Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

R550X

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Jan 2024, 03:18
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Taipei
Posts: 16
Received 8 Likes on 1 Post
R550X

What are your thoughts on this new R550X from Robinson Helicopters?
Un-crewed they say, and some possibilities are
1. Logistics and delivery
2. SAR
3. Precision Agriculture
4. Infrastructure inspection
5. Beyond visual line of sight operations

And are just starting points.

Last edited by Senior Pilot; 27th Feb 2024 at 00:52. Reason: Post in English, thanks
Minquanlu is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2024, 07:10
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: London
Posts: 36
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I’m curious about how insurers will handle it. It seems like there is less jeopardy and therefore more risk taking?
But it seems like a fantastic gadget with obvious use cases
love flying is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2024, 09:50
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
The R550X is _not_ a Robinson product. Rotor Technologies are developing the R550X and it seems they will buy in new R44 airframes from Robinson first. It is thus a Rotor Technologies product

see https://rotor.ai/r550x which includes a list of FAQ at the bottom of that page
helihub is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2024, 10:03
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Great South East, tired and retired
Posts: 4,388
Received 228 Likes on 104 Posts
Why buy it with expensive windows when cheap sheet metal would do the job - nobody needs to see out of it.
Ascend Charlie is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2024, 12:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Somewhere nice
Age: 52
Posts: 233
Received 13 Likes on 5 Posts
Windows (redundant) are off the shelf, replacing them with sheet metal would require a mahoosive english wheel or a hydro-press..

rugmuncher is online now  
Old 31st Jan 2024, 13:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 770
Received 29 Likes on 14 Posts
Interesting! I guess the age of autonomous civilian aircraft has sort of snuck up on us more quickly than we (at least I) imagined. And, being a single guy, I have a pretty fertile imagination ;-) Anyway, there's a company that recently successfully demonstrated a completely unmanned chock-to-chock, short cross-country cargo flight of a Cessna Caravan. Think of a company like FedEx, that utilizes a fleet of Caravans. Imagine a remote pilot sitting in a control center somewhere, who can "fly" a couple of different cargo flights in a couple of different aircraft in a given shift. If I were the CEO of FedEx, I'd be salivating at the thought of being able to cut my pilot staff by some order of magnitude, and not have to worry about whiny pilots complaining that, "The coffee in the FBO pilot lounge was cold and it was crowded and loud and I couldn't get a good nap while I waited for the cargo for my return flight, and oh yeah, I'll be leaving next week because United called and gave me a start date..."

At the same time, it doesn't take too much imagination to come up with uses for a totally autonomous R-44. For instance, take cherry-drying. R-44's are used extensively in that task during the growing season (June through August) in the northwestern U.S. I mean, there's tons of them. It doesn't only rain during daylight hours, and growers would love to be able to dry at night. But aircraft are limited to daylight ops only because it's usually one-pilot-per-ship and humans can't operate 24-7. With these drone R-44's, the remote operators would not necessarily need to be fully-certified helicopter pilots - no need to demonstrate competence in autorotations and cross-country navigation and slope landings. So certification could theoretically be quicker and cheaper. And suddenly there's no need to hire a $300/day "real" pilot to sit around and wait for it to rain. Plus, without an interior (seats, instrument panel, air conditioning and all that stuff), you could rig that thing to carry more fuel and stay up longer, without the need to stop so often for aircraft refueling and silly pilot "physiological" needs like taking a leak and getting lunch.. The grower I worked for always used to roll his eyes when I'd have to stop because my ship only carried 1.5 hours of fuel. Avgas? Feh. Run it on car gas!

The future is here, folks, like it or not.



FH1100 Pilot is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2024, 08:41
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Taipei
Posts: 16
Received 8 Likes on 1 Post
I see. Thanks. So it is not a Robinson after all.
R550X is like a drone. Unmanned. It will definitely compete with drones.
That is a tough competition. A big gamble probably.

What does everyone think?

Minquanlu is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.