PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   EC225 crash near Bergen, Norway April 2016 (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/578298-ec225-crash-near-bergen-norway-april-2016-a.html)

What happens if I pr 30th Apr 2016 11:28

Just for info, since the REDW incident, all oil and gas aircraft flying in the North Sea have to have a hums download and the data analysis before d next flight. this is a CRS requirement needing a signature from a qualified engineer.
Any HUMS issues between flights have to be logged and reported, delaying or stopping the next flight as necessary.

squib66 30th Apr 2016 11:38

REDHANDED (13 posts in 5.5 years, half on this thread): Well done on your rapid learning!!!!:hmm:

At 08:26 you said:

Why are the authorities so against forcing the operators to monitor and use the HUMS data?
By 12:04 you have found the CAP that supports the UK regulation that requires HUMS (the Norwegian have a rule in the BSL too and EASA have published the rule to expand that across Europe):


The guidance to operators given in CAP 753 states that the period between the successful download and assessment of any primary VHM indicator, used for monitoring the engine and rotor drive system components, should not exceed 25 hours.
However that is the MEL limit not the guidance on how often to download*.

The CAA guidance earlier in that CAP is that HUMS should be downloaded ideally even during rotors running turnarounds.


Just for info, since the REDW incident, all oil and gas aircraft flying in the North Sea have to have a hums download and the data analysis before d next flight.
Though that was common practice with some operators before.

However, at this stage assumptions of what or might not have detected something and when are fantasy only.


but we went round and round this buoy at the time and it got tedious.
ahmen

* OGP don't even quote that as they still refer to a CAP that was redundant when CAP753 was issued in 2006! OGP guidelines are only for daily downloads (and I'm sure they would oppose rotors running HUMS downloads, especially offshore).

REDHANDED 30th Apr 2016 11:41


Originally Posted by What happens if I pr (Post 9361493)
Just for info, since the REDW incident, all oil and gas aircraft flying in the North Sea have to have a hums download and the data analysis before d next flight. this is a CRS requirement needing a signature from a qualified engineer.
Any HUMS issues between flights have to be logged and reported, delaying or stopping the next flight as necessary.

I know, but it's not stopping accidents happening. The alerts are only as good as the algorithms used to set them. We need more data inputs from the manufacturers and operators to enable better alert thresholds to be set so that warnings can be actioned in good time. I question the manufacturers current advice on how to act upon warnings from the HUMS. It was wrong wrt G-REDW

stacey_s 30th Apr 2016 11:43

In the video it is interesting to see that there are only four blades still attached.

squib66 30th Apr 2016 11:45

REDHANDED credit where credit is due, this point is sound.


The alerts are only as good as the algorithms used to set them. We need more data inputs from the manufacturers and operators to enable better alert thresholds to be set so that warnings can be actioned in good time.
Though there is no guarantee that every failure will be detectable.

REDHANDED 30th Apr 2016 11:49


Originally Posted by squib66 (Post 9361500)
REDHANDED (13 posts in 5.5 years, half on this thread): Well done on your rapid learning!!!!:hmm:

At 08:26 you said:


By 12:04 you have found the CAP that supports the UK regulation that requires HUMS (the Norwegian have a rule in the BSL too and EASA have published the rule to expand that across Europe):



However that is the MEL limit not the guidance on how often to download*.

The CAA guidance earlier in that CAP is that HUMS should be downloaded ideally even during rotors running turnarounds.



Though that was common practice with some operators before.

However, at this stage assumptions of what or might not have detected something and when are fantasy only.

ahmen

* OGP don't even quote that as they still refer to a CAP that was redundant when CAP753 was issued in 2006! OGP guidelines are only for daily downloads (and I'm sure they would oppose rotors running HUMS downloads, especially offshore).

Thanks, a prime example of why we aren't getting anywhere with safety! You think it's tedious to try and influence how we approach a subject that has potential to save lives?

farsouth 30th Apr 2016 11:53


In the video it is interesting to see that there are only four blades still attached.
Not sure what video you are looking at, but the one of the rotor coming down appears (to me) to clearly show five blades.

PlasticCabDriver 30th Apr 2016 11:58


Originally Posted by REDHANDED (Post 9361476)
Tedious??!! Maybe if something was done to take the data and procedures more seriously lives would have been saved.

No. What is tedious is the the ill- and misinformed coming on and spouting off without knowing some basic details. Again, I direct that comment at nobody in particular.

I thought I would provide a source document of some facts (notwithstanding that the ditchings happened 4 years ago and a lot has gone on since then, Mitchaa mentions it above) that we can all use as a starting point for our discussions rather than what somebody was told in the pub by his mate who works offshore.

squib66 30th Apr 2016 11:59


Thanks, a prime example of why we aren't getting anywhere with safety! You think it's tedious to try and influence how we approach a subject that has potential to save lives?
No of course not!

Its just you are also firing a speculative blame out in all directions at the same time (including on 4 year-old accidents you had no prior comment on).

stacey_s 30th Apr 2016 12:00

Paused the video in multiple places and I only see four, mind you ay 64 years old and 49 years in the industry may have made my eyes a bit knackered. :)

Codprawn 30th Apr 2016 12:15

There is a very clear photo on page 2 of this post that shows the rotor on the ground. Some videos are clearer than others as well - looks like all blades intact to me but of course damage not clear.

ironbutt57 30th Apr 2016 12:16

I count 5 as well

Max Contingency 30th Apr 2016 12:32

Professional helicopter pilots buy a ticket in the Great Gearbox Lottery every time we fly.

We have all heard of rotor head separation before but I believe that this is the first time it has ever been captured on camera.

To see that rotor head, the size of a small house, rotating down without the rest of the aircraft sent a chill right down my spine.

Yes the passengers would have been terrified but only the pilots would have known the absolute finality of what was happening.

Made an entry in my diary, simply says: "Bugger" :(

Non-Driver 30th Apr 2016 12:55


Originally Posted by Max Contingency (Post 9361552)
Professional helicopter pilots buy a ticket in the Great Gearbox Lottery every time we fly.

We have all heard of rotor head separation before but I believe that this is the first time it has ever been captured on camera.

To see that rotor head, the size of a small house, rotating down without the rest of the aircraft sent a chill right down my spine.

Yes the passengers would have been terrified but only the pilots would have known the absolute finality of what was happening.

Made an entry in my diary, simply says: "Bugger" :(

For the occupants sake I hope it turns out to be a siezure prior to fracture as the g forces would have done for them instantly.

TylerMonkey 30th Apr 2016 13:01

Freeze frame shows 5 blades in video at various stages. IMO

http://i86.servimg.com/u/f86/11/94/64/62/image10.png

http://imbo.vgtv.no/users/bt_/images...]=1800x1012q50

Apate 30th Apr 2016 13:17

Perhaps Redhanded would be well advised to educate himself where the industry is now with HUMS rather than look back at history and outdated CAA guidelines.
Safety Information | HeliOffshore

I also see 5 blades on the video!

bikeface 30th Apr 2016 13:20

condolences to all involved, another sad day.
on the subject of HUMS i'm glad to see my company checking after every flight. it takes 15mins to check.

REDHANDED 30th Apr 2016 13:28


Originally Posted by Apate (Post 9361589)
Perhaps Redhanded would be well advised to educate himself where the industry is now with HUMS rather than look back at history and outdated CAA guidelines.
Safety Information | HeliOffshore

I also see 5 blades on the video!

Always happy to educate myself, thanks for the link. While I do, Maybe you could enlighten us as to where the industry is wrt HUMS.

M609 30th Apr 2016 13:28

Video of the recovery of the main body of the fuselage


High res image of the rotor head on the ground

jimf671 30th Apr 2016 13:37

1 Attachment(s)
LN-OJF


Originally Posted by Capt. Inop (Post 9360647)


G-REDL

Attachment 235


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:52.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.