Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

S92 vs bridge, bridge wins

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

S92 vs bridge, bridge wins

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Sep 2023, 18:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 514
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts
S92 vs bridge, bridge wins

S92 vs Bridge


DENHAM SPRINGS - A vehicle towing a helicopter got stuck under the Range Avenue overpass Friday morning when the helicopter jammed.

Photos showed the helicopter on top of a towing trailer wedged under the overpass itself. It appeared the craft's rotor collided with a support beam on the underside of the bridge.

The Department of Transportation examined the overpass' structure and did not anticipate any shutdowns would be necessary. The Livingston Parish Sheriff's Office was also on scene working to resolve the situation.

Range Avenue was fully reopened shortly after 10:30 a.m. after the helicopter was removed. DOTD says there is no indication the bridge sustained any structural damage at that the interstate would not be impacted.

While officials have not released details on the aircraft involved, it appeared to resemble a Sikorsky S-92. Fresh from the production line, the helicopter goes for nearly $30 million.
It's unclear where the aircraft was heading or whether the driver will be ticketed for the crash.




Last edited by Senior Pilot; 22nd Sep 2023 at 19:10. Reason: Add quote; it helps Rotorheads know what the thread is about
helicrazi is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by helicrazi:
Old 22nd Sep 2023, 18:34
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ouch!! Worlds fastest MGB removal! That’s a write off I’d say! Bits of frame attached to the box still. Would be good to see with the covers off.

Last edited by tonkaplonka; 22nd Sep 2023 at 19:56.
tonkaplonka is offline  
Old 22nd Sep 2023, 20:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 516 Likes on 215 Posts
There shall be an interesting back story to this event.

Transporting oversized loads is a very common practice done every day for all sorts of items.

There is a thing called a load stick.....that Drivers use to measure the vertical height of the loaded trailer.

Oversized loads (in most States) require a permit from the State that sets forth the exact route the Trucker is to follow, and all of the bridges have a Standard (and measured height).

The State's that do. not specify the route do declare what minimum heights for particular roadways are....and the Trucker. has to carefully choose his route.

All that being said...road way surface and any loading of the bridge structure such as a train can make a critical difference when there is scant clearance....sometimes you have to reduce tire pressure to make it under.

Some insurance company is going to be investigating this event very carefully looking for a way out.

The first photo in this article is pretty suggestive of the damage.

https://www.wafb.com/2023/09/22/offi...nes-back-open/
SASless is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 22nd Sep 2023, 20:50
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,263
Received 336 Likes on 188 Posts
Originally Posted by tonkaplonka
Ouch!! Worlds fastest MGB removal! That’s a write off I’d say! Bits of frame attached to the box still. Would be good to see with the covers off.
Yep - got to be a write off!
212man is online now  
Old 22nd Sep 2023, 20:58
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 861
Received 212 Likes on 117 Posts
Odd - Google maps clearly shows a 15' sign on the bridge for the opposite side lanes exactly where the unpainted spot is above the helicopter.

https://www.google.com/maps/@30.4544...8192?entry=ttu




Shame on the driver or dispatcher for not checking the route - there are maps, but someone took down a critical warning sign.

The state DoT has been very very bad for a long time. It was there during construction in 2011, but gone by 2015.
MechEngr is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2023, 01:06
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,418
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
You're assuming the driver was on his approved route.
A little over 40 years ago, GE was shipping one of the calibrated and fully instrumented CF6-80A engines going to be installed on the first GE powered 767-200.
The driver took a little detour from the approved route so he could 'visit' his lady friend. Sure enough, he hit a overpass with that multi-million dollar CF6 engine.
Quite a bit of scrambling to get another engine instrumented and calibrated to support the 767 flight test program.
Never heard what happened to the truck driver, although I suspect he had to find a new profession... Writing off a multi-million dollar aircraft engine tends to do nasty things to your insurance rates.

Last edited by tdracer; 23rd Sep 2023 at 01:27.
tdracer is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 23rd Sep 2023, 01:17
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: southern half
Age: 37
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I find it incredible that having a $10m load on the back (or any load for that matter) that this could happen. I would have wing walkers at every overpass..even knowing it will fit. "...umm, I'm not sure. Stopping" Amazing.
Unregistered_ is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2023, 03:21
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Here
Posts: 963
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
If it bleeds, it leads.


jimjim1 is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2023, 03:24
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Australia
Age: 60
Posts: 341
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Blue paint job , looks to be a Bristow machine with a lump of the fwd main beam still attached to the MGB, alloy main beam so pre S/N 244, won't need to do 150 hrly insp now, should help a little with parts shortages .

Last edited by Blackhawk9; 23rd Sep 2023 at 05:33.
Blackhawk9 is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 23rd Sep 2023, 07:32
  #10 (permalink)  
Ecce Homo! Loquitur...
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Peripatetic
Posts: 17,430
Received 1,594 Likes on 731 Posts

ORAC is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2023, 09:34
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
MechEngr - check the press images (eg the town mane in the green sign) and you’ll find it was travelling under the bridge from the opposite direction, where there is no height restriction sign on GSV (interesting from a potential court case point of view)

Also, another airframe waiting on an S92 rotor head, potentially- but the airframe damage may ace that in the insurance assessment as suggested in other posts


Originally Posted by MechEngr
Odd - Google maps clearly shows a 15' sign on the bridge for the opposite side lanes exactly where the unpainted spot is above the helicopter.

https://www.google.com/maps/@30.4544...8192?entry=ttu




Shame on the driver or dispatcher for not checking the route - there are maps, but someone took down a critical warning sign.

The state DoT has been very very bad for a long time. It was there during construction in 2011, but gone by 2015.
helihub is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2023, 09:37
  #12 (permalink)  

Gentleman Aviator
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Teetering Towers - somewhere in the Shires
Age: 74
Posts: 3,698
Received 51 Likes on 24 Posts
"It'll buff out Sir and do a trip...."
teeteringhead is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2023, 09:38
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Lost again...
Posts: 901
Received 120 Likes on 55 Posts
It amazes me that in this day and age there is not a radar sensor (akin to a parking sensor) on the top of all trucks , buses etc that scans ahead and shrieks if it sees a height hazard (in the case of a truck it would need to be programmed with the height of the load obviously).

Similarly - I'm surprised that bridges that have been hit multiple times are not fitted with a similar system that would flash big red lights and klaxons if it sees something too big coming towards it.


OvertHawk is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2023, 09:58
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: South
Age: 62
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Although a lot of S-92's seem to get transported by road all the time, by coincidence the oldest production example (G-VIND 92006) has recently been deregistered and exported to USA!

It is a rumour network after all....
BTC8183 is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2023, 10:48
  #15 (permalink)  
gsa
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wensleydale.
Posts: 127
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by OvertHawk
It amazes me that in this day and age there is not a radar sensor (akin to a parking sensor) on the top of all trucks , buses etc that scans ahead and shrieks if it sees a height hazard (in the case of a truck it would need to be programmed with the height of the load obviously).

Similarly - I'm surprised that bridges that have been hit multiple times are not fitted with a similar system that would flash big red lights and klaxons if it sees something too big coming towards it.
A good truck satnav will do it all for you, you just need to be bright enough to measure the height of the load and put it in.
gsa is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2023, 11:18
  #16 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 514
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by BTC8183
Although a lot of S-92's seem to get transported by road all the time, by coincidence the oldest production example (G-VIND 92006) has recently been deregistered and exported to USA!

It is a rumour network after all....
Real shame if its VIND, thats no way to retire
helicrazi is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2023, 12:19
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: UK
Posts: 2,960
Received 24 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Blackhawk9
Blue paint job , looks to be a Bristow machine
Originally Posted by BTC8183
by coincidence the oldest production example (G-VIND 92006) has recently been deregistered and exported to USA!
Originally Posted by helicrazi
Real shame if its VIND, thats no way to retire

The Avincis paint jobs were primarily blue, with white and gold details, weren’t they?
Bravo73 is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2023, 13:43
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 753
Received 24 Likes on 19 Posts
The rumor is the truck was not on its approved route. And given its itinerary maybe the driver stopped for an unscheduled pit-stop? The other rumor is it was on its way to have work done at a shop in LFT. Whether it was 92006 don't know. But if it is then its more a homecoming as 92006 was the launch S/N and started life as N192PH. Ironically it spent months in the hangar years ago for a non-standard repair after it caught fire on the ground and melted most of the control quadrant on the roof. Never thought it would fly after that one. Will be interesting to see how it fares after this one.
wrench1 is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2023, 13:44
  #19 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 514
Received 21 Likes on 14 Posts
Originally Posted by Bravo73
The Avincis paint jobs were primarily blue, with white and gold details, weren’t they?
Yes, ND:


helicrazi is offline  
Old 23rd Sep 2023, 14:11
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,263
Received 336 Likes on 188 Posts
Originally Posted by wrench1
The rumor is the truck was not on its approved route. And given its itinerary maybe the driver stopped for an unscheduled pit-stop? The other rumor is it was on its way to have work done at a shop in LFT. Whether it was 92006 don't know. But if it is then its more a homecoming as 92006 was the launch S/N and started life as N192PH. Ironically it spent months in the hangar years ago for a non-standard repair after it caught fire on the ground and melted most of the control quadrant on the roof. Never thought it would fly after that one. Will be interesting to see how it fares after this one.
it also silent a lot of time in the hangar after delivery, as the PR value of announcing first delivery outweighed the fact it wasn’t operationally ready! In reality, 92007 (G-LAWX) was the first in service.
212man is online now  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.