Eurocopter or Bell?
 

Just completed my PPL(H) in R22 - yippy.

However I now live in Switzerland and want to convert my licence to fly something a bit bigger.

The nearest flying club is in Zurich and they have 2 types of helicopters:-
BELL JET RANGER 206B
EUROCOPTER EC120B "COLIBRI"

There is about a 80 quid price difference per hour - so is the Eurocopter worth the extra cash - it definately looks nicer :)

Hi
 

I advise make your decision based on insurance requirements... With no CPL you may not be able to fly one or either on low hours... Here in UK the EC120 is usually more restrictive... Normally on the 206 you need to gain 25hrs p1 before you can fly it on your own.... so you dont fry the engine..either on start or in flight. The Ec120 may be more restrictive...?
Please do let us know what you find out.

Oh Poo, thought I could do 5 hours training then take one up by myself - but I suppose turbine engines are a whole world of difference. Don't think my pay packet would stretch to 25hrs - 5 was going to break my bank as it is.

There doesn't seem to be many R22's or R44's around the place and my previous flying instructor (from military background) said they might be a bit low on power for all those mountains.

Will speak to the club and find out what needs to be done - thanks.

Don't worry about the mountains. You are not allowed to land above 1100m in Switzerland without a mountain license and then only on the official 42 landing sites. Therefore the R44 would be good enough.

R22
 

Poo indeed..
Yes and I would seriously make your next investment into mountain training. There's a lot going on... icing.. updraughts/downdraughts, cloud formation... turbulence.. escape routes.... cloud below.. vortex ring in 'level flight' in updraughts.... even strong updraughts catching out a lightweight guy low on fuel could conceivably push him up into cloud.
Always have an autorotatable escape route, 180 degree turning space and stay above 30 knots IAS.... All pinnacle approaches... abandon them unless lever is low, decent rate is low and you are into wind.
With proper training even the R22 is very capable. I did my mountain training in an R22 in New Zealand, e.g landing at 7700ft DA in snow. They sling venison at 5000ft+ there in the Robbie! It's not all about power.. as much as knowledge..... :8

k48

you need to get a decent insurance company then i know of private pilots in our gazelle share scheme that are training for their licences on gazelles they are abitio pilots they go through their training solo or dual the same as other pilots it involved us in a extra cost of £15 per hour on our existing insurance

steve

Md 600
 

Hi Steve,
Say again..... can you give any more detail on that gazelle program/costs? How much to buy in and do you have any idea on how much a month in expenses and hourly contributions etc....

Chris

Gazelle share scheme
 

Well that made my ears prick up...
As K48, interested to hear more about this...
TIA JFDI

you asked for this i hope its not seen as advertising this is for info only
1
initial payment
depends on helicopter but in all cases 6 shares I share being retained so only 5 are for sale at the outset
price guide
UK military 35k
N reg 341 42k
341g 50k
342 60k
342 65k


2
monthly fees to management company to include annual fees[authority costs]/hangarage/and insurance
£275 per month vat not yet but maybe required in future but if company owners buy shares it may be an advantage to charge vat ??

3
hourly fees to owners fund for maintenance and parts
to start at 200 per hour dry initially but may change in future depends on bills but this should cover it
this is a ring fenced fund nothing to do with management company

4
use of other aircraft it is envisaged that any owner will be able to use the other syndicates aircraft if their aircraft is not available for the hourly rate plus £30 to management company for expenses £230.

'For info only'? Er, surely that's the very definition of advertising? :ugh:

If you were concerned about the 'no advertising' rules, wouldn't PMs be better? :hmm:

B73,

Since there appears to be no reference or link to whoever the syndicate is, I have no problem with the information posted ;)

I'm sure that anyone wanting to take it further will be able to PM md 600 driver if they want further information :ok:

Senior Pilot

I think my original post has been hijacked :}

Can anyone tell me if there is any really difference in the 2 helicopters and which would be more fun to fly?
BELL JET RANGER 206B
EUROCOPTER EC120B "COLIBRI"

Thanks

206 or 120?
 

Well, I for one started with the basic opinion that the 206 is an old and dull helicopter. I changed my mind after about 25 hours on type. I only have a test ride in the EC120 but a type rating is on the horizon.

I guess there are a great number of 206's out there and it is definately a solid work-horse with a very good track record. From what I gather, it will give you about the same performance as the EC120, and for being from about 1964, it's a good looking helicopter - sort of the basic incarnation of the term helicopter itself.

I would spend my money on the Bell for the simple reason that it is cheaper, well established on the market, very reliable and always available.

Teetering rotors may have their disadvantages, but if you stay away from the dangerous conditions it can still be pretty fun to fly!

Greetings from up north,

/p

Since flying is a lot about feeling it is hard to describe.
You have to find out for yourself.
I have flown both types, 650+ to 200+ hours in favour of the Bell, and I like the 206 more, especially the Longranger.
Did anyone notice the different smell?