Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Another AA rudder problem

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Another AA rudder problem

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th December 2001 | 08:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
Swounger
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: New York, NY USA
Post Another AA rudder problem

This isn't related to what happend on Flt 587 is it?

An American Airlines Airbus jetliner departing Lima, Peru, Wednesday evening experienced severe rudder problems during takeoff, forcing it to return to the airport, CNN learned Friday.

The aircraft, an Airbus A300-600, is the same model aircraft as American Airlines Flight 587, which crashed in New York on November 12, killing all 260 people on the plane and five people on the ground in the Rockaway neighborhood of Queens.

Investigators trying to determine the cause of that crash are looking at whether a structural defect in the Airbus' tail section -- which includes the rudder -- may have been a contributing factor.

In Wednesday's incident in Peru, the pilots reported "fish tailing" soon after takeoff.

An aviation source told CNN the aircraft experienced severe rudder fluctuations. A preliminary NTSB report said the plane landed safely and its flight recorders have been pulled for further investigation.


http://europe.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/ame...ent/index.html
Bubbette is offline  
Old 6th December 2001 | 05:29
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Ft, Lauderdale,FL
Post

The Feds have grounded the jet in LIM.
Raas767 is offline  
Old 6th December 2001 | 05:55
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: dallas,tx,usa
Post

At this early stage it appears to be a yaw damper "over-reaction" rather than anything similar to 587.

I don't blame the crew (hopefully everyone else will understand too) one bit for returning to the airport in light of recent events.
dallas dude is offline  
Old 6th December 2001 | 07:11
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: europe
Post

Strange, no one remembers the 737 rudder problem. then again it is the feds investigating.
schit.furbraen is offline  
Old 6th December 2001 | 19:01
  #5 (permalink)  

ex-Tanker
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
From: Luton Beds UK
Lightbulb

On the other hand, we haven't had a vertical stabilizer fall off a 737 yet...
Few Cloudy is offline  
Old 6th December 2001 | 23:09
  #6 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 229
From: UK
Post

No, just 737s falling of their perches.
beardy is offline  
Old 7th December 2001 | 04:08
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: australia
Question

Can the rudder /damper assy be switched off after onset ??
shocka is offline  
Old 7th December 2001 | 04:41
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: Ft, Lauderdale,FL
Post

I just got an e-mail from my union regarding the AA A300 fleet. Apparantly mechanics in Boston want the entire fleet grounded because they found lose rudder attachment fittings on two jets. It made one of the local papers in Boston.
The plot thickens...
Raas767 is offline  
Old 7th December 2001 | 08:54
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
Post

Plastic tails with lose bolts...what next?
411A is offline  
Old 8th December 2001 | 04:42
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: europe
Post

what next? tail trim screw jacks stripping.
Ooops, already happend.
schit.furbraen is offline  
Old 8th December 2001 | 05:02
  #11 (permalink)  
Glasgow's Gallus Gigolo .... PPRuNeing is like making love to a beautiful woman ... I take hours.
 
Joined: Sep 1998
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: UK
Cool

What's next? We find the problem, we fix it, and we learn from it, just like we've dealt with every problem since 1903. Name calling and "my aeroplane's safer than yours" doesn't contribute a great deal: for the record I'd be thrilled to have either a Boeing or an Airbus on my licence- neither is the perfect aeroplane, but then again the perfect aeroplane wouldn't really need us!
Capt Homesick is offline  
Old 8th December 2001 | 06:32
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Post

Bolts are supposed to be wirelocked so as to prevent them coming loose. Maybe they were loosend? Boston again? More coincidences?
Red 69 is offline  
Old 8th December 2001 | 09:29
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
Post

AA....again. Remember ORD...DC-10? Could it be....poor maintenance...again?
OTOH....AirBus...poorly designed?
Time will tell.
411A is offline  
Old 9th December 2001 | 18:23
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
Post

Well said Capt Homesick. No matter what conspiracy theories are flying around about the taliban loosening bolts, mechanics making mistakes and badly designed aeroplanes; what you said holds true.

The professionals just pick themselves up, analyse what happened and move forward. The rest are like exited little puppy dogs jumping around the heels of their masters making all sorts of wild suggestions whilst not achieveing anything.

I hope they find out why this aircraft crashed, and I hope they put a fix in place so it is very very unlikely to ever happen again.......it's as simple as that!
Bomber Harris is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.