Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Aerodynamic Formulas for Helos

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Aerodynamic Formulas for Helos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd April 2003 | 19:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Question Aerodynamic Formulas for Helos

I am looking for the relative formulas for calculating the basic properties of a helicopter rotor.
The reason for this is that I want to make a RC chopper from scratch and would like to work out the basic characteristics before I commit cash and build it.
I have built some planes and gliders before, so I am familiar with basic aero principals, and I am half way through a degree so the math isnt to much of a problem either.
Any sites with the relevant info would be very apreciated, or if some one knows them and wants to put them up here that would be great too.
I know there are some books with it but being fairly broke paying to fly right know, I dont have alot to spare, however any book recomendations would be appreciated. However it needs to be more helicopter design and principals than general aero.
I am currently a student helo pilot, so the extra theory couldnt hurt.
Spaced is offline  
Old 24th April 2003 | 04:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Spaced,

If you send an e-mail to [email protected] I'll attach a small DOS program called 'Hover.exe' and its associated files to the reply.

You can run the .exe program and/or read the C-code in the .cpp file.

Hope this helps.
Dave_Jackson is offline  
Old 24th April 2003 | 08:18
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Australia
Dave, I have sent you an email could you let me know if you havent received it.
Spaced is offline  
Old 24th April 2003 | 15:48
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 3,670
Likes: 1
From: UK
Mmm, your handle was well chosen, methinks
Thomas coupling is offline  
Old 24th April 2003 | 19:52
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Australia

Must be cause Im not sure I understand.
Spaced is offline  
Old 25th April 2003 | 00:47
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 345
Likes: 2
From: UK
Red face

There are no formulas, but there may be formulae!
Putting aside such a pedantic comment, to be more helpful I recall that Mr Reynolds and his Numbers may pose you problems scaling down from real size to models.
Good luck with your project.
idle stop is offline  
Old 25th April 2003 | 15:16
  #7 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,479
Likes: 178
From: UK
Back when I was learning Helicopter aerodynamics at University there were various books that were invaluable.

My favourite at the time was a big silver tome by Ray Prouty, the name of which escapes me (but wasn't helicopter aerodynamics, which is his non-formulae book).

Subsequently I converted my favours to "Fundamentals of Helicopter Flight" by Simon Newman, which I'd strongly recommend for the basic formulae of helicopter design (or, surreally, windmill design, which is the last chapter of the book). You can buy it from Amazon or a good university bookshop (good here is defined as a university which not only offers aeronautical engineering courses, but teaches helicopter design as well - this probably means Southampton or Glasgow).


If you find yourself buying an American textbook, a word of warning. American helicopter aerodynamicists arrive at their coefficients by dividing by rho-V-squared, whilst British helicopter aerodyamicists (and fixed wing aerodynamicists everywhere) divide by half-rho-V-squared. So, the coefficients for helicopter performance and stability in American helicopter textbooks are (probably) always half the value of the same coefficients in anybody elses books. This can lead you astray if you aren't expecting it.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 25th April 2003 | 16:52
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Australia
me Spel , good no? nExt grama u ficks Me on good!

Sorry didnt realise I was on JH.

Thomas coupling,
I dont want to scale something down, I want to see if a couple of my ideas work in reality, and I am aware of what a pain in the but Mr Reynolds can be.

Genghis the Engineer,
I wasnt aware of the difference in the co-efficients. All the work I have done uses 1/2*rho*v^2, why the difference?

Thanx for the replies.
Spaced is offline  
Old 25th April 2003 | 17:07
  #9 (permalink)  
Moderator
30 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Reserves
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 14,479
Likes: 178
From: UK
Not the foggiest old boy, I just know that it's there and one should be careful which system is in use when using somebody else's formulae for helicopter aerodynamics.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.