Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Heathrow Zone (Heli) Air Law question

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Heathrow Zone (Heli) Air Law question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th April 2025 | 22:58
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 508
Likes: 31
From: UK
Heathrow Zone (Heli) Air Law question

Forgive me if I’m missing something straightforward here.

Today, whilst en route to Battersea via the Helilanes I heard Heathrow issue another helicopter (twin) a clearance from Ally Pally - Brent - Battersea “VFR Not above 1300ft on Heathrow QNH1023”.

Is this a legal height to fly over the congested area in respect to the 1000ft rule?

I've not studied the map to check the heights of every building along that route but I’m pretty sure there will be structures in excess of 300ft tall within 600m of the route.

Could this be a throwback to when Heathrow used to be Class A so that particular routing was SVFR so exempt the 1000ft Rule?

I note that the UK AIP entry for Heathrow exempts the 1000ft Rule along the Helilanes, but I don’t see any mention of it for Ally Pally to Battersea. Do we need a Route establishing to protect the pilots of the twins that fly that route frequently?

Please someone explain.

JJ
jellycopter is offline  
Reply
Old 25th April 2025 | 07:31
  #2 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,111
Likes: 1,085
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Jelly, on an ATC clearance in CAS a pilot doesn’t have to comply with the 1,000ft rule, as in the case here, but there is no exemption from the 500ft rule*. Complying with the latter is forever more difficult over London due to the increase in high rise building projects; technically speaking consideration must be given to separation, even when following the published heli-routes!

Twin engined helis (obviously not singles) are commonly given direct clearances such as the one you heard.

*I do know of one pilot of a twin engined heli who bust the 500’ rule in a very blatant way trying to continue on the commonly given BRENT - BATTERSEA clearance in very low cloud and was reported to the CAA.
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply
Old 25th April 2025 | 07:51
  #3 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 40
Likes: 2
From: London
I wondered if the 500 ft rule can also be exempted by ATC?
ANO 2016, Schedule 3, Part 4 — Exemptions from low flying prohibitions The following aircraft are exempt from the low flying prohibitions in Part 3 (i.e. the 500ft rule): Aircraft flying in accordance with instructions given by an air traffic control unit.
love flying is offline  
Reply
Old 25th April 2025 | 13:18
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 508
Likes: 31
From: UK
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
Jelly, on an ATC clearance in CAS a pilot doesn’t have to comply with the 1,000ft rule, as in the case here,
That's an interesting take on things and something I always understood to be the case when I was in the military (you may have even be my instructor that explained as such!).

However, the exemptions from the 1000ft rule are clearly stated in the regs, and I can't find mention of an ATC clearance granting an exemption. Indeed, the Helilanes require an ATC clearance yet there's a specific exemption from the 1000ft rule in print in relation to those. Why bother printing it for the Helilanes if a simple ATC clearance implied an exemption?

####e, I don't suppose you've got chapter and verse to support your assertion that you could point me towards do you?

JJ
jellycopter is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.