PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Rotorheads (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads-23/)
-   -   Helicopter Pilots Salaries (https://www.pprune.org/rotorheads/275902-helicopter-pilots-salaries.html)

NLJ 14th May 2007 14:13

Helicopter Pilots Salaries
 
I know a recent thread went on at length about salaries and what level they should be at, but I have been asked to research current salary levels with a view to overhauling the system we have in place at the moment here at the Lancashire Police Air Support Unit. This has come about due to the minimal response (3) to our recent job vacancy advertised in Flight International. I'm looking for information principally from the Public Transport and Corporate sectors in the UK, on Line Pilot and Chief Pilot salaries, together with variations caused by the possession of an IR or specialised working environment. If you could respond in the form of PM, anonymously if you prefer, it would be appreciated. With sufficient data I'll publish the results which will hopefully be of benefit to others.

Canadian Rotorhead 15th May 2007 00:16

Salary survey
 
Here's a link that may help...



http://http://brian.hudson.home.mchs...ales/index.htm

Impress to inflate 15th May 2007 12:52

Try www.pilotjobsnetwork.com. You should get some info there

ROTORVATION 16th May 2007 09:31

response to info requested
 
Dear NLJ,

Please read your PM's, I have just sent you an Email.

Best regards

Rotorvation:ok:

Bertie Thruster 17th May 2007 20:47

………So the Direct Employment “honeymoon” is over and the police bean counters have decided to ignore the maxim that 'you only get what you pay for' and are now trying to get their pilots even more cheaply.

When it came along a few years ago (carried along in the shirt tails of “Best Value”) direct employment originally saved the Feds cash while at the same time giving their experienced, loyal pilots a much needed salary boost when compared to their contractor pay.

Now direct employers are reining in on costs with veiled threats to their pilot workforce to lump it otherwise the air support units (and thus the pilots jobs) could be at stake! (even though the pilots salaries are only a small part of the overall cost)

It is even rumoured some units presently changing to direct employment are going to offer the pilots packages that will be lower than their present contractor remuneration!

This is indeed a sorry state for the onshore industry to be in.

‘Offshore’ got it right in 2001 and 2005; professionally led pay negotiations with benchmarking against the fixed wing sector. ( Even so, as of last week in Aberdeen, where in 2007 for the first time a line pilot will break through the £100k ceiling, it is rumoured that Bristows are still short of 19 pilots and CHC are short 24!)


NLJ. If its any help to you in your police beancounter negotiations, I understand the CAA have recently engaged consultants to carry out a “census” of commercial pilots salaries in the UK, in all sectors of the industry both fixed and rotary wing. I think the results are due soon.

anonythemouse 18th May 2007 09:21

Lancs ASU Job
 
Didn't actually see the advert but, being nosey, what was the package offered.

Bertie, nail hit firmly on the head methinks!

ShyTorque 18th May 2007 10:01

So much for employee loyalty (again). Eh, Bertie?
A few years ago it was a case of the employers telling pilots that they made no profit for the company - the only profit was in engineering and maintenance. At the same time they were also telling the engineers that no profit was made from their efforts - it was only made through pilotage. You know who I mean...

With the market being as it is, how do the police possibly hope to attract pilots for even less money whilst still demanding relatively highly experienced pilots? It's ridiculous to tell pilots they are putting the whole operation at risk by merely expecting a competitive salary.

IIRC, the whole business case for having ASUs in the first place centered around saving money, by saving man hours on ground searches.

Then direct employment was seen as best value, saving even more money..

Perhaps the Chief Constables should apply for charitable status for ASUs..... :rolleyes: (no, I'm not serious).

Whirlygig 18th May 2007 10:17

Police budgets and hence salaries are not dictated by “bean-counters” but by politicians as are all public sector salaries. Therefore, public sector and private sector salaries are not comparable.

The short term nature of public spending means that the “honeymoon period” will be about half as long as a term of office! Savings made in Year 1 by Direct Employment will, ipso facto, be forgotten about by Year 4 when the squeeze on budgets becomes greater. Rises in Council Tax are answerable to the electorate; rises in private sector salaries are answerable to shareholders only.

Public Sector salaries are used by the Chancellor as a tool for keeping down inflation. Inflation too high; public sector salary rises 2% for example when the rest of the private sector workforce can enjoy say, 5%.

As for ASUs not being able to fill posts, I suspect it’s not just a matter of salary but a genuine shortage of qualified people. I doubt whether there are any suitably qualified and experienced pilots on the dole at the moment, therefore anyone who may be suitable for the role would have to leave another job. This would probably involve relocation for some which may not be feasible for some due to other commitments.

So, the other approach to filling pilot vacancies should come from training those with less experience which is what other professions do!

Cheers

Whirls

PS- Bertie, you’ve spelt bean counters incorrectly, it should be spelt “those wonderful, lovely people in the Finance Department”.

Impress to inflate 18th May 2007 11:29

Whirls

"PS- Bertie, you’ve spelt bean counters incorrectly, it should be spelt “those wonderful, lovely people in the Finance Department”."


Don't you mean Abacus Wan&ers

helimutt 18th May 2007 11:35

Impress to Inflate, you obviously don't know what Whirls does for a living then? lmao:ok:

Whirlygig 18th May 2007 11:57

Never, ever p!$$ off an accountant.

If you prick us, do we not bleed,
If you tickle us, do we not laugh,
And if you wrong us, do we not seek revenge.

Cheers

Whirls

Bertie Thruster 18th May 2007 12:02

Whirls,


I think it will be much cheaper in the long run for the police to pay the benchmarked rate for experienced (twin, night, mountain, nvg, crm, bad wx, low level,etc) single pilot captains (available now from the 'usual source', for the right pay) than to set up their own training schools!

Regards, BT

R1Tamer 18th May 2007 12:16

Bertie Thruster

I'm pretty certain you're right - but hey "shy kids get now sweets". How about a serving Police Officer (17ys) with low hour CPL(H) and IR(H) - not quite the 'usual source' but got to be somewhere in the ball-park and I know two of them?

R1Tamer

Whirlygig 18th May 2007 12:16

Yes probably but since when did the public sector use common sense when it comes to saving money? Training budget vs salary budget? Different departments, different "pots".

Cheers

Whirls

airborne_artist 18th May 2007 14:32

You need to factor in that the FW market is picking up, and ex-mil RW guys can easily apply for the RAFCARS BA scheme (or Managed Path) - which requires 1500 hours of qualifying time, easily reached by those on their normal exit point. BA is not the only employer to be perfectly happy taking people on with low FW hours into the RHS.

It's a very different job, certainly, but a growing number of my ex-mil RW colleagues are now in the LHS of a big jet and very happy with the Ts and Cs.

SilsoeSid 23rd May 2007 13:46

Oh dear, the thread slipped down to page 3! :8

Hi NLJ,

I wondered if there was anything that you can tell us from the data you have gathered so far. I would assume that the data has been broken down to differentiate between corporate and police work, two different kettles of fish I think.

Also a breakdown of rates at urban and rural forces, 24 hour units and joint HEMS/police units would give a more detailed picture.

As far as I am aware direct employment rates for police line pilots range from £45k (rural) to £63k (urban).

NLJ 23rd May 2007 19:07

re:Salaries
 
SilsoeSid,

The info is trickling in very slowly, when I get enough to publish something of value I will do so.
If there is anyone out there who wants to PM me then please do. Any information given will be treated as confidential.

NLJ.

keepin it in trim 23rd May 2007 20:48

I made the jump from heli to fixed wing just over 2 years ago. I was a tri/tre, sp ir on the ec135 for a large on shore operator. I am now a line training captain for a major fractional jet operator (fill in the gaps if you like). I enjoyed flying the ec135 and the people I worked with were a great bunch, but I also work with a great bunch of people now. I also now have a stable roster, more time off, t and c's which overall are as good or better, oh and including my per diems my salary is roughly double.

When I started flying onshore commercial I brought with me around 5800 experience 4000 of that on heavy twin rotary, day/night, nvg and ifr. The simple facts are that if you want quality people with good experience the pool is getting smaller. The north sea pays well, the asu/air ambulance sector does not, I do not see it ever reaching North Sea levels, but it needs to get a lot better if it going to attract the right sort of people into a satisfying but also very demanding part of the helicopter world.

Sorry if this seems a little off topic but I think that guys in the on shore market are getting quite a lot less than they are worth.

Helinut 23rd May 2007 22:26

KIIT,
Not off topic at all IMO - absolutely on the button it seems to me. It is all about making comparisons, against a series of factors and elements that go to make up a job and the people that do it.
I believe there are signs that the onshore parapublic hele business is already lowering its standards, in terms of the required experience for pilots they are taking on. I wonder how long it will be before we see a sad result arising from those undesirable changes.
I am aware of at least 1 very scary "near miss" at night which has resulted in the "passengers" at a base insisting that a pilot was removed from the roster. He had very limited experience of both night flying and twins. I just hope that such things are always caught at that point and nothing more serious occurs........
It has been suggested on threads here and elsewhere that the new PITO framework will involve substantial rises in the rates that contractors charge their customers for police pilotage. I wonder whether any of those rises will be seen in the wage packets of the pilots. I am not holding my breath personally, but that would be the rational and fair outcome.
Helinut

SilsoeSid 23rd May 2007 23:19


It has been suggested on threads here and elsewhere that the new PITO framework will involve substantial rises in the rates that contractors charge their customers for police pilotage.
Simple for the customer then isn't it.

Employ your own pilots, pay them a little more than they are already on, after all they will be getting paid more than before, and the savings will grow exponentially.

Tea and medals for the bean counters! Sorry, “those wonderful, lovely people in the Finance Department”.

If the pilots don't like it, 'because we can lower the required standards and someone will always be available', they can make their own choice.

It would seem to some that the view of some employers is the same as a saying we had in 660 Sqn,

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g1...sid/660zap.jpg


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:31.


Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.