PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   G-reg R22/44s night-lights (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/604650-g-reg-r22-44s-night-lights.html)

feathering tickles 25th Jan 2018 14:56

G-reg R22/44s night-lights
 
Do G-reg R22/44s still require the extra emergency night-lights mod to fly at night?

RMK 25th Jan 2018 14:59

Recommended, but not technically required

FSXPilot 25th Jan 2018 15:22


Originally Posted by RMK (Post 10031348)
Recommended, but not technically required


Do you have that in a CAA document or an EASA document?

RMK 25th Jan 2018 15:31

Recently did some night flying training (in a G-reg R44) and went over all the applicable night flight related rules with an instructor (don't know what he was reading from) However, I'm only speaking in regards to flying privately; not commercial.

On a side note, for those holding both EASA and FAA licenses, the "in-built" night flying privilege of the FAA license doesn’t work in UK as the UK FAA exemption includes the wording “DAY VFR only” – that I have directly from the CAA

md 600 driver 25th Jan 2018 18:13


Originally Posted by RMK (Post 10031374)
Recently did some night flying training (in a G-reg R44) and went over all the applicable night flight related rules with an instructor (don't know what he was reading from) However, I'm only speaking in regards to flying privately; not commercial.

On a side note, for those holding both EASA and FAA licenses, the "in-built" night flying privilege of the FAA license doesn’t work in UK as the UK FAA exemption includes the wording “DAY VFR only” – that I have directly from the CAA

Does that hold for Fâa pilots flying n reg helicopters.

rudestuff 25th Jan 2018 18:25

I wouldn't have thought so, their aircraft, their licence.

r22butters 25th Jan 2018 19:22


Originally Posted by RMK (Post 10031374)

On a side note, for those holding both EASA and FAA licenses, the "in-built" night flying privilege of the FAA license doesn’t work in UK as the UK FAA exemption includes the wording “DAY VFR only” – that I have directly from the CAA

Huh, so even with 350 hours of night in the R22 they'd say, sorry Yank, you ain't goin' nowheres 'till the Sun comes up?:sad:

feathering tickles 26th Jan 2018 20:06

Can anyone support this with some robust facts please?

jymil 26th Jan 2018 20:36

Are those extra lights really of any use ? I can‘t believe they‘ll make much of a difference during an emergency.

evil7 26th Jan 2018 21:38

I guess the clue is in the wording - they give “more” light😉
If that would help in an emergency depends on the kind of emergency I would think.

jymil 27th Jan 2018 09:43

In the air, extra lights are useless. I switch off the landing light pretty quickly on climb. Off-airport landings at night are not allowed anyway where I fly. And on an airport, there is usually sufficient lighting. So for normal operations, there is no need for an extra pair of lights. They just create additional drag.

Dick Sanford 27th Jan 2018 10:46


Originally Posted by jymil (Post 10032625)
Are those extra lights really of any use ? I can‘t believe they‘ll make much of a difference during an emergency.

Jymil
I designed the R22/R44 emergency lights many years ago. Properly set up they work really well and complied with the strict CAA requirements at the time of certification. Conducted the certification test flying with Nigel Talbot, the then CAA Test pilot rotorcraft. Before the light modification we were not able to show the student the reality of an engine off/autorotation to the ground as we were not able to fire off the schermuly frare without prior approval, except in an emergency.
Keep your RPM in the green. D

r22butters 27th Jan 2018 16:00


Originally Posted by jymil (Post 10033026)
In the air, extra lights are useless. I switch off the landing light pretty quickly on climb. Off-airport landings at night are not allowed anyway where I fly. And on an airport, there is usually sufficient lighting. So for normal operations, there is no need for an extra pair of lights. They just create additional drag.

I am just the opposite. I don't switch on the landing light until I'm at altitude. I feel up there it helps other trafffic see me. :E

jymil 29th Jan 2018 06:27


Originally Posted by r22butters (Post 10033338)
I don't switch on the landing light until I'm at altitude. I feel up there it helps other trafffic see me. :E

Well, this is what the navigation lights were intended for.

r22butters 29th Jan 2018 12:51


Originally Posted by jymil (Post 10034705)
Well, this is what the navigation lights were intended for.

Those aren't all that visible head on,...especially in a wee little chopper!

feathering tickles 29th Jan 2018 16:48

OP here, my original post was only about the regulation rather than who thinks what. Hoping that someone knows the rules...

RMK 29th Jan 2018 17:22

I spoke further with an instructor over the weekend. In brief, it’s a technical “grey area” for the R44, but stated clearly for the R66. Upon the EASA certification of the R66, it is explicitly stated it is OK for night VFR in normal production form.

https://www.easa.europa.eu/system/fi...6_Issue_02.pdf

This being done for the R66, it was apparently implied that the same applies to the R44 (I don’t know of anything specifically written though). The result is that many R44 owners have subsequently removed their “night kits” to get back the weight/drag they incurred.


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:11.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.