Aerial photography below 500ft AGL in the US
What's the procedure in the US to ask the FAA for permission for helicopter-based aerial photography below 500ft above-ground-level in areas where the 500ft rule (from 91.119) would be broken? I don't need to do this I'm just curious how much process, risk assessment and record keeping there is around this?
|
1 word.....
DRONES Customers will use drones. Cheaper. Quieter. Safer. |
Originally Posted by FairWeatherFlyer
(Post 10703679)
What's the procedure in the US to ask the FAA for permission for helicopter-based aerial photography below 500ft above-ground-level in areas where the 500ft rule (from 91.119) would be broken? I don't need to do this I'm just curious how much process, risk assessment and record keeping there is around this?
|
Originally Posted by FairWeatherFlyer
(Post 10703679)
What's the procedure in the US to ask the FAA for permission for helicopter-based aerial photography below 500ft above-ground-level in areas where the 500ft rule (from 91.119) would be broken? I don't need to do this I'm just curious how much process, risk assessment and record keeping there is around this?
(d) Helicopters, powered parachutes, and weight-shift-control aircraft. If the operation is conducted without hazard to persons or property on the surface - (1) A helicopter may be operated at less than the minimums prescribed in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section, provided each person operating the helicopter complies with any routes or altitudes specifically prescribed for helicopters by the FAA; |
Reg changes like that are the kind of thing that really should come up on a flight review.
|
Originally Posted by rudestuff
(Post 10704522)
Reg changes like that are the kind of thing that really should come up on a flight review.
|
Originally Posted by Sikpilot
(Post 10703753)
1 word.....
DRONES Customers will use drones. Cheaper. Quieter. Safer. |
Gordy The text of that regulation doesn't help to understand it unless you understand precisely what's meant by "complies with any routes or altitudes specifically prescribed for helicopters by the FAA"
|
Bit before my time, but didn't the Twilight Zone accident change risk assessment and have a lasting effect on aerial photography?
|
Originally Posted by FairWeatherFlyer
(Post 10707915)
Gordy The text of that regulation doesn't help to understand it unless you understand precisely what's meant by "complies with any routes or altitudes specifically prescribed for helicopters by the FAA"
|
Originally Posted by LRP
(Post 10708050)
It means that if the FAA has prescribed any routes or altitudes, then the operator must comply with them. If not, the operation may go below 500 ft as long as the operation does not pose hazards to persons or property on the surface.
"(d) Helicopters. Helicopters may be operated at less than the minimums prescribed in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section if the operation is conducted without hazard to persons or property on the surface. In addition, each person operating a helicopter shall comply with any routes or altitudes specifically prescribed for helicopters by the Administrator." |
Originally Posted by FairWeatherFlyer
(Post 10707915)
Gordy The text of that regulation doesn't help to understand it unless you understand precisely what's meant by "complies with any routes or altitudes specifically prescribed for helicopters by the FAA"
Originally Posted by FairWeatherFlyer
(Post 10707920)
Bit before my time, but didn't the Twilight Zone accident change risk assessment and have a lasting effect on aerial photography?
Dorcey wrote a good book BTW, |
Originally Posted by Gordy
(Post 10708268)
It means exactly that. If the FAA has published a route, for example, New York has specific routes for helicopters, or if the FAA control tower gives you a specific routing or altitude, then you must follow that. If not, then you can fly any altitude you wish, 20 feet if you wish.
Ahh yes, the Dorcey Wingo accident. When working on movie sets or even for documentaries etc one can be issued a waiver. Where I work we have a set waiver that allows us to go as close to people/property as needed to get the shot under certain circumstances. We have listed pilots, aircraft and have to produce a "production call list" along with each shot and the FAA will issue a specific waiver. All people inside the "shot area" must be signatory to the waiver etc. Details here: Form 7711 Dorcey wrote a good book BTW, Rise and Fall of Captain Methane |
Originally Posted by MikeNYC
(Post 10710127)
Additionally, one form of a 7711 waiver often comes in the form of a Motion Picture Manual, which, once approved, can simplify the waiver process and FSDO notification for frequent wavered work. See FSIMS Document Viewer
|
@Gordy that was more directed at the OP. I figured you're fully aware of the Motion Picture Manual.
|
Originally Posted by MikeNYC
(Post 10710367)
@Gordy that was more directed at the OP. I figured you're fully aware of the Motion Picture Manual.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:30. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.