Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Heathrow: Man Held Over 'Ammunition'

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Heathrow: Man Held Over 'Ammunition'

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jan 2004, 06:44
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Fantasy Island
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Come on Wino, Donkey Duke et al, we're desperate to know how a waddling twenty-stone cowboy wannabe would have solved this one......
BahrainLad is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2004, 08:17
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Who gives a ***** if he had a couple of rounds? So long as he (or an accomplice) didn't have a means of effective discharge. (Yes, yes, I know I'm exhibiting laid back characteristics not befitting one of my years & experience but WTF!)

Re "Don't lock your baggage" Totally agree with most comments. Absolute bollocks! I like my baggage LOCKED. If security wish to open it then they are more than welcome to do so - in MY presence.

And thats on just two beers!!
Basil is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2004, 13:39
  #23 (permalink)  
Final 3 Greens
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Before we get too carried away, although it is understandable given some of the pontification from certain people, has anyone considered if he could have recevied the ammunition from a third party when airside at Heathrow and then got caught in a transit check?
 
Old 15th Jan 2004, 14:49
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,078
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Yo all you pompous limeys, read about your far superior security here.
The US has long way to go and could likely learn from something your lot but I wouldn't hold your model up as some great achievement.

Must be a misunderstanding, that can't happen with UK airport security security on duty.


impossible

Oh drat, not again

still pompous?

just a few days ago

tell me again about the far superior security you have

got some work to do?

A five second search on yahoo yielded all of these plus plenty more

What the heck, as long as your reading, check this one out also.

no one is immune
West Coast is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2004, 14:55
  #25 (permalink)  
Ohcirrej
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: This is the internet FFS.........
Posts: 2,921
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's very good West Coast.

Not all of us are Limeys!

And if you re-read all the posts, aside from one, there is no-body suggesting that UK security procedures should be adopted by one and all. The reaction is a simple one..........given what has been happening over the past couple of weeks reference security in the US. And listing incidents certainly equates the the school yard bully whining "Oh Miss, Miss..........he did it too!! Look!"

WTF do you guys always have to turn it into a competition?
Jerricho is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2004, 15:08
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Abroad
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Please,Let's not all jump on the "I told you so " bandwagon. It's not going to help us as crewmembers. We all want better security both on the ground and in the air. Lets face it, the Americans are on a very steep learning curve with all this. Can we not cut them some slack? Winding each other up in NOT goiung to help our cause. Why not direct some anger to the real culprits in all of this- the terrorists that directly changed our way of travelling life as we know it?
maxy101 is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2004, 15:27
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Excuse my lack on knowledge of guns but the thought has crossed my mind....

I know the sky marshals are going to use low velocity bullets that "damage people but not planes" rather than 'normal' ammunition, but could someone take potent ammunition on the aircraft, find the sky marshal get his gun and use ammunition which could cause problems?
Cejkovice is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2004, 15:40
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What if the gun to fire the rounds was to be placed on board ahead of time by cleaners, catering etc.
Quite possible.
But it would be just as easy to place a loaded gun their also.
But I cannot imagine any mistake or excuse for him to have live rounds on his person.
Earl is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2004, 15:57
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mike J,

BBC news last night suggested it was different types of ammunition. Maybe you're onto something here!!
Civil Servant is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2004, 16:34
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: London, UK
Posts: 391
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
This is extremely bad news, because they will use it as an excuse to justify ever more paranoid and irrational behaviour.
SLF3 is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2004, 16:43
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Notts & Derbyshire border
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What a mockery.
It will be interesting to hear what the bearded one has to say about all of this.!
BRISTOLRE is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2004, 16:47
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Now back in London
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When he comes up before the beak, what are the chances that his defence will be "I saw them fall out of a skymarshall's pocket on the plane. I picked them up to give them back but the man rushed away saying he had another plane to catch."

cur
curmudgeon is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2004, 17:08
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Southern England
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With the proviso that in this case no amount of crew checking would have picked this up, it just highlights the fact that we must ALL be on our guard ALL of the time.
Still very worrying times
Sorry to sound alarmist but remember the terrorist's credo, "We (the terrorist's) only have to get lucky once, You (the targets) have to be lucky all of the time".

Let's be careful out there!
doggonetired is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2004, 17:30
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: 03 ACE
Age: 73
Posts: 1,016
Received 34 Likes on 23 Posts
Personally speaking, I dunno what all the fuss is about.

The rounds were probably a free gift which fell out of his copy of Guns n' Ammo which he bought airside.

No doubt he was taking them home to his kids as a souvenir from the USA.

Poor fellow !!!


El Grifo is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2004, 18:26
  #35 (permalink)  

FX Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Greenwich
Age: 67
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm interested in the comments about Sanford near the beginning of this thread.

One of my colleague's mates has just been found dead of a drug overdose. He was 42 and it turned out he was a secret heroin addict.

He had travelled to Florida (Miami) on business and had returned some 12 hours before he was found dead -- sadly by his son.

The police were called. They searched his suitcase from the trip which was still packed.

In the case they found 10 stun guns (more like zappers actually) and two flick knives.

Maybe Florida has a problem with their security folks. This is not anti-U.S. rhetoric, but apparently the police were horrified when they found the weapons and were going to try and find out why this bloke had not been caught at the airport.

We may hear more about this.
angels is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2004, 20:45
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 46
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is now well over 2 years since 911. The USA has had plenty time enough to get its airport security in order and get up with the "learning curve". I would suggest with reference to the learning "curve" the USA is still below transistion altitude whilst the "curve" is up at about FL350.
timzsta is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2004, 21:05
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Creepy Crawley
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fish

From TODAY's Washington Post:

Screening Easier for Air Travelers

Well done the TSA
Carpe is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2004, 22:00
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Dublin,Ireland
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

The experience in Sanford was mirrored in LAX for European departures last Thursday. In this instance the crew suitcases were required to be unlocked and left with baggage security screening personnel.
When questioned about the "did you leave this suitcase unattended etc type concerns" cabin crew were told that if they were refusing to have bags security checked Homeland security would be called.
The potential for some potential terrorist to exploit the situation in which bags are constantly left unlocked is surely something which must be of concern.
cools is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2004, 22:13
  #39 (permalink)  
Title? What title?
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: In the dog house
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having sat down and thought about the problems of security at places like Dulles, I can only conclude that it must be a nightmare. As I recall it, at Dulles, departing passengers and arriving passengers are in close proximity to each other in the terminal. The terminal used by Virgin is the big long one a bus ride away from security, joined by an escalator and with free access from, I believe to a smaller terminal used by smaller aircraft . This means for example someone arriving from some little place in the middle of nowhere with 1 plane a day and potentially less of a security consious environment could easily meet someone due to depart somewhere else and pass 'what ever' to them. Taking it further, the 'what ever' could, I guess have come from one side of the US to the other, being handed from bad guy to bad guy and having been through just one sleepy xray machine in hicksville before . . . Well, lets not go there.

What is the answer ?

How about xray machines on each gate ?

How about changing the regime in which departing and arriving passengers can mingle in the terminal?

I bet these would be too expensive, so instead lets bluster about, throwing our weight around hasseling everyone else so the public feels something is being done.
phnuff is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2004, 22:34
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,078
Received 55 Likes on 34 Posts
Jerricho
I don't know where you hail from but its the double standard some of the limeys on this board use that requires me to remind them they are no better. I think one of the links doesn't work and thats a shame becuase its to a breach that took place just this month. It shows Brit security isn't very good. Do you see any of that here, nope its all about the Americans. In my couple of years here I have seen a trend in which the limeys love to shovel it out but have a hard time taking it themselves. Be it politics(start a thread about NI and see) social issues or anything else. I guess its easier to find the worst in others rather than looking to yourself. I wonder if any of these recent Brit breaches even made PPRUNE?
West Coast is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.