Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

AS350 Astar/Squirrel

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

AS350 Astar/Squirrel

Reply

Old 5th Apr 2001, 12:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Heliport
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Lightbulb AS350 Astar/Squirrel

LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
PRESS RELEASE

"LAPD Grounds Eurocopters Temporarily"

Los Angeles - On Saturday, March 17, 2001, the East Bay Regional Park Police experienced a complete engine failure in one of its Eurocopter AS350B-2 helicopters while it was being operated on patrol over San Leandro. The pilot landed safely and the crew sustained no injuries. The aircraft sustained minor damage.

Because the Los Angeles Police Department operates eight of the same model helicopters, it began a study of the East Bay Regional Park Police (EBRPP) incident to discover the facts associated with that incident. Following examination of the helicopter and discussions with key personnel, helicopter maintenance representatives, Eurocopter Corporation and Turbomeca, LAPD has temporarily grounded its AS350B-2 helicopter fleet pending further investigation. The Department continues to work closely with Eurocopter Corporation, Turbomeca and appropriate federal authorities in an effort to determine the cause of the EBRPP incident and ensure that LAPD aircraft are properly equipped for return to service.

It is expected the AS350B-2 helicopters will be returned to service during the next six weeks.

sf
 
Reply With Quote
Old 5th Apr 2001, 12:51
  #2 (permalink)  
Thomas coupling
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Red face

No-one is going to convince me that one engine is as good as two for emergency service work. That would have been good for the industry if that happened over London or any other city here in the UK....

------------------
Thermal runaway.
 
Reply With Quote
Old 5th Apr 2001, 21:07
  #3 (permalink)  
Hoverman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I can't comment on the emergency services, but why good for "the industry"?

Do that stats support the theory that singles are, in practice, safer than twins
Aren't most heli accidents in the UK weather related - very rarely power failure?
 
Reply With Quote
Old 5th Apr 2001, 21:19
  #4 (permalink)  
Deeko01
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

I have to say having been a helicopter crewman, If you were to put me in a AS350 with an Arriel engine or an AS355 with Allison engines over water for 100 miles then I would chose the AS350 any day.

The feeling of the Twin Squirrel or TwinStar to US was that if you got an engine failure then the other engine took you to the scene of the crash.

My personal belief is with regard to the CAA's view on single engine helo ops near cities that it is not what the US can do it is what we cant do, the statistics prove I am right.

CAA = Jobs for the boys.

------------------
Better to be up there wishing you were down here than be down here wishing you were up there!
 
Reply With Quote
Old 5th Apr 2001, 23:30
  #5 (permalink)  
HeliEng
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs up

An opinion I heard once, was a Twin is O.K. But having two engines, makes you twice as likely to have engine failure!

Don't know quite how that works statistically!

"Some days you are the pigeon, some days you are the statue"
 
Reply With Quote
Old 6th Apr 2001, 00:47
  #6 (permalink)  
hoverbover
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking

I was doing a conversion course in the states, and asked the factory instructor/test pilot (as we were practicing engine offs in a single at the time) How many engine failures he had experienced in his time (20 years in various mil roles I think)And he said just two,to this I asked wether it was a single or a twin, the reply:
"Oh it was a twin and both quit, an Apache actually !!!!!!" Apparantly it was quite exciting.

So maybe only Merlins/Eh 101(or anything with threeengines) should be allowed for EMS(joke).

The one thing you can be sure of,if its got an(y) engines they will stop! It may be at your request or it may not!

Regards
hoverbover
 
Reply With Quote
Old 6th Apr 2001, 02:16
  #7 (permalink)  
army427
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

The organisation that I work for use a medium twin on 24 hour SPIFR SAR/EMS tasks. When the twin is unavailable we use an AS350. Although I do feel safer flying with two engines, my main concern is that the single is not equipped for the tasks we perform. Small cabin area, VFR, no autopilot etc.

Single engine VFR helicopters certainly have their place in a variety of roles but when it comes to emergency services work, particularly at night, they have limitations. Combine that with operations over urban areas at night and I feel that a twin is essential.

Most of our pasengers (patients) have little choice over which type of helicopter they are flown in. I think that they deserve the more capable twin.
 
Reply With Quote
Old 13th Jun 2001, 05:53
  #8 (permalink)  
widgeon
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking AS 350 Astar / Squirrel

Am I crazy or was there an AS350C model , B is Turbomeca D is Lycoming, textron, allied signal / honeywell ( GE ? ). I recall seeing on the transport Canada site an early serial number (1004)C-GMEY that was converted from C to D and then to B.
 
Reply With Quote
Old 13th Jun 2001, 07:16
  #9 (permalink)  
rotormatic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

The AS-350-C was an astar powered by an early model lycoming engine, a LTS-101-600A
 
Reply With Quote
Old 1st Jul 2001, 05:16
  #10 (permalink)  
Pac Rotors
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post AS-350B-3 Question

Hey All

Just had a question re the B3. Have been here with one in Alaska and it proved itself to be a very capable machine. We lifted a hut up on one of the glaciers and did it very nicely.


Was wondering what other pilots or mechanics thought of re this machine. Good and bad points.
 
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd Jul 2001, 21:43
  #11 (permalink)  
Intersection
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Post

If your talking about the squirrel then yes they are a very good a/c and the RAF use them as a basic trainer are you talking about the twin or single both are good and i assume the twin would be able lift pretty large underslung loads. As the single does with relative ease they are comarible i beleive with the 206.

------------------
"Vacate next Left at intersection...., contact ground on 121.9"
 
Reply With Quote
Old 4th Sep 2001, 08:10
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: California
Posts: 11
Lightbulb AS 350 Astar / Squirrel

After the terrible reputation these aircraft (engines)obtained in the 1980s does anyone know how the engine is holding up now on the remaining AS-350Ds out there ?....At one time they were called "EXPLODING STARS"

There are a few operated in Southern California that ive seen lately and its made me wonder.

From what i heard the problems are a thing of the past and considering the LTS-101s are about 1/3 the cost to overhaul and burn less fuel than the turbomecca they are now worth considering. Ive even been told some people are reconverting Turbomecca REengined AS-350Ds back to the LTS-101.

ANY COMMENTS ?

[ 04 September 2001: Message edited by: Larry ]
Larry is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th Sep 2001, 16:23
  #13 (permalink)  
CTD
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 94
Post

The older LTS-101 engines were indeed troublesome and were terribly unreliable, but the later versions (A-3) shouldn't be saddled with the same reputation.

Nowadays, things have changed and the engine has become all the things you say in your post. I haven't flown one in 6 years, but I have friends who operate D's and B's together and find the D to be a much better ship. Easy on gas, easy to start, more reliable and MUCH lower DOCs. The company you speak of is now marketing a 'Super D' using BA components with the LTS powerplant, and by all accounts it's a great ship.
CTD is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th Sep 2001, 22:20
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: California
Posts: 82
Post

I'd agree, the LTS 101 is now a superb engine. Great power margins, inexpensive etc.

SSShhhhhh, don't let it get out or the prices will go up.
tgrendl is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th Sep 2001, 02:31
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: small town NZ
Posts: 29
Post

I work for a company that has a lot of D's and a Super D. Seem to be pretty good with the updated 101, having said that I had an early 101 distroy itself on the side of a hill, not a good feeling.

The super D pisses all over the BA and would fly it any day. All our landings are around 8000 feet and we have no troulbe with 7 pob and good fuel.

That's my 2 cents worth - hope it helps.
BigJim is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th Sep 2001, 04:22
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: ...in view of the 'Southern Cross' ...
Posts: 1,379
Post

LTS101 engine of today is a very different engine to the engine of the early eighties...lots of development taken place with turbine wheels, burner cans and such like ...it is now a very good engine and as indicated in a previous post...having said all that I only operate the engine in the BK117 not the AS350!
spinwing is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 8th Sep 2001, 08:42
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Wa
Posts: 4
Question

Does anyone know what the real costs are to convert an AS350BA to the new LTS101 power?
RotorMod is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 8th Sep 2001, 09:17
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: states
Age: 63
Posts: 134
Post

Here is an example of the improved Honeywell engine....
http://av-info.faa.gov/ad/PublishedADs/011715.html

The fuel pump needs to be pulled every 600 hours, and sent to CECO for inspection...not field maintainable.....
rotormatic is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd Dec 2001, 19:02
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada/around
Posts: 148
Post AS 350 Astar

AS 350 servo transparency

If anyone knows where to find accident write-ups and analyses related to this I would really appreciate finding out where they are.
HeloTeacher is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd Dec 2001, 21:12
  #20 (permalink)  

Iconoclast
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The home of Dudley Dooright-Where the lead dog is the only one that gets a change of scenery.
Posts: 2,132
Question

To: Helo Teacher

The way this condition has been described to me it is the jamming or loss of servo boost under certain maneuvering conditions. For the life of me I don’t know where the term transparency came from to describe this condition but then again maybe someone else can.

To me it is a design defect in the hydraulic system that should be corrected by Aerospatial because under certain emergent conditions if the “transparency” manifests itself the helicopter could crash but then again that is what you are looking for.
Lu Zuckerman is offline  
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service