Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

KLM off the runway at BCN?

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

KLM off the runway at BCN?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Dec 2004, 09:37
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 2,801
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
These links may not work from here, but lets try:
Photo 1
Photo 2
Photo 3
Jhieminga is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2004, 18:12
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: EIDW
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mike, thanks.
Phoenix_X is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2004, 10:08
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: somewhere in the EU
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also these pics:

Pic 2

Pic 4

Pic 5

Pic 6

Pic 7
iceman51 is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2004, 10:30
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: EGBG & LPPR
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any decision on the future of the airframe, is it destined to be recycled.....?
foxile is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2004, 19:10
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: EIDW
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cpt. Kaos, the reason why I posted the link is because the thread specifically indicates NO DIRECT LINKS to the picture due to server load. Otherwise, I would have done so myself.

As stated before. I don't know why my previous post was deleted.
Phoenix_X is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2004, 10:25
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: near an airplane
Posts: 2,801
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Gossip from a usually trustworthy source says that PH-BTC will not fly again. Repairs are deemed to be too expensive.
Jhieminga is offline  
Old 17th Dec 2004, 11:51
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Mallorca
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Judging from Diana's airshot (or is that word more applicable to my golf?!) 20 yards more sliding would have made for a VERY nasty result. Lucky chaps, methinks....
Cameronian is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2005, 00:09
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing released excerpts of the BOI findings to operators today - typical, just bloody typical Boeing - their product suffers a mechanical failure brought on by a bird-strike and they blame........................................the pilot; for not recognizing that the bird-strike that he had out of AMS (that he very possibly wasn't aware of) had caused a nose-wheel steering control cable to shear. Here's the drivel:
FROM: THE BOEING COMPANY
21-Sep-2005 16:44:36 US PACIFIC TIME

PRODUCT TYPE: Airplane
PRODUCT LINE: 737
PRODUCT: 737-400
ATA: 0230-00
PART NUMBER:

REFERENCES:
/A/ SR 1-111721075 Dated 10 Aug 2005
/B/ 737-300/400/500/600/700/800/900 Flight Crew Training Manual (FCTM), Page 8.30 , Situations Beyond the Scope of Non-Normal Checklists, Flight Path Control Dated 31 October 2004

SUBJECT: 737-400 PH-BTC Runway Excursion during Landing, Barcelona, Spain - 28 November 2004

Final Final Final Final

The Spanish Civil Aviation Accident and Incident Investigation Commission (CIAIAC) has investigated the subject accident with assistance from the Dutch Transportation Safety Board (TSB), the U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), the Operator and Boeing. The CIAIAC has published their final report, which can be accessed on the following web site:
http://www.fomento.es/NR/rdonlyres/0..._070_A_ENG.pdf

The following is an extract from the report:
Quote
3.2. Causes
It is considered that the accident probably happened because during the takeoff a bird strike broke one of the cables of the nose wheel steering system of the aircraft and jammed the other, which made that the nose wheels were rotated to the left during landing, causing a veering to the left that could not be arrested by full rudder deflection as the aircraft decelerated. The subsequent application of brakes and other actions by the crew could not avoid that the aircraft went outside the runway surface.

The damages to the aircraft were increased by the condition of the runway strip due to the airport construction works.

Contributing to the breaking of the cable was the fact that it was severely worn locally. The wear could be traced back to the incorrect application of grease to the cable system during maintenance. Despite the training and experience of the flight crew, they were unable to quickly recognize the possible cause of the deviation of the aircraft and to keep the aircraft on the runway.
End quote

On page 73 of the report, there are two recommendations addressed to Boeing. These recommendations are repeated below with Boeing's responses.

Quote
Recommendation 20/05: It is recommended to The Boeing Company that a service information letter or similar document is sent to all the operators of Boeing 737 aircraft to make flight crews and maintenance personnel aware of the hazardous effects that a bird impact in the area of the NLG could have in the nose wheel steering system, and that precautionary measures should be taken in this case. This letter should also highlight the importance to strictly follow the instructions of document 737-FTD-32-03008 in order to avoid the wear of the NWS cables.
End quote

Boeing Response: Boeing has addressed the above recommendation in the following manner. The reference a) message was released to all 737 operators following the subject event. A copy of this message can be obtained from your local Boeing Field Service Representative or the Airline Support Manager(s) assigned to your airline.

Quote
Recommendation 21/05: It is recommended to The Boeing Company that supplementary training instructions are provided to operators of Boeing 737 to allow flight crews to quickly identify a possible NWS malfunction during landing and to advise them of the expected performance of the aircraft and of the measures that should be taken to avoid losing directional control at high speeds.
Endquote

Boeing Response: Boeing has addressed the above recommendation in the following manner. As detailed in the reference a) message, 737 operators were advised that bird strikes such as the one in the subject event can potentially damage and/or displace Nose Wheel Steering (NWS) cables, thus affecting the landing roll. After an event affecting NWS, the nose wheel may be deflected. The amount of deflection and its effect on directional control of the airplane on the ground depend on the nature of the failure. Similar exposure to un-commanded NWS deflection exists on other Boeing models. Therefore, operators are directed to the following guidance in heritage Boeing Flight Crew Training Manuals (FCTM), similar to the Reference b):

Situations Beyond the Scope of Non-Normal Checklists

"Aggressive differential braking and/or use of asymmetrical reverse thrust, in addition to other control inputs, may be required to maintain directional control."

Boeing believes this general guidance is the only sound instruction and training advice that can be provided to crews to accommodate demanding situations that require the use of various controls to prevent drift and possible runway excursion. These situations include but are not limited to blown tires, collapsed main landing gear, strong crosswinds on dry runways, thrust reverser anomalies, icy patches on runways, seized brakes and nose wheel steering anomalies including jammed steering metering valves and the kind associated with the subject accident.

R. S. Breuhaus, Chief Engineer, Air Safety Investigation BOEING
Take it as given - if you prang a Boeing (or an Airbus for that matter) they are going to come after you & prove that it was your incompetence (at whatever level) & not their product that led to the sudden end of the flight
Roundout is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2005, 06:30
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Attic
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And how exactly are you supposed to know your nose gear steering cable has sheared _after_ the wheels have left the ground on takeoff??
A-FLOOR is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2005, 07:54
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Just South of the last ice sheet
Posts: 2,681
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Surely it's not beyond the wit of man to fit deflector shields to exposed cables which, when damaged, have the capacity to wreak havoc?
LowNSlow is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2005, 10:47
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: The Attic
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
... or design the nose gear assy to be without exposed cables in the first place... or reroute them to go along the rear of the main strut, keeping them out of the way of any stray pigeon, supercooled water droplets, etc ...

A-FLOOR is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2005, 08:06
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: down-route
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely Boeing are just acting on the recommendation from the Spanish CIAIAC. The final CIAIAC report contains following @rse-covering statement:

"It is recommended to The Boeing Company that a service information letter or similar document is sent to all the operators of Boeing 737 aircraft to make flight crews and maintenance personnel aware of the hazardous effects that a bird impact in the area of the NLG could have in the nose wheel steering system, and that precautionary measures should be taken in this case."
False Capture is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.