Sea Kings continue flying operations
http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and...cornwall-skies
Great to see the Sea Kings getting a second life. Not sure how military aircraft leased to a commercial operator to train a third party works from a regulatory perspective though, but still good to see them back in the air. |
I presume this would have to be conducted under CFAOS - interesting to do it with an aircraft that is no longer in service and wouldn't meet modern airworthiness standards.
|
What are they going to be doing J?
|
Originally Posted by Thomas coupling
(Post 9844255)
What are they going to be doing J?
skadi |
he Ministry of Defence is returning two Sea King Mk5 aircraft to service The aircraft are old and knackered (why they were taken out of service) and spares were a nightmare. Wonder how the SKPT and RTSA are packaging this up to get it cleared. MRCOA usually takes civilian aircraft, gives them a mil reg and allows operation under Mil rules - leasing a mil aircraft with no civilian registration is surely a different kettle of fish altogether. Can't be the cheapest solution to training a few German Navy SAR pilots. |
The Indians have bought sea kings too its for them isn't it?
|
This is to be the new HeliOps gig out of Portland I assume? Seems a lot of costs and effort for 14 months. There must be more work to follow?
|
XV666: which started life as 144/826 NAS and with that new helicopter smell, straight from Westlands in August 1970!
http://www.eacott.com.au/gallery/d/1...+Singapore.jpg |
Originally Posted by [email protected]
(Post 9844368)
Can't be the cheapest solution to training a few German Navy SAR pilots.
Skadi |
The Indians have bought sea kings too its for them isn't it? |
The only reason I ask was there was an email recently looking for crews in UK initially with ability to travel to Indian for several months.
Si |
Hi...are you sure you're not mixing up India with Pakistan ,which HeliData showed last issue as taking two MK.3 and five MK.4 (two for spares). List of serials published too. The German training deal has been on the cards since last year .AgainHdata alerted this at the time,with a/c based at Portland. Both h/c at Culdrose at present under return to service maintenance.
|
And I think the 3As went to Norway - there were only ever 6 of those anyway.
|
I hope as part of the operation they get to fly in Bournemouth direction. I would really like to see (and hear) a Sea King clattering overhead again ! Is it possible they will join joint exercises with the RNLI as the UK Coastguard currently do ?
|
Very much doubt that - sorry.
|
India.
Pakistan. Norway. Qatar. German Navy. Egypt. Only one's left using Westland SeaKings. Pakistan mount exocet on theirs. |
Originally Posted by Thomas coupling
(Post 9856991)
India.
Pakistan. Norway. Qatar. German Navy. Egypt. Only one's left using Westland SeaKings. Pakistan mount exocet on theirs. |
Oh you mean this lot - Sea King MK7 | Royal Navy:ok:
Had to laugh at the headline top speed of 90Kts on the same page as 'the future, Queen Elizabeth Aircraft Carrier'. How will their shiny new toy cope with a leaky Sea King dropping, fuel, hyds and gearbox oil on it? |
She might be old and leaky, but she does what it says on the tin, which is a hell of a lot more than the RN even dreamed of. However, I won't get involved in the inter-service banter arising from the RN's assertion in 2001 that she was "two generations ahead of AWACS". I'd have said three. :ok:
|
I spotted a grey & red Sea King flying east along the Bournemouth Eastcliff about 10:30 this morning. Is this just a coincidence ?
|
Originally Posted by Thomas coupling
(Post 9856991)
India.
Pakistan. Norway. Qatar. German Navy. Egypt. Only one's left using Westland SeaKings. Pakistan mount exocet on theirs.
Originally Posted by Duncan Bouquet
(Post 9857443)
....and the Royal Navy......
Belgian Ministry of Defence: Westland Sea King Mk 48 Interesting prioritization of the SK's SAR role in Belgian service:
I/C |
Originally Posted by Ian Corrigible
(Post 9859098)
...
I/C I assume poor Google translate? But I like it! Who said that computers have no humour? Drenkeling = drowning man Dronkaard = Drunkard Cheers SLB |
SLB,
Yes, a Google translate. Thanks for the explanation; I'd stereotypically pictured a guy trying to paddle across the Channel after one too many Westmalle Tripels... I/C |
Max Skylon...Your Sea King was heading to Vector Aerospace for repainting into HeliOperations colour scheme.
....and SeaKing ASAC 7s wil not be based on carrier but on support vessels as I understand it. |
Ref Crab's Post 18
Had to laugh at the headline top speed of 90Kts on the same page as 'the future, Queen Elizabeth Aircraft Carrier'. How will their shiny new toy cope with a leaky Sea King dropping, fuel, hyds and gearbox oil on it?
It's a novel idea for your ilk I know, but they are proffessionals, they will clean it up the same as they always did. |
dropping, fuel, hyds and gearbox oil on it They are always clean and they don't leak oil. |
In the mid-80s there was a spate of Sea King HAS Mk5 radar control set failures. (RAF - you had something similar, the box at head height with lots of black knobs). It transpired that someone with good intentions had put masking tape along the inner seams to stop oil, which dripped (poured) down from the MGB drip tray onto the LRU, then leaking out through ventilation grills onto the consoles/PPI display. Ventilation/cooling is usually quite important in avionics. CRSs were being removed with an inch of oil in them, cooked to perfection.
|
Originally Posted by heli1
(Post 9859391)
Max Skylon...Your Sea King was heading to Vector Aerospace for repainting into HeliOperations colour scheme.
|
Sorry to re-open an old thread but, having sighted a Westland Sea King Mk.5 four times in the last two weeks from the Bournemouth Eastcliff, I was wondering if anyone has an update on the HeliOps contract. I did read that there was a little 'local difficulty' with the coucil over the lease of the operating base at Portland at the start - I assume this was resolved !
|
HeliOps Difficulties?
HeliOps don’t lease the hangar, dispersal or runway.... they own it!
Planning issues were overcome as one of the many challenges facing the HeliOps team...... Weymouth Council have now accepted that HeliOps is lawfully using the site and that they now agree agree with Steve G’s Barrister..... and have issued a Certificate if Lawful use as a helicopter operating and maintenance facility with no restrictions. Looking forward to seeing more military types operating out of Portland! Well done HeliOps |
Have they got CFAOS approval?
|
|
A question designed to do nothing but cause mischief.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/674702/MAA_Approved_Organizations.pdf That was difficult, come on crab, you're better than that. |
Originally Posted by Ian Corrigible
(Post 9859098)
...and the Belgium Air Component...
Belgian Ministry of Defence: Westland Sea King Mk 48 |
A question designed to do nothing but cause mischief. Are they an ATO as well? |
Wouldn't have thought so, one regulator and all that. I'm not going to do your research for you again, if it bothers you, you can find out and let us know.
|
What a warm and friendly tone your posts have - a little ray of sunshine.
I'm still interested to know how an aircraft that has been taken out of service (mks 3, 4 and 5) because they were all knackered and had a shortage of spares has been brought back as airworthy for the purposes of what is a commercial operation. Love to see the Release to Service:ok: Someone in the MAA has oversight of this and is 'taking the risk' - senior Navy officer perchance? Someone is the DDH and ODH for this operation under CFAOS. |
Without wanting to join the apparently-ill-tempered part of the thread, could/would someone answer an idly-curious question please?
I was operating along the ridge above Portsmouth about 6 weeks ago, monitoring Fleetlands as I left Solent's area, when I saw what appeared to my tired old eyes a Mk3a going into whatever they call the RNAY these days. No squawk observed; the nice person at Fleetlands said they transit on one radio only, no avionics. As mentioned above, I'm only being inquisitive - what are the ex-RAF SKs being used or flown for? |
Being sold to Pakistan and flown most likely by their military pilots. A collection of mk3/4’s as a package.
|
Originally Posted by [email protected]
(Post 10026612)
I'm still interested to know how an aircraft that has been taken out of service (mks 3, 4 and 5) because they were all knackered and had a shortage of spares has been brought back as airworthy for the purposes of what is a commercial operation.
Love to see the Release to Service:ok: |
All times are GMT. The time now is 15:17. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.