Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

Honeywell 660 Radar on 139 specific, and helicopters in general

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

Honeywell 660 Radar on 139 specific, and helicopters in general

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jan 2024, 18:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: CYQS
Age: 49
Posts: 336
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Honeywell 660 Radar on 139 specific, and helicopters in general

So a questions for the experts. We are having a friendly argument about WHY we have the radar on at the least standby when operating the helicopters.

From my own "common wisdom" which isn't very wise I'll admit, we have always left them on because of vibrations damaging the gimbal mounts, and obviously because if you need it, it won't take ages to warm up.

I've searched the books, Honeywell 660 manual, Primus Epic manual, Flight Safety and Leonardo training books, company SOP. Only guidance is company and Flight Safety says ON on checklists...

So to the panel of experts, anybody have a good reference for WHY?

Cheers
Winnie
Winnie is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 01:05
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,947
Received 394 Likes on 209 Posts
On a gin clear day never saw reason to turn it on, interested to see what knowledgeable folk have to say, does the practice cause problems with the system? Didn't seem to in as much as we never had radar problems, iron gyros were another matter which were replaced with solid state.
megan is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 02:46
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: South East Asia
Age: 54
Posts: 321
Received 32 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by megan
interested to see what knowledgeable folk have to say
Unknowledgeable folk here... just experienced with complex systems those many components have convoluted interactions.
Sometime its interesting what a sub-system those functionality is far removed can create such an unforeseable implication.
it would be likely that the aircraft is tested and qualified with all system on. testing with partial system off is probably an area that receive less attention.
Agile is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 07:18
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,121
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Winnie
Only guidance is company and Flight Safety says ON on checklists...

So to the panel of experts, anybody have a good reference for WHY?

Cheers
Winnie
no expert but my impression would be in SOP is to have an ON/OFF option you’d then have to give further consideration to what equals ON or OFF, serviceability and if OFF when it becomes ON. If there is no life limit issues then I suspect easier to leave on.
Pittsextra is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 09:17
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,332
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
Scanner stability would be my suggestion - keep it powered up to stop it flopping around and getting damaged.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 09:47
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Berwick-upon-Tweed
Posts: 83
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree. If the system is powered, the antenna is kept in place and stable so no risk of damage to components, which there might be is the system was unpowered. Also, why go to the bother of having a radar and not using it?
steve_oc is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 14:26
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: yes
Posts: 370
Received 20 Likes on 13 Posts
You might be looking in the wrong location.

Does the fire department only test hydrants just before a fire?

My guess would be that the aircraft was tested and certified in that configuration. And it’s an installed system, so why wouldn’t be on?

FWIW, FAR part 135.175 (for large transports) requires it to be operational when detectable weather is reported. If it's not on, how does one know it's operational?
JimEli is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 15:45
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: N/A
Posts: 5,947
Received 394 Likes on 209 Posts
why go to the bother of having a radar and not using it
Using it for what on a gin clear day? Besides, we only flew VMC, cough. CP did show he was able to play Pac Man on the glass screen - something computer programmers call an "Easter Egg", where the Egg had been laid in the aircrafts systems not known (S-76C).
megan is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 15:57
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,332
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
Honeywell specifies it is s stabilised antenna on this family of radars so without power, there is no stabilisation of the antenna and it will flop around on its gimbals.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 17:12
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: After all, what’s more important than proving to someone on the internet that they’re wrong? - Manson
Posts: 1,849
Received 56 Likes on 37 Posts
Honeywell specifies it is s stabilised antenna on this family of radars so without power, there is no stabilisation of the antenna and it will flop around on its gimbals.
Maybe? According to an article from the manufacturer - The Use, And Misuse Of Weather Radar – Part 4

Honeywell Primus 880/660/440, Bendix King RDR-2000/2060/2100 and the Honeywell RDR-4000 and RDR-7000 systems. All of the radars just listed “except the RDR-4000” use stepper motors and it is safe to turn power off during taxi or any other phase of flight.
Stephen D. Hammack
Test Pilot, Flight Technical Services
Honeywell Aerospace Technologies
RVDT is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 17:42
  #11 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,576
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
I got into the habit of leaving the radar on STBY so it came on as the relevant bus bar came on line. I was advised that ground taxying could be quite harmful if the unit was left unpowered.
ShyTorque is online now  
Old 22nd Jan 2024, 17:53
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: N/A
Age: 47
Posts: 150
Received 27 Likes on 11 Posts
In Helionix equipped aircraft it will actually fail the automatic Pre-flight check which also checks the avionics including WX radar if installed.
casper64 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 23rd Jan 2024, 01:13
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: CYQS
Age: 49
Posts: 336
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Well it DOES talk to the MAU, so I suppose it is wise to keep on because of that too...
Cheers all!
Winnie is offline  
Old 23rd Jan 2024, 11:14
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,332
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
Originally Posted by RVDT
Maybe? According to an article from the manufacturer - The Use, And Misuse Of Weather Radar – Part 4



Stephen D. Hammack
Test Pilot, Flight Technical Services
Honeywell Aerospace Technologies
Nice one RVDT - can't argue with the horse's mouth
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
The following users liked this post:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.