Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Boeing 757 Winglet Programme

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Boeing 757 Winglet Programme

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th May 2004, 17:58
  #21 (permalink)  

Rebel PPRuNer
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Toronto, Canada (formerly EICK)
Age: 51
Posts: 2,834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
747Focal

Most of the references I can find to original work was for MDD (okay now Boeing but for DC/MD not 707) and no sign of this Airbus chicanery you imply.

Sources please?
MarkD is offline  
Old 27th May 2004, 18:15
  #22 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,179
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
747FOCAL,

You are correct to say that Airbus did not design the A320 wing.

You are incorrect to say Boeing had any part in the A320 wing, that was done under the guidance of Mr Back and Mr Wedderspoon at BAe Weybridge, they did use some stuff from the Royal Aircraft Establishment....but no GDY involvement was required.

BAe Weybridge has being doing wing design for airbus going back to the A300.

swh is offline  
Old 28th May 2004, 14:42
  #23 (permalink)  

mostly harmless
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: axis of chocolate
Posts: 189
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a question:

World of Tweed wrote:
Big winglets on a short hauler are a sign of an inefficient wing to begin with!!
Does this imply that the 737NG has an inefficient wing? And if so, given that the wing was re-designed, why?
answer=42 is offline  
Old 28th May 2004, 16:56
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There are a few undesirable characteristics of the 73 NG's wing (principaly being prone to icing and hoar frosts after cold soaking), but inefficiency certainly isn't one of them.

The leap in performance between a 300 and a 700 with identical thrust ratings is huge, the fuel savings are significant, the cruise speed is much improved and the TO/app speeds are about 10kt lower.
Whippersnapper is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.