Very weird 206 crash video Langley BC 20 May 2021
Is this some crazy visual illusion, or is that thing spinning clockwise? The video doesn't appear to be reversed or mirrored, the tail rotor is on the correct side, the leading edges seem to point counter clockwise as they should. Any theories what is going on here? Media says this happened "after undergoing maintenance". |
Camera frame rate, a tutorial.
|
hello,
it is impossible to start a turbine in the wrong direction even if it would be possible the free whelling unit behind wont drive your gearbox. The picture fom highrpm shows the debris from the impact spreading away in the correct direction. So this is just an ilusion. |
Take off like a brute, and instantly overpitch it. Great job!
|
If that was 'post-maintenance' then don't let them service your helicopter...........
|
Originally Posted by MichiScholz
(Post 11049542)
hello,
it is impossible to start a turbine in the wrong direction even if it would be possible the free whelling unit behind wont drive your gearbox. The picture fom highrpm shows the debris from the impact spreading away in the correct direction. So this is just an ilusion. |
Check weight and balance hover? Fire extinguisher in proximity? Well done the guy under the 500, quick thinking and abnegation of his own security to go and help. Respect.
|
Take Off to Landing...constitutes one flight.
How does the guy log the time for this one? If he cannot log any flight time....does it count as an Accident or Incident?:ouch: |
Originally Posted by SASless
(Post 11049683)
Take Off to Landing...constitutes one flight.
How does the guy log the time for this one? If he cannot log any flight time....does it count as an Accident or Incident?:ouch: |
To be fair, he did walk away from it so does it count as a good landing?
|
According to the owner of the helicopter, I suspect not.
|
PIC assumes a pilot, looks more like a couple of kids that learned on an iPad sim app.
Someone with sharper eyes than mine may be able to pick up more detail. Registration isn’t current. https://cimg4.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....f262f3610.jpeg https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/pprune....4b09ca088.jpeg |
How about attaching the tail rotor blades the wrong way around. The would cause them to go into overpitch which would overcome the pilot.
Not new. The first Puma that came out of centralised service at Odiham came out with the main rotor blades mounted the same as the Wessex. I know because I was going to do the air test.. |
I have seen an Alouette III that flew fine with the Tail Rotor Blades on in reverse.....would have been signed off after the Air Test until a sharp eyed individual noted that minor discrepancy
Mr. Murphy must have immigrated to France where he took up Helicopter Design Engineering. For the record I was engaged in winning a round of Uckers while that was happening. |
Originally Posted by highrpm
(Post 11049522)
Looks very clockwise to me, and looks like the trailing edge is leading the leading edge.
|
I think that screenshot solves it. The transmission is moving to the right, as it should with the blade at the top of the frame having just hit the ground in the normal counterclockwise direction. Well then, maybe someone just rolled it up to 100% with the collective halfway up or something.
|
Almost looks like something had snagged the front of the skid and tripped it.
|
Is there a good reason for helicopters to shift to forward flight immediately on takeoff rather than to ascend vertically for a few hundred feet before heading out?
Iirc, some recent accidents might have been avoided that way. |
Originally Posted by etudiant
(Post 11050011)
Is there a good reason for helicopters to shift to forward flight immediately on takeoff rather than to ascend vertically for a few hundred feet before heading out?
Iirc, some recent accidents might have been avoided that way. |
Originally Posted by etudiant
(Post 11050011)
Is there a good reason for helicopters to shift to forward flight immediately on takeoff rather than to ascend vertically for a few hundred feet before heading out?
Iirc, some recent accidents might have been avoided that way. |
Originally Posted by Ascend Charlie
(Post 11050032)
Ummm... yes... it needs a heck of a lot more power to climb vertically, and it puts you into the Avoid area of the Height/Velocity curve.
|
Not just "more expensive", because in many cases, the aircraft has power for an In Ground Effect (IGE) hover and transition to forward flight, but not enough for Out of Ground Effect.(OGE) or OMG.
|
It would count as a flight “from the moment the rotors start to move for the purpose of flight to the moment they stop”
Took off with HYD deselected? From my memory, apart from the position of the switch that isn’t 8n your immediate sight line, there is no other indication that HYD is selected or not until you lift into the hover and realise you need more effort than you expected with the resultant over controlling. Only a guess. |
Originally Posted by Akrapovic
(Post 11049689)
Logging it as P i/c would be a bit cheeky. . .
|
If the HYD was off, the pilot would feel the feedback in the cyclic and the hugely increased effort in raising the collective - I doubt that anybody with a milligram of brains could try to yank it into the air without realising that the hydraulics were off.
|
Originally Posted by SASless
(Post 11049683)
Take Off to Landing...constitutes one flight.
How does the guy log the time for this one? If he cannot log any flight time....does it count as an Accident or Incident?:ouch: |
Ascend, you are assuming everyone has common sense there ( if sense was common then everyone would have it ) I have seen quite recently a pilot get in a 206 on my home airfield and start his 206 up with the rear tie down still done up ! So I wouldn't put it past anyone to take off with hydraulics off
|
I'm going to cut the guy some slack on the basis that no qualified pilot could accidently wreck a serviceable helicopter in the way we saw that helicopter wrecked in that video. There must have been something seriously whacky with that helicopter which was outside the competency of any pilot to do something to change the outcome. For the life of me I can't think what that might be, other than the passenger yanked on the flight controls unexpectedly.
|
Media reported:"after undergoing maintenance", in an earlier post. One would think that the ground run part would include trying small control movements and looking for the correct rotor response ( assume one can move the pedals on this model before starting the engine and confirming that control input is free and properly phased. Then, before getting energetic about getting up and away, lift it to just skids beginning to break ground and again, small control inputs, after which a very slow lift to a low hover and repeat the control inputs etc. Not what the video shows, but then again, perhaps something went amiss as they were just slowly lifting and the result was beyond their ability to perform any corrective action. Test flights following maintenance have to be treated very carefully.
|
Originally Posted by Hughes500
(Post 11050374)
Ascend, you are assuming everyone has common sense there ( if sense was common then everyone would have it ) I have seen quite recently a pilot get in a 206 on my home airfield and start his 206 up with the rear tie down still done up ! So I wouldn't put it past anyone to take off with hydraulics off
I personally partially blame mobile phones for a lot of it, too distracting. |
"Passenger?" Hmm.
|
Originally Posted by lelebebbel
(Post 11049501)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTyJV8czKBU
Is this some crazy visual illusion, or is that thing spinning clockwise? The video doesn't appear to be reversed or mirrored, the tail rotor is on the correct side, the leading edges seem to point counter clockwise as they should. Any theories what is going on here? Media says this happened "after undergoing maintenance". |
Originally Posted by krypton_john
(Post 11050888)
Was Hogg at the controls again?
|
Was this Heli fitted with Duels - if so had 'co pilot' - pax anything to do with what happened ? Big bag on knee etc.
Maybe that's where the reason lies. |
Was this Heli fitted with Duels |
"Guns or knives, Butch?"
|
Never bring a knife to a gun fight:)
|
Originally Posted by JohnDixson
(Post 11050537)
Media reported:"after undergoing maintenance", in an earlier post. One would think that the ground run part would include trying small control movements and looking for the correct rotor response ( assume one can move the pedals on this model before starting the engine and confirming that control input is free and properly phased. Then, before getting energetic about getting up and away, lift it to just skids beginning to break ground and again, small control inputs, after which a very slow lift to a low hover and repeat the control inputs etc. Not what the video shows, but then again, perhaps something went amiss as they were just slowly lifting and the result was beyond their ability to perform any corrective action. Test flights following maintenance have to be treated very carefully.
reflight! Preflight! Preflight!. If it's coming out of maintenance review the record and talk to those who did the work. Part of the (my?) cockpit set up prestart checklist is run the controls through as much of their range as you can, watch the rotors change position appropriately. The 206 cockpit is narrow, so one can't really 'wipe' the cockpit with the cyclic, but you can check for full and free movement of the pedals and collective. Full right pedal, open the door and lean out to look at the T/R blades for appropriate pitch. The normal post start included checking that one could isolate the hydraulic system from the pump and the change in control effort is obvious. I can't remember if the controls moved to their trim position in the 206, but one would move them to assure that you could. A guess as to why this aircraft crashed? A yank and bank gone wrong? |
sure looks to me like the left skid toe catches something as they start up. If you play it slow I believe i see the skid deforming a bit down at the same time the ascent is suddenly arrested.
|
Probably not relevant but I seem to remember from my years ago on 206s, that it is possible to fit the main gearbox support links the wrong way round, as they are handed, and this can affect the handling when collective is pulled. It is however a memory from way back.
We also had a pilot who complained that the aircraft took off as he rolled the throttle up, so one of our engineers went out and took the collective clamp off and put the lever down. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:32. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.