![]() |
Cabri G5
|
Yes, just read about this. Huge news for some of us; the G2 has a luxurious-feeling modern cockpit with very efficient use of space and great visibility. The G5 seems to use a similar engine as the 120, but is supposed to be lighter and smaller. (5 seats is the "high-density" configuration, so sounds/looks closer to 66 in size, where 3 seats in back is cramped and 2 is better.) Excited to see how this develops; it's clearly years away from prototype stage but it's great they're working on it.
|
|
I wonder what Jason Hill makes of this
|
Perhaps he can make an engine for them. :}
Hat, coat, exit... |
Originally Posted by hargreaves99
(Post 12050080)
I wonder what Jason Hill makes of this
|
Interesting to see the Marignane connection in the background. Given Bruno’s involvement with the EC120 program back in the 90s, there’s clearly some pedigree behind the project. Let’s hope the MGB lives up to the expectations!
|
Originally Posted by hargreaves99
(Post 12050080)
I wonder what Jason Hill makes of this
|
Originally Posted by hargreaves99
(Post 12050080)
I wonder what Jason Hill makes of this
|
Originally Posted by CGameProgrammerr
(Post 12050055)
Yes, just read about this. Huge news for some of us; the G2 has a luxurious-feeling modern cockpit with very efficient use of space and great visibility. The G5 seems to use a similar engine as the 120, but is supposed to be lighter and smaller. (5 seats is the "high-density" configuration, so sounds/looks closer to 66 in size, where 3 seats in back is cramped and 2 is better.)
The G2 really lends itself well to upscaling as it was already designed as a stepping stone trainer that is supposed to feel like a larger H120-H125. the H120 never lived to its hype, that could be what the H120 never could achieve in overwhole utility: price, range, performance ... |
Originally Posted by [email protected]
(Post 12050269)
Between this and the Robinson unmanned programme, his 'innovation' is looking more and more like yesterday's news.
it does not matter that you started in pole position with a great idea, "HX50 full verticalization of the industry to your design", that idea is too heavy, you will not finish in first place. I paid the price too many time, a great idea does not buy you time, it just buys a chance in the race. |
Originally Posted by Agile
(Post 12050279)
|
Originally Posted by minimo
(Post 12050237)
Interesting to see the Marignane connection in the background. Given Bruno’s involvement with the EC120 program back in the 90s, there’s clearly some pedigree behind the project. Let’s hope the MGB lives up to the expectations!
|
I wonder if Mr. Gelb and company will be looking at this. They fly some G2's for training as well as having been/are a large promoter of the Hill machine.
|
I think this will be certified well before the HC50, even though it's clearly much earlier in development, because it's using off-the-shelf avionics and engine. But the HX50 (experimental) *should* hopefully be flying well before this does.
|
Originally Posted by CGameProgrammerr
(Post 12050573)
I think this will be certified well before the HC50, even though it's clearly much earlier in development, because it's using off-the-shelf avionics and engine. But the HX50 (experimental) *should* hopefully be flying well before this does.
|
It'll do to the R66 what the G2 did to the R22.
|
The G2 didn't really affect the R22 sales/usage in Europe.
Hardly anyone in the UK uses the G2 as it's almost the same price as an R44! And they break all the time |
Originally Posted by Robbiee
(Post 12051698)
It'll do to the R66 what the G2 did to the R22.
|
Originally Posted by DavidSmithHeli
(Post 12051794)
this year we are expecting to deliver at least 40 R22’s. Last year only 20 G2’s were delivered.
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 14:19. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.