Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Korean S-76 Firefighting Incident

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Korean S-76 Firefighting Incident

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th March 2025 | 13:09
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 31
Likes: 1
From: Connecticut
Korean S-76 Firefighting Incident

Looking for more information about the model/serial of this aircraft, all replies are appreciated.

https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/nat...81_395005.html

EDIT (additional sources)
https://asn.flightsafety.org/wikibase/490716

Last edited by OttoRotate; 26th March 2025 at 17:20.
OttoRotate is offline  
Reply
Old 26th March 2025 | 15:34
  #2 (permalink)  
40 Countries Visited
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 518
Likes: 50
From: London/Atlanta
According to ASN it was an S76, one person/pilot onboard, unfortunately a fatal and aircraft destroyed. No REG number confirmed at this point.

nomorehelosforme is online now  
Reply
Old 26th March 2025 | 16:37
  #3 (permalink)  
30 Countries Visited
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,081
Likes: 189
From: Redding CA, or on a fire somewhere
Other than providing top cover and IR support, the S-76 has got to be the worst aircraft one would choose for fire fighting........

And a 73 year old pilot-----RIP.
Gordy is offline  
Reply
Old 26th March 2025 | 18:47
  #4 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,373
Likes: 931
From: Den Haag
A couple of options: https://www.jetphotos.com/airline/Air%20Palace
212man is offline  
Reply
Old 26th March 2025 | 20:01
  #5 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 57
From: UK
Originally Posted by Gordy
Other than providing top cover and IR support, the S-76 has got to be the worst aircraft one would choose for fire fighting........
And they’ve got/had a fleet of 24 of them!

“According to the Korea Forest Service, 23 other S-76 helicopters remain available, and it plans to put them back in operation if they pass safety tests.”
Bravo73 is offline  
Reply
Old 26th March 2025 | 20:19
  #6 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,060
Likes: 563
From: Auckland, New Zealand
Talking to friends flying on that fire in Korea and very smoky conditions and flew into a cable. Other aircraft were sitting at the airport.
KiwiNedNZ is offline  
Reply
Old 26th March 2025 | 21:00
  #7 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 379
Likes: 68
From: canada
very sad...
twinstar_ca is offline  
Reply
Old 26th March 2025 | 23:21
  #8 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 880
Likes: 225
From: Australia
Originally Posted by KiwiNedNZ
Talking to friends flying on that fire in Korea and very smoky conditions and flew into a cable...
That seems somewhat consistent with this extract from the third news item linked by ASN: "...According to witnesses at the time of the accident, the helicopter crashed after being caught in a telephone pole while containing fire extinguishing water".

Those details may have been somewhat scrambled in translation?

I hadn't realised S76 is used for "fire bombing" work but ABC News item on the Korean fires shows one with an underslung bucket:

https://amp.abc.net.au/article/105085856

While power lines appear close to the crash site in several of the available photos in ASN links, if the S76 hit those lines, it would have been very low to sloping ground?

Last edited by helispotter; 26th March 2025 at 23:31. Reason: S76 are being used with bambi buckets...
helispotter is offline  
Reply
Old 27th March 2025 | 09:07
  #9 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
Community Builder
25 Anniversary
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 15,110
Likes: 1,083
From: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Originally Posted by Gordy
Other than providing top cover and IR support, the S-76 has got to be the worst aircraft one would choose for fire fighting........

And a 73 year old pilot-----RIP.
Thirty years ago it was part of my contract to carry out fire bucketing with S-76C. A lot of aircraft for not much water.
ShyTorque is offline  
Reply
Old 27th March 2025 | 14:03
  #10 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 73
From: England
After the AW 139 came on the scene a number of operators dumped the S76 and the 365 from their fleets. Often they went for far less than the value of the components and of course many were broken up for spares.
We sold one 365 for a million euros. Speaking to the buyer he commented that they had just had a quote for 800,000 euros for a gearbox overhaul for one of their fleet.
He was also very surprised by the excellent condition of the aircraft although it was high time.
We were putting aircraft through end of lease and the finance companies were selling them for less than we spent to hand them back.
I think a number of operators bought them to use on the basis that if it breaks we shove it in the corner and cannibalise it.
So some of them finding their way into aerial work makes sense. At the time we said to the company we should buy them off the bank and break them ourselves.
At least we would have broken even at worst.
ericferret is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.