Atlas - Stansted - Dec. 12,2004
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Atlas - Stansted - Dec. 12,2004
Anyone have any more information?
NTSB Identification: DCA05WA020
Nonscheduled 14 CFR Part 121: Air Carrier operation of ATLAS AIR INC
Incident occurred Sunday, December 12, 2004 in London, United Kingdom
Aircraft: Boeing 747, registration: N523MC
Injuries: 3 Uninjured.
On December 12, 2004, an Atlas cargo Boeing 747 descended well below approach path at about 6nm from Runway 05 at Stansted International Airport, London, United Kingdom. There were no injuries to the three crewmembers or damage to the airplane or other structures. The incident is being investigated by the United Kingdom Air Accident Investigation Branch.
NTSB Identification: DCA05WA020
Nonscheduled 14 CFR Part 121: Air Carrier operation of ATLAS AIR INC
Incident occurred Sunday, December 12, 2004 in London, United Kingdom
Aircraft: Boeing 747, registration: N523MC
Injuries: 3 Uninjured.
On December 12, 2004, an Atlas cargo Boeing 747 descended well below approach path at about 6nm from Runway 05 at Stansted International Airport, London, United Kingdom. There were no injuries to the three crewmembers or damage to the airplane or other structures. The incident is being investigated by the United Kingdom Air Accident Investigation Branch.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Blighty - On secondment
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any one have any more information....
We will get right back to you on this one and as soon as we have something we will post a reply.
best regards,
United Kingdom Air Accident Investigation Branch
We will get right back to you on this one and as soon as we have something we will post a reply.
best regards,
United Kingdom Air Accident Investigation Branch
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whats going on @Atlas/Polar?
1. this one
2. RWY-Overrun in NYC
3. RWY-Overrun in DUS
4. ....ANY MORE INCIDENTS TO BE PUBLISHED????.......
Is this just bad luck or this there a real problem with Crew-Trng etc?
1. this one
2. RWY-Overrun in NYC
3. RWY-Overrun in DUS
4. ....ANY MORE INCIDENTS TO BE PUBLISHED????.......
Is this just bad luck or this there a real problem with Crew-Trng etc?
Just another number
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 1,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Apparently it was going to be an item on the TV evening news on the 15th but then Mr Blunkett resigned and so it was pushed out. Luckily (for Atlas) the tabloids didn't latch on to it.
Airclues
Airclues
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: York International
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
STN radar missed it at the time of the occurrence. I understand it was only brought to light by an unusual number of noise complaints! Looked back at the radar tapes to find it, the crew had kept quiet so not interviewed until a couple of days later. 500ft at 6 miles, maybe they were ex CX!
"Stansted Radar missed it at the time of the occurence"
I find that statement quite amazing. They (and Essex Radar) seem to be very able to pick up instantly on an apparent +/-10 knot change in speed or to point out that the latest ATIS is "Lima" when "Kilo" is still being broadcast.
Are you trying to tell me that they failed to spot a B747 about to spear into the ground 6 miles out?
As a Stansted user I find this quite frightening.
I find that statement quite amazing. They (and Essex Radar) seem to be very able to pick up instantly on an apparent +/-10 knot change in speed or to point out that the latest ATIS is "Lima" when "Kilo" is still being broadcast.
Are you trying to tell me that they failed to spot a B747 about to spear into the ground 6 miles out?
As a Stansted user I find this quite frightening.
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: London Whipsnade Wildlife Park
Posts: 5,038
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Something odd here, transfer this thread to the ATC forum and let the folk likely to have any direct knowledge of this 'incident', comment?
If a 747 came to be 500ft above the ground at 5 miles from touch down, folk in that forum could probably speculate better?
If a 747 came to be 500ft above the ground at 5 miles from touch down, folk in that forum could probably speculate better?