17
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Blue up, I'm not sure from your comment if you mean that a single event or several minor events occurred on your B757 fleet, but in the 146's I flew I was being poisoned every day.
And it worries me.

So far OK though. twitch twitch.
maxalt is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2001, 16:31
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: north of barlu
Posts: 6,207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

This 146 smoke in the air con has been overblown by the press , the fact is that eny aircraft that has a leaking seal in the engine/apu compressor will put smoke into the air con

The answer to the problem is to shut the suspect bleed valve , a problem with a pack is not likly to last very long as the bootstrap turbo compressor only carries about 1 USQT of oil and will seaze up when this is exhusted shutting down the pack likewise if you can determin which pack is playing up by looking at the indications then shut it down.
A and C is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2001, 17:31
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Stansted
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Not just the press making a meal out of the 146 APU - CAA AD002-03-01 came out this year, and Honeywell were swamped with U/S Aircon packs; so much so, that they've upped their Power by the Hour fee!!

As to the de-ice fluid, it runs down the fin when you de-ice, and what's at the base of the fin??? APU Intake!!!!!!!!!!! Takes about 30 secs to vapourise the water/alcohol mix, leaving a funny boozy smell on the flight deck......bit like when the crew are on board

There's a simple Mod out that introduces a little gutter above the intake - works quite well, apparently, so our mob are going to give it a try. Watch this space!
Greg Baddeley is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2001, 18:04
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: NZ
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

DoctorA300

Actually, it appears that you are the ignorant one- it can also come from the packs themselves.

I've read all the public domain stuff, as well as all the manufacturers briefings and the minutes of various conferences, not to mention industry-circulated reports and BAe bulletins, so one thing I am not is ignorant on the subject.

How you come to the conclusion that I take joy in others misery is bizarre to say the least. I'm interested in the facts, not emotive twaddle. The factsare that it is rare, and all but non-existent if the proper maintenance precautions are taken- which is why we haven't had a recurrence since introducing rigourous checks.
Raw Data is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2001, 05:56
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: europe
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Me, me me... I've done this, I've done that..
The problem with the air quality in aircraft is varied so much that everyone is scratching their head over it, and it isn't dependent on the type of aircraft.
All aircraft use the same type of systems/design with parts manufactured by same people.
All engines leak oil passed internal seals at one time or another, hell some of that 1 qtr-3qtr a day used must find it's way in to the air system?
some aircraft have catalytic converters, ie some 146's, and they do work.
Maintenance? you mean heavy maintanance? All depends on the operator and cost, which will affect how well the packs and the engines are maintained.
Any way i've seen, (been with) crew who had a heavy night, jumped in to an aircraft, they were so ill they grounded the aircraft on the basis of oil smell in cabin which caused them illness!!
same aeroplane Was tested for two days using air quality test equipment.nothing.
Hmmm. too many variebles me think.
schit.furbraen is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2001, 15:21
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: NZ
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

No-one is scratching their head.

The causes are well-known and extensively documented.

All aircraft CAN suffer from this problem, but some are more prone than others.

If your engines are using 1-3 quarts/day, they must be a little sick. Our 146s don't use anything like that much.

No, not heavy maintenance, simple inspections will do it.

No 146s have "catalytic converters".

The best test for contamination is to take a blood sample from an affected crewmember- sounds like the crew you were with might have had other "substances" in their blood than oil.

Very appropriate user name, BTW.
Raw Data is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2001, 17:23
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Stansted
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Now now, children, no squabbling..........some 146's DO have cats (HCM00723) but they don't work, and disintegrate in the pipes, causing a nice shower of bits out of the back; so SB71-056-50217A has come out to delete them! We're doing it over the next two years.
Greg Baddeley is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2001, 17:20
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Stansted
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Oh yes; and change to a fourth generation oil like Mobil Jet 291 - much less toxic!
Greg Baddeley is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2001, 17:33
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: europe
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

yes they are. have to modify aircraft to stop this.
you mentioned 146's again?
they do have catalysers fitted. on some just passed the bleed port.
and the engine will use +1 qrt on a 10 hr day. on a good engine. if only people logged these properly you would know.
and thanks for my name.
Why on many flights the crew are sick/ill and not the pax?

[ 12 December 2001: Message edited by: schit.furbraen ]
schit.furbraen is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2001, 04:04
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Timbuktu
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Well let's see now Shitforbrains.
Do you think it could be anything to do with the fact that a passenger may be exposed for 30 or 40 minutes while a crew member is likely to be dosed four or five times that in a day...every day?
Duh.....
maxalt is offline  
Old 14th Dec 2001, 05:42
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: europe
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

DUH?
I know that. I was refering to the crew complaining about anything all the time. in 20 years I haven't been sick yet. If it isn't the oil smell, it's the yaw damper, if it isn't the yaw damper it is shimmy, if it isn't... pay, working hours, contracts, F/O's, pension, other airlines... other pilots...etc.
it is fashionable to complain about what other pilots are complaining about.
I know. I do the same.
schit.furbraen is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.