Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Helicentre crash

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Helicentre crash

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th May 2024, 07:20
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: England
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Helicentre crash

Anyone have details on the Helicentre AW109 crash at Oxford yesterday?
XR518 is offline  

Top Answer

20th May 2024, 22:32
highrpm
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: uk
Posts: 13
Received 14 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by helimutt

Seen that look before…


Old 20th May 2024, 08:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 1,662
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Don't quote me because this is, after all, a rumour network. Training accident. Instructor unable to recover a student mistake in time. Hard landing removing the nose wheel from 109S. Aircraft had only apparently been purchased a couple weeks before, which is a real shame. The aircraft was a well maintained well looked after 109.



helimutt is offline  
Old 20th May 2024, 10:29
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,375
Received 684 Likes on 303 Posts
Can't think I'd be doing running landings to a grass field in one of those.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by [email protected]:
Old 20th May 2024, 15:41
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: South West
Posts: 303
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
I reckon a reject from a engine failure pre-TDP and the student lowered the lever then moved the cyclic forward rather than the other way around. I had this mistake demonstrated to me once and you have to be quick to recover it as an instructor - a fortunate demonstration as someone did it to me later.
gipsymagpie is offline  
Old 20th May 2024, 17:38
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 114 Likes on 80 Posts
What is an FOM?
hargreaves99 is offline  
Old 20th May 2024, 18:31
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,966
Received 29 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by hargreaves99
What is an FOM?
Why would you ask?
Bravo73 is online now  
The following 3 users liked this post by Bravo73:
Old 20th May 2024, 18:55
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 528
Received 32 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by hargreaves99
What is an FOM?
Flight Ops Manager, usually the NP FO
helicrazi is online now  
Old 20th May 2024, 19:31
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Bravo73
Why would you ask?
Because another previous post, since removed, used the term without clarifying what it stood for.
farsouth is offline  
Old 20th May 2024, 20:35
  #9 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,609
Received 469 Likes on 248 Posts
That looks like a minor bump but could be a very expensive repair. The floor structure on a 109 adjacent to the nose-wheel is not the strongest design.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 20th May 2024, 22:32
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: uk
Posts: 13
Received 14 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by helimutt

Seen that look before…


highrpm is offline  
The following 10 users liked this post by highrpm:
Old 21st May 2024, 08:14
  #11 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,609
Received 469 Likes on 248 Posts
Originally Posted by gipsymagpie
I reckon a reject from a engine failure pre-TDP and the student lowered the lever then moved the cyclic forward rather than the other way around. I had this mistake demonstrated to me once and you have to be quick to recover it as an instructor - a fortunate demonstration as someone did it to me later.
People do strange things when you sit them in a helicopter and give them two sticks to hold. The only time in my flying career where I was involved in an aircraft damage incident was during an EOL landing in a Gazelle. My student did a very nice autorotation but instead of raising the collective to cushion the touchdown he pulled back hard on the cyclic. Thankfully it only resulted in the requirement for a new frangible skid. Even more fortunate was that 20 minutes later my new squadron boss Cat 3’d his Gazelle just 200 yards away and I gave him a lift back to base!
ShyTorque is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by ShyTorque:
Old 22nd May 2024, 12:32
  #12 (permalink)  
B87
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: .
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The rumour I heard was a practice auto to hover recovery, which was made somewhat harder as the throttles were left at idle...
B87 is offline  
Old 22nd May 2024, 14:14
  #13 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,609
Received 469 Likes on 248 Posts
Oops! Nearly had that happen to me in a Puma HC1. Part of a pilot’s IF check was an entry into autorotation after a double throttle pull. My student, in the right seat, didn’t do very well. He let the Nr drop so low that the alternators tripped off line and the autopilot disconnected as advertised. I had to take control from the resultant, horrendous “UP” he got himself into. As I rolled the aircraft level at about 300 feet agl I heard a single “Beep” from the low Nr warning system. I looked around to confirm that the crewman (who had the responsibility of advancing the throttles) was in the jump seat and was advancing them, only to see his seat empty - he’d strapped into his crash position! The HC1’s Turmo IIIC4 engines’ very poor response from idle was legendary….

My one word, very vulgar response was followed by my right hand and both of the crewman’s hands very rapidly pushing the throttles forwards. We thankfully flew away at around 100’ agl, all of us having learned valuable lessons!
ShyTorque is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 22nd May 2024, 17:15
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: UK
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by B87
The rumour I heard was a practice auto to hover recovery, which was made somewhat harder as the throttles were left at idle...
If this is the case it’s not the first time that sort of incident has happened under Helicentre training, you’d think after having had that issue in a G2 they might have put in some further training or safeguard for the FI’s regarding throttle awareness…
Sofatacos is offline  
Old 22nd May 2024, 21:14
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: South West
Posts: 303
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by B87
The rumour I heard was a practice auto to hover recovery, which was made somewhat harder as the throttles were left at idle...
Double idle PFL are particularly dangerous in the AW109 as the detent between idle and off is push down...the weight of your hand helps do that. It should be lift and turn. I know at least one highly experienced pilot who did that on both engines whilst demonstrating a double idle PFL and it took no less than 2700 ft for the engines to slow sufficiently that the FADEC logic allowed a relight and the engines spooled up enough to climb away. The significant height loss to recover the engines became part of the instructor syllabus in the sim workup.

Unfortunately the behaviour and skills to handle an auto with both engines running is sufficiently different from a genuine PFL that will remain a push to do double idle PFL. The Sesto Calende sim is a pretty good representation of the genuine auto characteristics according to that pilot!
gipsymagpie is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 23rd May 2024, 18:46
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: A very long way North
Posts: 472
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by ShyTorque
Oops! Nearly had that happen to me in a Puma HC1. Part of a pilot’s IF check was an entry into autorotation after a double throttle pull. My student, in the right seat, didn’t do very well. He let the Nr drop so low that the alternators tripped off line and the autopilot disconnected as advertised. I had to take control from the resultant, horrendous “UP” he got himself into. As I rolled the aircraft level at about 300 feet agl I heard a single “Beep” from the low Nr warning system. I looked around to confirm that the crewman (who had the responsibility of advancing the throttles) was in the jump seat and was advancing them, only to see his seat empty - he’d strapped into his crash position! The HC1’s Turmo IIIC4 engines’ very poor response from idle was legendary….

My one word, very vulgar response was followed by my right hand and both of the crewman’s hands very rapidly pushing the throttles forwards. We thankfully flew away at around 100’ agl, all of us having learned valuable lessons!
Sadly an august member of this forum had a very similar experience in a Puma too, realisation kicked in far too low to get the throttles back in time.

And that was the end of double throttle pulls in the Puma.

Tech log entry: aircraft turns over but fails to start….?
PlasticCabDriver is offline  
The following 3 users liked this post by PlasticCabDriver:
Old 23rd May 2024, 20:18
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,328
Received 363 Likes on 204 Posts
Originally Posted by PlasticCabDriver
Sadly an august member of this forum had a very similar experience in a Puma too, realisation kicked in far too low to get the throttles back in time.

And that was the end of double throttle pulls in the Puma.

Tech log entry: aircraft turns over but fails to start….?
Has echoes of Ben Ceaser: https://aviation-safety.net/wikibase/72871
212man is online now  
Old 23rd May 2024, 21:23
  #18 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,609
Received 469 Likes on 248 Posts
It was the aftermath of that tragic, fatal accident that finally prompted the RAF to carry out single engine failure drills in a simulator. An ex Boss of 33 Sqn (who had never been a fan of the way that they had always been done “live”) became promoted high enough to change the policy. Took another few years before it finally happened, though.
ShyTorque is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 24th May 2024, 08:15
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,375
Received 684 Likes on 303 Posts
Must have just been shortcomings with Puma pilots then , double speed select pulls were no problem for Wessex pilots
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 29th May 2024, 21:52
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: Europe
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
**** happens

Fortunately no one was hurt or worse.
FiveBlades is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.