![]() |
Auto....Auto......wanna see an AUTO |
QUOTE]Auto....Auto......wanna see an AUTO[/QUOTE]
Er its called ballistic recovery parachute system as fitted to many LSA and larger aircraft. Cirrus C 172 C 150 etc etc. Been around since the 80's and so far used successfully about 250 times. Even works when the wings drop off obviously. You blokes need to get out more often.:O:O |
When viewed full-screen, you can see lots of little wobbles in the pitch and yaw plane - a machine of real size and weight (with the subsequent inertia in pitch and roll) could not wobble that fast without some serious stresses.
|
Check video at 1:24 for weight indication
Originally Posted by mickjoebill
(Post 9748545)
The point he is making is the production model will be a four seater.
Do you agree that what was flown was a full size two seater craft, ie of a size that could fit two adults? Mickjoebill If you know or have access to the actual flight vehicle dimensions, just provide them. It may be capable of fitting two passengers, but it appears smaller than he non flying mockup shown earlier in the video. Regarding the flying aircrafts actual weight. Stop the video at 1:24 and look at the landing gear being used. The three thin curved hoops of either composite or metal could not support a realistic weight of a two passenger aircraft. |
OK, I relooked at the video and a number of questions came to my mind.
1. why did it take off from a taxiway and not from either the runway or a helicopter landing pad? 2. for a first flight why was there no flight data probes? surely you would want to know the environment that the aircraft was flying in? 3. Why did they not list the airport that they took off from, every other first flight video tells you the time and date and where the first flight occurred? Was this flight legal? 4. When it took off it had aGoProo mounted at each wing tip let later on in the video there was one missing, did it loose a GoPro if not was it the second flight that we saw later on in the video? To be honest there are too many questions and not enough data to make those questions disappear. Fats |
Re the previous posts, sensible questions from Ppruners, which have been put to the company on social media.
They have replied directly, saying the video was edited from more than one flight during their test program and the craft was their full size two seater. This conversation raises the question of the definition of a "prototype". Mickjoebill |
Weight and dimensions please
Originally Posted by mickjoebill
(Post 9749154)
Re the previous posts, sensible questions from Ppruners, which have been put to the company on social media.
They have replied directly, saying the video was edited from more than one flight during their test program and the craft was their full size two seater. This conversation raises the question of the definition of a "prototype". Mickjoebill Weight and dimensions please. Then the truth is clear. |
Originally Posted by Ascend Charlie
(Post 9381039)
Then these "Experts" should know that it is far more efficient to accelerate a large amount of air to a low speed, then a small amount of air to a high speed, as well as the noise. Compare the noise and downwash disturbance from a 5-ton helicopter (S-76) in the hover to a Harrier jet.
Yeah, the noise may be different. |
Originally Posted by PDR1
(Post 9748649)
... show me the paperwork that would be needed to test fly that under remote piloting (because that's not a trivial thing in an EASA country). Then perhaps I might be less sceptical.
PDR ESA website |
Originally Posted by Nige321
(Post 9749373)
ESA are involved. I doubt they'd put up with fake videos.
ESA website It goes on to say that Lilium is now developing its first product, a two seater ultra light... I think that settles the matter, the video is of one of the prototypes. |
A Manager at Lilium HQ have said it was their full scale 2 seater used on the maiden flight video and that the video contains pictures from multiple flights.
You could estimate the craft dimensions from the drone shot with the tech laying underneath. I'll ask about weight but don't hold your breath:) One assumes their plan for world domination has factored in the prospect of evolving battery efficiencies. Pity they didn't show an unedited flight from takeoff to landing. I've suggested they release an unedited shot from the camera drone that was also airborne. Mickjoebill |
Originally Posted by Ascend Charlie
(Post 9748658)
When viewed full-screen, you can see lots of little wobbles in the pitch and yaw plane - a machine of real size and weight (with the subsequent inertia in pitch and roll) could not wobble that fast without some serious stresses.
|
Thanks Mick
Thanks Mick,
I agree. I won't hold my breath waiting for an aircraft weight. |
video of a vehicle that clearly does not conform to a production configuration Similarly, the flying bedstead wasn't a production model Harrier. |
PDR,
It was, apparently real person with a real job title in marketing who responded to me by email. So both head of marketing and the co-founder are saying the same thing, that the video was of their full size 2 seater. Mickjoebill |
The flight took place at the Grob Airfield im Mindelheim.
Jo |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 23:17. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.