Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

easyJet - pilot tested over the limit?

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

easyJet - pilot tested over the limit?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Jan 2005, 17:00
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: London
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
flapless,

Others have already pointed out that my first words were not to be taken as sincere, and I agree with Wizofoz's analysis.

I hope - no, I'm sure - that your new rostering system will solve all your problems, after all, the 'new rostering systems' that have been churned in and out in the last seven years or so in your company have invariably worked beautifully and to always to the pilots' benefits.

(That, again, was sarcasm, just in case you still couldn't spot it).

A quick call to the T&G office in Luton will confirm that there are (and have been for some time) a number of easyJet pilots who are members of that union, as was the pilot who was assisted by them some time ago.

Oh, and I'll stay in the conversation when it suits me, thanks all the same for your offer!
Astronomy Dominie is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 17:22
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In the sticks
Posts: 9,881
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well the story has just made the BBC 6 o'clock news
LTNman is online now  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 18:03
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: london/UK
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Final 3 Greens

I hate to disappoint.....

It may have escaped your notice, but this happened in Germany, it is therefore a matter of how the German Police and Prosecution Authority chose to proceed. Nothing to do with UK law and how that is enforced.(although there are circumstances when she could be prosecuted under UK law)

In any event, yes, law is passed to be obeyed, if not, then yes it gets enforced. As for impingement on life style? Well depends on your life style doesn't it? I don't drink often, so the UK legislation would make no change to my world. Others drink more, but with some care they can easily avoid being over the limit for flying or driving.

As far as I can find, there are no airline accidents where alcohol was involved in the UK. That may be different in other parts of the world.

If you do some research, you will find that the CAA asked for the UK legislation to be introduced as a result of a recommendation from AAIB in respect of a light aircraft accident. (Pauses for howls of indignation). Common sense says you cannot have one rule for private pilots and one for airline pilots. Hence the law applies to both, in the same way as a bus driver is subject to the same drinking driving laws as a car driver is.

As to the levels, I have no idea why Europe decided they were the levels that should be set, but they did, the CAA and Government adopted that level as a result. In any event, it really doesn't matter as both the pilots so far dealt with in the UK were well over that limit.

As to this lady being drunk, I doubt she was. Having said that, I have known people arrested as the result of a breath test result of about the same level who were certainly also unfit to drive also.
bjcc is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 18:29
  #64 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
BJCC

I was just being playful, thus the :-) icon. As (you are) a police officer, I realise that you must enforce the laws passed by the government of the day, regardless of your personal feelings.

The condundrum seems to be how an individual tests their own compliance, accurately and thus avoids becoming a criminal.

I do fnd it ironic that the people who pass such laws in this country have bars in the workplace and apparently use them on duty.

Last edited by Final 3 Greens; 12th Jan 2005 at 18:41.
 
Old 12th Jan 2005, 19:04
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: the world is my oyster
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Final 3 Greens,
I think you'll find BJCC is no longer in the police, although when asked when he left by myself, he wouldn't answer.

You'd be forgiven for thinking he was indeed plodding away given the flavour of his answers.
However for someone who tries to write in precise terms re the law and its application, he does make some howlers.
The idea of drunkeness re driving law in the UK has no definition.The merely differentiates as to whether tou are over the limit, or whether you are "unfit" either through drink or drugs.
The analogy of the Public Sevice Vehicle-busdriver-and the car driver is not quite so simple.
Same law yes, but eg in the case of a bus driver with schoolchildren on board, the penalties would be much more severe.
With aviation, things are simpler with in effect a zero tolerence approach.
There is a concept of he idea of public responsibility that an airline pilot should have to his pax which seperates the probable punishment notwithstanding the same legislation applies
mach79 is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 19:10
  #66 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mach

Thanks for the pointer - having revisited BJCCs profile, I see he is "air traffic", which conjures up irreverent memories of Dan Akroyd in a T38 complete with "Blues & twos!"
 
Old 12th Jan 2005, 19:10
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: london/UK
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Final 3 Greens

Who would these people who have bars and use them on duty be?

I was a Police officer, no longer.

I agree with the condundrum, but one or 2 glasses 8-12 hours before you fly, or work isn't going to be there in the morning. 10 pints then you are running a big risk. The problem is the area in between. It may not be a popular thing to say, but being careful, or going without is really the only way....It all comes down to what someone values most, thier job or a drink.

As to feeling safer? Well, I arrested a pilot, turned out to be just over the drink drive limit, on his way into LHR one afternoon. He insisted his driving was not affected (it was, it was crap which is why he was stopped). He didn't fly that afternoon, mostly because he spent a fair amount of it sat in the Police station but to be honest I wouldn't want him flying me or my family, so if this deters him then great.
bjcc is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 19:11
  #68 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
BJ

Did you ever see his driving when he was sober ?
 
Old 12th Jan 2005, 19:33
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: london/UK
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Final 3 Greens

If he drove like that sober, then he would never have passed a driving test.

mach79

I ignored your question, because it's not relevent.
Any more than your claims to be 'more senior' than PC are, or your reasons for no longer being.

If you want to turn this into a slanging match, feel free, to do it elsewhere.

You are right, there are 2 offences as you stated, and your point is?

As regards to the bus driver, the fact he had passengers on board would lead to a stiffer penelty, in exactly the same way, I would guess that a private pilot would get a lower penelty to an airline pilot with the same BAC reading. However time will tell on that score.

Last edited by bjcc; 12th Jan 2005 at 19:51.
bjcc is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 19:57
  #70 (permalink)  
I've only made a few posts so I don't feel the need to order a Personal Title and help support PPRuNe
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Danger

Oh for heavens sake, who woke bjcc up? Do we have to endure the endless replies that try to whittle the argument down to its sub atomic particle levels with comparisons to bus drivers and whatever? Give us a break. If you're going to post your opinion then at least give it 12-24 hours before you jump in with your 'last word' analasys instead of trying to reply to every post as it appears. It makes the thread ever so dull when we have to hear [sic] the monotonous and never ending drone of one mans reminiscing about when he was a plod and the law actually means this or that. Can't you just point us to previous threads on similar topics where you have dragged a dead subject up umpteen times with your stock answers.

I'll get me hat now.
cargo boy is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 19:59
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: western europe
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I do find it ironic that the people who pass such laws in this country have bars in the workplace and apparently use them on duty
Answer? .... the Houses of Parlament of course

Our own Parlament has a number of Bars and were recently discovered to have never been "Licensed" after xxx knows how many years of operation

Last edited by hobie; 13th Jan 2005 at 09:49.
hobie is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 20:08
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cargo

He's a policeman.

He has to have the last word.

And you have to agree with him.
behind_the_second_midland is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 20:10
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: the world is my oyster
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BJCC,
You ignored my question because you wouldn't have liked the answer you would have to have given because it would have given the date you joined-and no, Z-Cars probably wasn't on TVwhile you pounded your beat-correct?

Thanks for telling me I was right about drink driving legislation son.Only thing is, I was was probably reading ot while you were still at school.
Re your question"The point is?" , the point is the definition of being drunk is nowhere to be mentioned.When you said that you doubted she was drunk, it was meaningless.

Regards testing the pilot, you appear to write with such relish, that you seem to have issues re pilots that will probably cause you problems in your new chosen career.
mach79 is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 20:51
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: United States
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Captain Morgan, indeed!
eight iron special is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 21:06
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What has annoyed me reading through the posts has been the reaction of some pilots to this "rumour and news" posting which was pretty obvious to be genuine from the start

I wonder what would your response would be if you had a child on a bus that was going to be driven by someone caught under the influence, would you mind if the story was out in the open as soon as?

The days of keeping things quiet until proven guilty are over.

I genuinly feel sorry for her and maybe airlines and unions should be taking more steps to understand why it seems to be happening more often, if indeed it is.
CHIVILCOY is offline  
Old 12th Jan 2005, 23:19
  #76 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 'An Airfield Somewhere in England'
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Astro Domine (ex nav per chance?), as I stated previously easyJet have not made any attempt to hide this incident from their employees.

You seem to be suggesting that easyJet are misleading everyone in that there has been previous drink/flying incidents involving pilots within the company. Pilot members of the TGWU are extremely rare (I have met one in my whole career), but you are suggesting that a number of pilots have used the T&G to somehow assist them to escape from retribution in previous incidents. I personally am not aware of a single other incident of this kind in easyJet's history, nor am I aware of any pilot ever attempting to fly whilst 'under the influence' and it subsequently being hushed up. You, however, appear to have the advantage of me. Despite not appearing to be either a commerical pilot or an employee of easyJet your 'insight' into all that goes on within the company is remarkable. It is quite simple - either easyJet or you is not telling the truth. You are hiding under a cloak of anonimity to make exremely serious and unsubstantiated allegations. You should either clarify your previous claim or withdraw it completely.
Norman Stanley Fletcher is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2005, 09:56
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: A25R
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This world seems to full of self righteous twits with ready commentary on a subject of which they know very little but such is the pilots' lot I guess. It was until relatively recently that, should you have been sitting in a french cockpit, a glass wine would have been an integral part of the crew meal. Lots of pranged french aircraft everywhere ? I don't think so.
autobrake3 is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2005, 10:13
  #78 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Autobrake

It was from this knowledge, as a long time pax user of AF (and others) that prompted my earlier comment that I don't feel any safer because of this new legislation.

There are plenty of reasons that I do feel safer, e.g. new generation aircraft, more experience operating jet aircraft and learning the lessons (as 411a recently pointed out about upsets), better nav kit etc etc

Hope I'm not one of the opinionated twits you mention
 
Old 13th Jan 2005, 11:33
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Just over there....no there.
Age: 61
Posts: 364
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was all over the German national television news last night.
hasn't done any of any favours I'm afraid.
CyclicRick is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2005, 11:58
  #80 (permalink)  
MPD
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry, new to all this - first post. Can I ask what will happen to the pilot concerned? Will there be criminal charges, or will they lose their licence?
MPD is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.