Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

China Eastern Tailstrike LHR 31/03

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

China Eastern Tailstrike LHR 31/03

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Apr 2005, 15:49
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Azerbaijan
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tailstrikes happen and the correct response is as below :

NTSB Identification: NYC05LA054
Scheduled 14 CFR Part 121: Air Carrier operation of CONTINENTAL AIRLINES INC
Accident occurred Wednesday, March 02, 2005 in Newark, NJ
Aircraft: Boeing 777-200, registration: N78008
Injuries: 214 Uninjured.

This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed.

On March 2, 2005, at 1550 eastern standard time, a Boeing 777-200, N78008, operated by Continental Airlines as flight 99, experienced a tail strike departing from the Newark Liberty International Airport (EWR), Newark, New Jersey. There were no injuries to the 2 certificated airline transport flight crewmembers, 2 relief flight crewmembers, 12 flight attendants, or 198 passengers. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and an instrument flight rules (IFR) flight plan had been filed for the flight destined for Hong Kong, China. The flight was a scheduled international passenger flight, conducted under 14 CFR Part 121.

According to a representative of the operator, the airplane was departing from runway 4R, an 11,000 foot-long, 150 foot-wide, asphalt runway. As the airplane was rotated, it lifted off the runway, momentarily settled back to the ground, and lifted off a second time. Suspecting that the tail of the airplane struck the ground, the pilot elected to return to the airport, where it landed uneventfully.

A Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) inspector and representatives of Boeing and the operator examined the airplane after the accident. Scrape marks were observed on the underside of the airplane's tail section. Further examination revealed substantial damage to the aft pressure bulkhead.

The winds recorded at EWR, at 1551, were from 320 degrees, at 23 knots, gusting to 27 knots.
foldbackyourtables is offline  
Old 5th Apr 2005, 15:54
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So have the Chinese made any comment on this yet? Do the UK CAA have the right to question the actions of the crew given that this could have devastating consequences if the aircraft had come down?
brabazon is offline  
Old 6th Apr 2005, 02:27
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do 340's have tailscrape bumpers?

No they don't. It's just fuselage skin.
skycoolie is offline  
Old 7th Apr 2005, 17:53
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: n5318w00857 !
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heathrow movements can be found at http://www.lhr-lgw.co.uk/heathrow/lhrmainindex.htm .

CES552 B2383 A343 ZSPD 2038 212 09R

So, at 2138 LT China Eastern Flight 552 departed from 09R, registration B-2383, an Airbus A340-300.

L.
n5205e00421 is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2005, 15:35
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow China eastern Tailstrike LHR 31/03

Just to confirm this A/C did not return to LHR with a reported problem.
john129401 is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2005, 16:56
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: paradise
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
........ and what is the CAA doing about it ?
Five Livers is offline  
Old 8th Apr 2005, 17:36
  #47 (permalink)  

Eight Gun Fighter
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Western Approaches
Posts: 1,126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, amongst all the eyes here, has anyone seen B-2383 since the tailstrike?
Rollingthunder is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2005, 04:46
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From A320 QRH:

LAND ASAP
- MAX FL ......100 or MSA
[Limit cabin rate of climb and descent]
- RAM AIR ...... ON
- PACK 1 and 2 ...... OFF


Enough said. Could it have been a trim adjustment? For example, trim DN3.0 being entered as UP3.0? That would produce nose up at lower than expected speed, stick forward (to level?), then relaxing to a draggy nose up again.... Sounds possible.

But not following the QRH? Oh dear, oh dear....
Arrowhead is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2005, 07:58
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sometimes here, sometimes there
Posts: 440
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
A week ago the aircraft was parked on the remote Southern apron at Shanghai Pudong. So maybe it is bent

At least it made it that far.......
Variable Load is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2005, 08:14
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good god VL, so the aircraft is now parked and yet it flew home after this incident?? Incredible....

Maybe the CAA made a very curt phonecall to the CAAC....
Clipper One is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2005, 13:52
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool A340-300 in Shanghai Airline hangar

Saw a China Eastern A340 in the Shanghai Airines hangar at Pudong PVG airport, guess its sick!
greenmeenie is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.