Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Santa Maria HF c alling for REECH-1005

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Santa Maria HF c alling for REECH-1005

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Dec 2004, 14:45
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post USAF R/T procedures

HI all, just a quick follow-up. Recently separated (this year) after ten years flying USAF C-130s all over the world. The problem is indeed what one post mentions. The AF has yet to install SelCal on its 130 fleet. We were (and still are) forced to continuously monitor HFs that, in accordance with generally accepted government contracting practices, are of inferior quality. End result? Repeated radio calls that you can hear because the 130 crew cannot receive the reply.

Trust me, as annoying as it may be to listen to them from another aircraft, the AF crews are infinitely more annoyed...

Cheers,
Viliamu is offline  
Old 30th Dec 2004, 23:25
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
BusyB > I'd much rather hear all the hot air on this thread being used in favour of a much better system than HF, there has to be one!<

SatCom, Data Link as a starter?

All proves that speech RT is probably one of the worst communications systems - all the more reason to stick to standard phraseology etc.
fireflybob is offline  
Old 31st Dec 2004, 06:01
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Redistributing SLF
Age: 65
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I was taught NATS proceedures by TWA people who had flown the Connie across the Atlantic. I was taught to do it right. I still occasionally make mistakes.

One night a couple of months ago I flew from WAW-DUS-MXP. I worked the radio on those legs and I was a disaster! The guy flying had to cover for me on 75% of the calls. I just wasn't used to flying around Europe. It takes a while to adjust.

Unless you are operating exclusively onutside the U.S., it's difficult to maintain proper radio disipline(the U.S. ATC system being weak in that regard). Maintaining currency in that area of operations is difficult if you don't do it frequently.

I can't speak for the military but it seems many civilian operators in the U.S. just don't take communications seriously enough.

Always trying to improve.TC
AA717driver is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2005, 01:21
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh my Gosh....

The USAF lost again...

My tax dollars at work, training the few who, by this time, should sure as hell know how to make position reports in a respectable fashion, and not sound like an eight year old child, doing so.

Good grief......

PS: Affirmative action at work.
411A is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2005, 11:39
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Must say that there is far too much inane "chat",especially in US airspace.
Why do US carriers insist on asking for ride reports every 5 minutes,even when the air is as smooth as a baby's behind ?
And why do we have to be subjected to "Have you got the score for the big game please"-you know the one,when the Boston Badgers are playing the Pittsburgh Potbellies
LightTwin Driver is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2005, 12:00
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,829
Received 273 Likes on 111 Posts
I gather that someone once tried asking London Information for the result of some footie match or other - and was very quickly told "NO!"

But a call was received a few years ago at Brize Ops asking which horse had won some particular race..... As it came from a certain red Andover and was of great interest to the horse's owner - their rather important passenger - the Ops guys quickly checked the teletext news to find out!

I sympathise with those USAF guys who don't have SelCal - it must be dreadfully fatiguing having to listen to all the HF noise for hours at a time in something slow like a C130. Surely it's a safety hazard? Or have they got some gucci automatic position reporting data link?
BEagle is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2005, 17:57
  #67 (permalink)  
ZbV
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Samsonite
Age: 51
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Arrow

Ferrying light airplanes many moons ago listening to HF for hours was the norm. Longest flight I ever did was 18h 6min.

Our HF system was at best rather crude and you could not get it hooked to the aircraft audio system.

JJ
JJflyer is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2005, 18:11
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Beagle
I flew MAC from '71-'78, over 100 hrs/month, sometimes...usually involving a Pacific or Atlantic leg. Selcal was not provided, and as I said, had we not turned down the volume between required calls, and hoped for the best, I'd have busted FAA physicals hearing exams starting 27 years ago. This might give some insight as to why USAF flights don't respond (quickly, or at all) to HF calls. Very bad practice, but all the alternatives were bad. $800 for toilet seats, but no selcal!

Also, back then, were were told in '72 that HF would no longer be used in the North Atlantic after '75...or was my hearing that bad already!
Semaphore Sam is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2005, 18:38
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
>>Also, back then, were were told in '72 that HF would no longer be used in the North Atlantic after '75...or was my hearing that bad already!<<

Yep, I remember exactly the same prediction in the '70's "don't worry son, this will all be on the satellites in five years..."

Kinda like a few years ago when they were going to shut down all ground based navaids in the U.S. and go to GPS.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 1st Jan 2005, 18:42
  #70 (permalink)  
Trash du Blanc
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: KBHM
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
American carriers ask for ride reports because they can be sued for turbulence-caused personal injury - and even threatened with FAA violations - happened to a UAL whale crew back in the nineties.
Huck is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2005, 12:29
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Huck,

American carriers ask for ride reports because they can be sued for turbulence-caused personal injury - and even threatened with FAA violations - happened to a UAL whale crew back in the nineties.
Fair point,but then so could European carriers.
I suppose the culture is different in the States where it seems you can be sued for even breaking a finger nail !!

Is it a FAA requirement to know the result of the "Big Game" too ?

(Are there any "Small" games played?)
LightTwin Driver is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2005, 16:31
  #72 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Guys,
I started this topic a few weeks ago and since that time I was flying.
Now I come back and see all these posts!!
But my actual question was... Did anyone hear about the Reach1005.
I think the American RT is quite operational. No problem with it at all. Their controllers are always very helpfull and willing to give directs.
I dont mention that in Europe! Well... Less atleast!

Its dinndertime here... Everybody take care in 2005 and happy landings

Cheers
Skylark3
Skylark3 is offline  
Old 4th Jan 2005, 18:59
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Eagan, MN
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, Skylark3
Figure. If you haven't heard of a USAF transport down in the last few weeks, he made it ok. Also, your question concerned his lack of response....if you've read the posts, as you inferred, you'd have concluded that it's highly likely he wasn't monitoring his HF ver efficiently, for physiological reasons (Pain in the Ears), and thus missed the call(s). This has been going on for at least 35 years, and there must be some good excuse for the US military knowingly endangering their own and other enroute aircraft by not providing Selcal in HF areas.
Semaphore Sam is offline  
Old 5th Jan 2005, 22:16
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
zero zero, don't think for one minute that those previous responses are from "perfect" pilots. Some of them might not even be pilots...
I have recently heard absolutely terrible R/T from various Flag Carriers during an Atlantic crossing and I strongly doubt if any of them were born with an ATPL pinned to their crib.
We all have to learn somewhere and we all make mistakes somewhere along the line, hopefully not big ones.
Live and learn
Latte tester is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2005, 23:33
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Posts: 518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up Thank you sir.

Sorry for the late reply, I've been busy crossing the Atlantic. Three times in one week!! You can bet my R/T is quite polished by now.

Now if I could just learn to stay awake!
zerozero is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2005, 06:01
  #76 (permalink)  

Left Seat 747
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Malaysia
Age: 80
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Danny

Your comments about the childish taunting that occur regularly in these forums is right on the mark. I am appalled at the bashing that regularly goes on among "professional" pilots.

If the frequency is guiet at 2:00 AM the occassional "Have a nice day" by the pilot leaving the frequency or "happy landings" by the Turkish controller to the departing flight is not out of order, or a safety issue in my opinion. Notice I said "if the frequency is quiet."

Relative to the "Reach" aircraft, I have spent more than an hour on more than one occasion trying to get somebody on HF in the middle of the ocean to no avail. Sometimes, you just can't get through. So you try to get a relay and do a position report in the blind. We have all been there!
Flying Guy is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2005, 08:56
  #77 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: universe
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Couple of days back heard Jeddah controller going crazy calling a reech aircraft, with no reply, for at least 20 mins. The guys climbed from FL220 to FL330 without clearance. Lots of aircraft vectored out of his way. It then took about 10 mins for these guys to understand their routing, blocking the freq for everyone else, embarassing is not the word. Nobody was surprised cause they do this stuff all the time, ask anyone who flys in the gulf region. When you hear them you pay extra special attn to TCAS.
vfenext is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2005, 13:41
  #78 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Holland
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guys,

Please stop overreacting !

I've been flying intercontinental for 14 years now. These "reach"guys do quite a good job on R/T.

Stop bugging them please.
slam_dunk is offline  
Old 16th Jan 2005, 20:03
  #79 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Moon
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For what it's worth chaps if you do not reply to the R/T in U.K especially in the Upper Air ,certain wheels may start to be put in motion.Ironically it is our U.S cousins who appear to be the worst offenders.

AyrTC
AyrTC is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2005, 10:22
  #80 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: west of the Tamar
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

For what it's worth, I can recall a retired captain from a US major airline telling me that at times, some of the most difficult ATC to understand were instructions given by Scottish and Welsh controllers in UK airspace, on account of their strongly accentuated English!

I've often heard virtually unintelligable RT emanating from a certain UK lo-cost airline due to a combination of excessively fast speech and word slurring. IMHO the problem of poor RT isn't the fault of any particular group or nationality of flyers.
kala87 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.