H160 Question ?
Thread Starter

Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 563
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Morning All,
Have a question, am chatting with friends who are looking at H160s for VIP work but I remember companies like JC Bamford I think it was rejected these and a couple of other companies also got rid of theirs. Can anyone here tell me what the reasons were behind them.
Many thanks from Ulaan Baatur
Ned
Have a question, am chatting with friends who are looking at H160s for VIP work but I remember companies like JC Bamford I think it was rejected these and a couple of other companies also got rid of theirs. Can anyone here tell me what the reasons were behind them.
Many thanks from Ulaan Baatur
Ned

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 541
From: Lost again...
Hi Ned
The word at the time was that JCB had returned theirs because it did not achieve the promised performance metrics and also because of a number of additional ADs and inspections that meant the maintenance burden had become impractical for pilot only operations without taking an engineer with them everywhere.
The word at the time was that JCB had returned theirs because it did not achieve the promised performance metrics and also because of a number of additional ADs and inspections that meant the maintenance burden had become impractical for pilot only operations without taking an engineer with them everywhere.


Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,371
Likes: 926
From: Den Haag
I also thought it was C of G related. We manage a privately owned 160 (CAMO, 145, pilot and training) but it has the semi-VIP cabin not the whole ACH cocoon. Ned - message me if you have some specific questions.




