Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Douglas or Boeing

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Douglas or Boeing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd December 2003 | 23:16
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
From: Skagness on the beach
Douglas or Boeing

Just wondering if it will be the "Boeing 7E7" or the "Douglas 7E7"?

Or more realistically the "Phantom" as it is looking like nobody will ever see it.
747FOCAL is offline  
Old 4th December 2003 | 01:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 1
From: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Smile

Cosidering the recent leadership changes including putting Stonecipher at the helm, looks like the McDonnell Douglas takeover of Boeing is now complete!
Airbubba is offline  
Old 4th December 2003 | 06:26
  #3 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 26
Likes: 3
From: At home
Well how about Lookheed 7E7 with anti-gravity engines developed by The Skunk Works
Early Right is offline  
Old 4th December 2003 | 12:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 11
From: Down south, USA.
Thumbs up

You might call it a Douglas.

But if it is full of physically unworkable composite parts and pieces, it will never endure like other Douglas planes. They would then call it a "throwaway plane", as some of our mechanics call the A-320/319. We pay much higher prices for replacement Airbus parts than for Boeing or Douglas parts. If we pay about near double on the streets for a concert or football ticket, we call it "scalping".

Is this proposed "Boeing" design to be based on very light weight composite parts and a goal of short-term operating cost savings, as some other manufacturers have done (reportedly in Brasil, among other places), or will it be built to endure, as the older Convair, Lockheed, Douglas and Boeing aircraft (along with Bae, the Bac 111, Vickers, certain Airbus products etc...) were designed?


Woops-maybe I "let the cat out of the bag" again.

Last edited by Ignition Override; 5th December 2003 at 14:13.
Ignition Override is offline  
Old 4th December 2003 | 15:06
  #5 (permalink)  

ex-Tanker
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 907
Likes: 0
From: Luton Beds UK
Condit - why?

Is the departure of Condit linked to the 767 Tanker deal and its murky background?
Few Cloudy is offline  
Old 4th December 2003 | 20:24
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Aviation Qualifications: PPL
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 57
From: Surrey, UK ;
Condit's Departure

According to the Today Prog on BBC Radio 4 on Wed 4th, Phil Condit's departure was to "draw a line" beneath the tanker affair .... which is apparently on hold until the DoD carry out further investigations.
Dave Gittins is offline  
Old 5th December 2003 | 02:14
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: USA
Few Cloudy:

It is probably linked to some great extent, to precisely the opposite of a murky background of the tanker buy. It is because the background that appears to be alegedly decidedly shady is out in the bright sunshine taht some one or more must go over the side.

Lets see, the phases of a program are:

wild enthusiasm
abject disillusionment
search for the guilty
punishment of the innicent
praise and honors for the uninvolved

Where is Boeing on this one?
Iron City is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.