Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Mt Hood crash report

Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Mt Hood crash report

Old 18th Sep 2002, 16:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 16,276
Received 925 Likes on 460 Posts
Mt Hood crash report

From Associated Press

PORTLAND, Ore. -- Pilot error and a lack of power caused an Air Force Reserve helicopter to crash while performing a high-altitude rescue mission on Mt. Hood in May, military investigators said Tuesday.

Investigators said several factors contributed to the crash of the Pave Hawk helicopter at 10,700 feet, including failure to follow proper procedure when calculating how much power the helicopter needed and the pilot's slow reaction time when the aircraft began to falter.

The investigators said the helicopter did not malfunction.

The incident on May 30 began when several climbers lost their footing on Oregon's highest mountain and began sliding down a glacier about 800 feet below the 11,245-foot summit. They collided with two other parties of climbers, sending nine people into a crevasse.

Three people--49-year-old William Ward and 48-year-old Richard Read, both of Forest Grove, and John Biggs, 62, of Windsor, Calif.--died in the accident.

Five hours later, the Air Force Reserve helicopter was hovering above the climbers--and was preparing to haul one up by cable--when it started rocking and moving backward, losing control in the icy mountain air.

The nose of the helicopter crashed into the slope, thrusting its body into the mountain and shattering its rotors as it rolled 200 feet down the slope. Four of six crew members were tossed out of an open side door. All of the crew members were injured, but only one seriously.

A series of mistakes led to the crash, investigators said Tuesday.

Flight engineers miscalculated how much power the chopper needed to complete the rescue by about 6%, they said. In addition, flight engineers made the first power calculations using manual charts, but they did not perform a second manual calculation as required by Air Force procedure.

Instead, the flight engineers used a flight instrument that had been decertified since January to verify their manual calculations, said Col. Stephen Duresky, the lead investigator.

Duresky said dramatically changing headwinds could have complicated the situation. When the chopper took off, winds were blowing at 12 to 15 knots, but they got stronger quickly, he said.

Once the helicopter began losing power and faltering in the air, the pilot's slow reaction time caused it to go into a nose dive, Duresky said.

The pilot should have immediately released the cable attached to the stretcher holding the injured climber below, turned to the left and circled back. Instead, Duresky said, crewmen didn't release the cable until the helicopter--out of control--attempted to land, but instead crashed.

"The one decision the pilots make is, 'Can we do the mission or can't we?' They decided they could and made an error," Duresky said.

Although it will cost $4.7 million to repair, Duresky said the Pave Hawk will fly again.
ORAC is online now  
Old 19th Sep 2002, 01:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Hartford, CT USA
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
its good to hear that the crewman lived, if my memory serves me correctly, the recommended actions were also the ones discussed on this board. I really learned a lot from that discussion.
Barannfin is offline  
Old 19th Sep 2002, 19:51
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lost in thought
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That's really upsetting.
Especially considering the flight management system (ENS CDU) in the Pave Hawk provides an electronic version of the hover performance charts that are a lot more accurate that a pencil and ruler on the FM charts.

They could have easily re-calculated and re-verified in flight.
Avnx EO is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Copyright © 2023 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.