PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   AS350 Astar/Squirrel (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/229370-as350-astar-squirrel.html)

Heliringer 16th January 2011 06:49

AS350 nut.

I think you would just engage the Pitch and Roll buttons and this is your SAS.
This will keep the Cyclic in the position you set when you pressed the buttons and you can override it by pushing the button normally located on the cyclic to adjust.

I will say this is from a long time ago so I could be very wrong!

[email protected] 16th January 2011 15:00

AS350 Genertor
 
as350nut regarding starting:

Without going into the K1-K4 relay Z1 PCB card sequencing in the master electrical box, the generator will automatically engage once the generator voltage exceeds the distribution bus voltage by 0.5v. This will occur once the generator switch is engaged and there is no external power (i.e. aircraft battery start). With the start button depressed beyond 40-45% NG you will inhibit the generator from coming online. This is actually a required maintenance check for start inhibition (maintenance inspections related not normal procedures) and a successful check is noted by illumination of the CAP Generator light. It also prevents a few other items from occurring too like igniters. The Generator function itself is therefore a matter of voltage difference rather than NG percentage although they correlate.

Hope that helps.

RVDT 16th January 2011 17:28


This is actually a required maintenance check for start inhibition (maintenance inspections related not normal procedures) and a successful check is noted by illumination of the CAP Generator light. It also prevents a few other items from occurring too like igniters.
And if it it flames out you have a "re-injection" problem! :D

as350nut 17th January 2011 06:40

bhl@
Heliringer
Thanks for the reply, appreciated;) I get the aircraft in 4 weeks can hardly wait.

victor papa 17th January 2011 07:09

In the starting solenoied valve of the Arriel 1 is the "start inhibitor" switch. At 45% N1 round about pending atmospheric conditions, the centrifugal compressor air pressure closes the switch thus inhibiting the starting cycle and bleed the injectors. Due to this action the generator will come online if selected on once it's voltage is o.5V above the batteries/ground power.

When you do the maintenance check referred to, you are actually checking the working of the switch in the starting solenoid valve.

Hope it helps and enjoy your 350!

Ian Corrigible 6th April 2011 13:51

X2 first flight (no, not *that* X2...)
 

Eurocopter Flies Secret X2 Helo, a Ecureuil Replacement
AIN April 5, 2011

Last month in Marignane, France, Eurocopter quietly flew the first prototype of a helicopter that is to replace the EC130 light single and possibly the entire Ecureuil family, Jean-Michel Billig, the company's executive vice president for research and development, told AIN yesterday.

The program is codenamed X2, although it has no relationship with Sikorsky's technology demonstrator of the same name. Certification is planned for 2013.

The aircraft will feature a new avionics suite, internally known as Cigalhe, that will introduce four-axis autopilots to light helicopters. Cigalhe is essentially an integrated, modular architecture. It will be first certified on the EC175 medium twin next year. Following will be the EC135, the EC145T2, the (Eurocopter) X2 and then the X4 Dauphin replacement, Billig said. For the pilot, AIN understands a notable innovation on Cigalhe will be in symbology. The entry-level EC120 will not be fitted with the new avionics, which would have been too heavy for the type, according to Billig.
......
I/C

Savoia 6th April 2011 14:36

.
IC: Immensely interesting. The Ecureuil has been such a hugely successful helicopter (and quite rightly so too!).

It will indeed be interesting to see whether EC can repeat their triumph with a successor - if indeed this is the intention behind the X2.

By the way, I completely forgot to express my appreciation for your comprehensive brief on the AS350B3e as showcased at Heliexpo and which I found most interesting. Thank you.

Best

Sav

Big Foot 12th June 2011 07:08

AS 350 B Model
 
What is the opinion of the AS 350 B model, good, bad or otherwise ?
Why the lower MTOW than the BA when they have the same engine ?
Im guessing the different blades make a difference to performance as well.

Cheers
BF

Phoinix 12th June 2011 08:52

BA has a wider blade chord (from 355 model) which makes a lot of performance difference.

Big Foot 13th June 2011 06:34

So could you put 355 blades on a B model and get an uprated MTOW like a BA ?

Phoinix 13th June 2011 06:55

Sure. While you are at it, add a PT6 twin pack to it and fly at 11200 lbs MTOM. :E

Big Foot 13th June 2011 07:31

Ill take that as a no then.

RVDT 13th June 2011 07:54


So could you put 355 blades on a B model and get an uprated MTOW like a BA?
To do that it would have to be a BA. You can do this mod via SB 01-35.

Then if you have loads of cash you can go from BA to B2 with SB 01-50.

If the aircraft is eligible of course with respect to modification and previous SB status. It may not be economic if you have an old MR Mast etc. etc. etc...........

You may be able to do the B to BA in the field but I think the BA to B2 may only be authorised for EC.

"Call your friendly EC dealer/distributor" here :bored:

Ian Corrigible 23rd June 2011 21:17

Eurocopter holds event to celebrate AS350 family, incl. 5,000th delivery

Some neat materials on the event website, incl. family history and evolution (/natural selection :E).

https://scontent-b-mia.xx.fbcdn.net/..._4747851_n.jpg

I/C

Big Foot 10th July 2011 02:47

AS 350 FX2. A pilots perspective
 
I am interested as to how this conversion performs as apposed to a B2 or SD2 i am aware the engine is the same as the SD2 but is there any difference it what it can do with the other mods on it.

The work is lifting work in reasonably high density altitudes.
I have flowen both other types on simarlar work and would be interested to know if the FX2 can give you any more than the others.

Vertical Freedom 10th July 2011 13:46

Just go for a B3e & do it with ease :)

Big Foot 11th July 2011 03:21

To B3 or not to B3
 
Well that has been suggested, have been told the FX 2 is a B2 and half or is that rubbish ?
Anyone care to comment ?

Arrrj 11th July 2011 07:44

BF

Both NPWS (NSW @ YSBK) and Heliaust (YSBK) have all sorts of AS350's. FX2's included. They are friendly guys, give them a call and ask for their opinion directly.

I know the FX2 is a machine that they all like to fly, and of course, the B3 is the go !

Arrrj :ok:

FauxZ 12th July 2011 01:15

I haven't been in a B3, but we have a couple of FX2's as well as a Soloy. The FX is certainly my favorite. We've been working at sea level, but the temps have been as high as 100F and 80% humidity and it'll still lift 1800lbs off the ground with 50% fuel. Slowly, but it does it. This is at 93% TQ, just touching the yellow on T4.

I think the main advantage of the FX2 is the maintenance. It's very simple, not nearly as many electronics to fiddle with or worry about. We went 600 hours without any major issues at all, and not a single electrical issue.

Vertical Freedom 13th July 2011 04:51

Check out the performance in the RFM of the B3+ @ 1,257kg empty weight & see how she does. Amazing HOGE, fuel burn above 12,000' is back to 30% per hour but MCP @ sea level can suck 225 lph giving an indicated 130k but more likely 135/140k.. Nothing goes like she does except a Lama. :D


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:11.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.