Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Tail Rotor Strike

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Tail Rotor Strike

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26th April 2024 | 13:55
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 921
Likes: 30
From: Europe
Tail Rotor Strike

Once again a pilot has ignored markings, intended to keep the helicopter safe from obstacles, with the obvious consequences. Had the aircraft touched down with the pilot over the TDPC, an expensive incident might have been avoided.

https://www.atsb.gov.au/media/news-i...fer-operations
JimL is offline  
Reply
Old 26th April 2024 | 14:20
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 768
Likes: 45
From: Montreal
Hope the pilot doesn't feel vindicated by the report, somewhere in his training and operational control, where to land on a marked offshore deck seems to have been missed.

Apart from all that, who would ever position the tail over steps leading up to the platform?
malabo is offline  
Reply
Old 26th April 2024 | 14:37
  #3 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 877
From: Canada
Put your butt on the yellow circle!
A common error is for folks to focus upon and aim for the centre of the “H” which leads to both a too shallow approach at at bottom and the tail being too far back.
Focus on the opposite side of the helideck. This should lead to an approach and hover with rotor mast of the helicopter being over the H.
Much better to be a bit too far forward when you can see what obstacles are ahead of you than too far back where you can’t see any obstacles.
On take off folks sometimes focus on a point just in front of the nose. As the helicopter lifts off the point starts to disappear under the nose and they instinctively back up to keep it in sight. Especially at night.
Just my crackpot opinion.
albatross is offline  
Reply
Old 27th April 2024 | 06:19
  #4 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 10,959
Likes: 1,814
From: EGDC
It looks like he put himself in the middle of the circle rather than the middle of the helicopter in the middle of the circle.

Presumably for cost reasons they don't have rearcrew?
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Reply
Old 28th April 2024 | 09:20
  #5 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 880
Likes: 225
From: Australia
It is worth trying to read the full ATSB report on this incident rather than only the summary. Seems lots of elements came into it. Pilots touchdown positioning may have been influenced by marked manholes in the landing zone. I am also left wondering if the stanchions on the side the helicopter approached had accidentally been left in place by the crew on this occassion (despite a request from the marine pilot) given the stanchions on other side had been removed for that landing? Or were stanchions regularly left in place on previous occassions? As for positioning of tail rotor, seems access to the deck hatch could be from either port or starboard side so with a transverse approach the tail rotor would invariably be over either one or the other access steps. Marine pilots would be trained to approach the helicopter from the front. I wonder how many helicopter pilots had been lucky with landing on this ship prior to this incident?
helispotter is offline  
Reply
Old 28th April 2024 | 10:34
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Oz
Second time for that company and second time for that helicopter🤔
GROSSER is offline  
Reply
Old 28th April 2024 | 10:48
  #7 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 880
Likes: 225
From: Australia
Originally Posted by GROSSER
Second time for that company and second time for that helicopter🤔
Does that mean second time VH-RUA had landed on this particular ship? At first I thought you may have meant second time it had been involved in such an incident. ATSB only has this one accident report for the helicopter VH-RUA.
helispotter is offline  
Reply
Old 28th April 2024 | 19:43
  #8 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 888
Likes: 65
From: California
Meh, **** happens. Doc his pay and move on.
Robbiee is offline  
Reply
Old 28th April 2024 | 22:17
  #9 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 56
From: UK
Originally Posted by Robbiee
Meh, **** happens. Doc his pay and move on.
Originally Posted by Robbiee
Anyway, I'm just a bored troll stirring the pot from time to time for his own amusement. I feed on conflict, not compliments.

…………………..

Bravo73 is online now  
Reply
Old 28th April 2024 | 23:53
  #10 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2018
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 888
Likes: 65
From: California
Originally Posted by Bravo73
…………………..
I'm getting a sense of disapproval here.
Robbiee is offline  
Reply
Old 29th April 2024 | 07:04
  #11 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,371
Likes: 926
From: Den Haag
Originally Posted by helispotter
Does that mean second time VH-RUA had landed on this particular ship? At first I thought you may have meant second time it had been involved in such an incident. ATSB only has this one accident report for the helicopter VH-RUA.
I see the see the same registration was involved in an accident when on a Piper PA-28.
212man is online now  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.