Pumping the cyclic for rotor RPM's
I have heard tale that moving the cyclic back and forth in a fairly rapid manner will help gain RPM's. Is this true? I presume that it wouldn't be affective at low airspeeds? Thanks
|
Doing rapid small movements with the collective will recover RRPM, but rapidly moving the cyclic will just reduce TRT (lift).
|
Originally Posted by fadecdegraded
(Post 9757397)
Doing rapid small movements with the collective will recover RRPM, but rapidly moving the cyclic will just reduce TRT (lift).
Lowering the lever will recover RRPM as long as it is lowered sufficiently for Tq to overcome drag, but how does "pumping" help? Do movements of the cyclic measurably reduce TRT aerodynamically? How? |
I'm pretty sure that pumping the cyclic offers no benefit in any circumstance!
|
"I thought," he said, "that if the world was going to end we were meant to lie down or put a paper bag over our head or something." "If you like, yes," said Ford. "Will that help?" asked the barman. "No," said Ford and gave him a friendly smile. |
Rapid aft cyclic will produce flare effect and increase Nr - rapid forward cyclic will do the opposite. Alternating the two will just make for an unpleasant ride.
Just lower the lever and flare if you want to recover Nr - if you have some speed then rolling and pulling into a turn will help. Just try the 'pumping' thing in a normal auto and see what happens - not comfortable and not useful. If you wash some speed off with flare to increase Nr and then gently move the cyclic forward you can get a second bite as long as you still have speed but it's probably no more effective than just holding or tightening the flare in the first place. |
Pumping the collective won't help you gain RRPM above governed rpm, but it will help prevent the RRPM decaying momentarily. It is a recovery technique used often in low & slow operations to recover from an over pitching situation where the torque required to keep flying is greater than what the engine can deliver(piston that is.) Lowering the collective slightly for a second or 2 unloads the engine slightly & allows it to regain RPM, just to lose it again as you raise the collective slightly for a second or 2 to prevent descending into the trees etc. Repeating this results in a "pumping" action on the collective & if you have left yourself an avenue where you can regain some forward airspeed & fly away &/or turn into wind it could save the day. Note I called it a "recovery" technique, that means you stuffed it up in the first place to be in an overpitching situation, now you need to balance engine power available & aerodynamics for a few critical seconds to keep flying.
Turning downwind while hovering on power line insulator inspections in an R44 is a great Way to get lots of practice with this technique, but if you don't always have a "way out" & screw the throttle to the max stop(don't rely on the governor) you"ll pump the collective all the way to the crash site. |
There used to be a bit of a fairy tale with the Whirlwind/S55. When you were grappling for lift climbing vertically out of a clearing in Borneo. The theory was that if you slightly stirred the cyclic in an anti-clockwise direction this would encourage the blades, going the same direction, to generate more lift.
I never tried it. The technique I used was to climb almost to the top, then forward cyclic and downwash would would flatten the leaves and branches on the trees so that the rest of the airframe missed it. A kind of 'tree cushion'. |
Heliduck - I assumed the OP was talking about in auto with no engine power - I might be wrong.
FED - yes the same myth was purported to work on the Wessex but for confined areas, using right pedal to offload the TR and coming out in a slight spiral climb seemed to be more effective. |
Originally Posted by [email protected]
(Post 9757735)
...using right pedal to offload the TR and coming out in a slight spiral climb seemed to be more effective.
|
In the Huey....oft times you were going to turn right on takeoff....no matter what you had in mind to begin with. After a while one planned it so that would take you into Wind as it going to down wind was the exact wrong option.
|
Originally Posted by 212man
(Post 9757595)
I'm pretty sure that pumping the cyclic offers no benefit in any circumstance!
|
Doing that rapid movement back and forth with the cyclic in a Huey will result in "Pylon Rock". Single or twin Huey. Not fun.
JD |
Originally Posted by obnoxio f*ckwit
(Post 9757782)
Certainly worked coming out of places like Forkhill! Trick was judging when to go for the fence...
The tailwheel dings in the top of the metal fence at Dungannon always made me smile. Alongside one quite minor one was the pilot's name. The one next to it was quite a bit bigger and it was marked "OC * Flight". Back to the OPs question: If you stir the stick, you are over-controlling and creating more drag in the process. It surely can't increase rotor RPM. |
My understanding is that "milking the collective" momentarily reduces pitch and there fore drag and let's the RPM recover.
Obviously the RPM has to be low in the first place and only really used it in anger in piston machines, but it works. Also tried it in a 206 one day and could hold a hover with few percent less tq while milking the collective. As far as moving the cyclic around goes it destroys lift as the TRT vector is all over the place and not acting in one place or close too it and more power is required |
Originally Posted by [email protected]
(Post 9757735)
Heliduck - I assumed the OP was talking about in auto with no engine power - I might be wrong.
FED - yes the same myth was purported to work on the Wessex but for confined areas, using right pedal to offload the TR and coming out in a slight spiral climb seemed to be more effective. For the OP, undoubtedly bad advice or bad crewroom gossip. moving the cyclic back and forth in a fairly rapid manner will help gain RPM's is not only unlikely to help but can be dangerous by leading to mast bumping, as already mentioned := |
pumping thou self has more merit than pumping the cyclic
|
Having flown quite a few helicopter types now I would say it's an almost universal constant that pumping any control is not a good idea. In cyclic you might inadvertantly get past what is called the crossover point and find your merry stick waggling gets out of phase with the response (cue huge PIO). In collective you can set off a resonance in the engine control system which can destroy the engine. These are of course the extremes - usually you just achieve nothing but a queasy stomach.
The ways to increase NR are few and well understood: more power to the head at constant blade pitch; less blade pitch with constant (or no) power; flare effect (assuming you have some airspeed); increasing the rate of descent in auto (eg in a turn); and finally turning in the opposite direction to that where you get a torque spike (ie left for French helicopters - this lowers drag on the head). Another one might be to do a huge input of off-power pedal in the hover meaning that the main rotor briefly gets all the power from the engine and briefly speeds up the head. Anyone else think of any? |
I've been involved in several flight tests where we "pumped" each control axis at various frequencies, and never has there been any appreciable change in the average NR or torque values during or after the maneuver.
NR and torque do change up and down (symmetrically) in response to the control inputs, but once the input has ceased the parameters are right back where they started. |
There is a good chance that a Bell 47 pilot would be familiar with "pumping the collective" in order to regain rotor rpm. I DON'T advise this technique in any helicopter.
https://dms.ntsb.gov/public/47500-47...854/423140.pdf |
All times are GMT. The time now is 12:04. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.