Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

MYT emergency landing at MAN

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

MYT emergency landing at MAN

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Dec 2003, 04:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: cheshire
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MYT emergency landing at MAN

a my travel flight from LBA had to make an emergency landing at MAN today (aircraft a B757 reg G-PIDS ) after passengers heard loude banging from the rear of the aircraft

it landed on runway 24L but came in very shallow as it was 8 ton's over weight the cause of the banging was a baggage strap with a metal buckle on it hanging out of the rear cargo hold

so now because someone did not do a proper walk round check at LBA the company has incured a huge cost of having to divert to MAN have the plane checked out (which is still grounded ) and put passengers on another plane ...... this is something MYT just did not need at all
rampman is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2003, 04:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 2,715
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
...sounds like a very expensive bit of slackness, both by the hold net itself and the person who was supposed to check it was inside the aeroplane!

Once upon a time, I was taught that the baggage nets in the hold should be done up, even if the hold is empty

Last edited by Wycombe; 10th Dec 2003 at 05:59.
Wycombe is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2003, 04:51
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: cheshire
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wycombe
i was tought the same thing as well even if the hold is empyt still net it up with the nets provided .. it only takes a min and save incidents like this

someone needs shooting at LBA
rampman is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2003, 09:49
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: england
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Often the walkround is done with the holds open. The last person to check the doors including holds is the traffic agent doing the pushback.
carlos vandango is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2003, 16:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 2,715
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
carlos.......quite right, I was obviously not implying this should have been a crew member!!
Wycombe is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2003, 17:35
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Sunny Warwickshire
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correct me if I'm wrong (and I'm sure you will), but when I was a humble ATCO cadet, we were taught in the emegency phase of our training that there is no such thing as an overweight landing in a 757, I was led to believe that the aircraft is designed to land at max weight and there is no facility to dump fuel on this aircraft because of that reason!!!!

Maybe one day fam flights will return and I can adk all those questions I can never remember to ask here
radar707 is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2003, 17:45
  #7 (permalink)  

I am a figment of my own imagination
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Sad to hear it, as we all know not a good time for MYT to have incidents or accidents, not that there is ever a good time for those ever. Bad luck, glad that it ended without anybody being hurt.
Paterbrat is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2003, 19:46
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just to clear up a couple of points, Mr Boeing does build his aeroplanes very well but any landing over 89811 kg will require an overweight landing check. And secondly the landing would be completely normal (no shallow app), but a little more care might have been taken on the flare.
Nato 35 is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2003, 20:16
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South West UK
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't G-PIDS the kite that was nicknamed G-Pax In Deep S*** due to going tech more frequently than most?

Glad all on board are ok and as always priase to the crew for their professionalism.

No tabloid banner headlines on this one yet then ...
Trident Tested is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2003, 00:02
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it Mytravel that have just announced a £9 million loss?

And (for any of the Tech Log bods who have made the trip) isn't eight tons a hell of a lot to be overweight by? If anyone can make the appropriate technical explanation I'd appreciate it.

Ta.
davethelimey is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2003, 00:08
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Crawley, Sussex, UK
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
£900M....................................................... ............................
Bob Brown is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2003, 00:21
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Daansaaf
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Both the 757 and 767 can safely land at any weight up to the maximum takeoff weight and that can differ considerably from the declared max landing weights (up to 28t for the 757 and 44t for the 767-300).

At any weight over the declared maximum landing weight, as has been pointed out, an overweight landing check must be completed and due consideration given to landing distance, approach speed vs landing flap speed limits (for the 767-300) and brake temperatures.
shlittlenellie is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2003, 19:36
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good stuff, thanks guys.

Bob: I thought it was £900m, but that just sounded so totally freakish that I put it down to a personal mental hiccup.

The CEO has some sober explaning to do, I suppose.
davethelimey is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.