Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

407 and drone close call

Wikiposts
Search
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

407 and drone close call

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Sep 2023, 19:08
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Beyond the black stump!
Posts: 1,419
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
407 and drone close call

Check out this video! https://unofficialnetworks.com/2023/...ter-near-miss/
Cyclic Hotline is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2023, 19:33
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 864
Received 214 Likes on 118 Posts
Video is 5 years old; no follow-up report even though the helicopter is distinctive and easily traced. It appears to be faked from some flight simulator software.

MechEngr is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2023, 20:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is definetly not a simulator
helithree is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2023, 23:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: The Wild West... and Oz
Posts: 866
Received 9 Likes on 2 Posts
Wink

Direction of blade rotation...
BigMike is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2023, 01:16
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 864
Received 214 Likes on 118 Posts
No shadow of helicopter on ocean/shallows; lack of exhaust heat distortion/shimmer that would be nearly head on; given the use of a wide-angle lens for the copter to appear that large it would be within a few feet, but the "drone" is unperturbed by what should be a violent downwash flow.

-and -

The helicopter company would have taken 30 minutes or less for a news agency and the FAA to identify, followed by at least trying to interview the pilot or go to the owner.

It is possible the helicopter is extracted from a flight simulator and is composited with real footage from an over-height flight, but I remain confident this encounter didn't happen.
MechEngr is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2023, 08:19
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In 30 fps videos the 4-bladed rotors usually appear turning the opposite direction...
helithree is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2023, 15:51
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,266
Received 336 Likes on 188 Posts
Originally Posted by helithree
In 30 fps videos the 4-bladed rotors usually appear turning the opposite direction...
Exactly - discussing blade turning direction is a complete red herring! Even going back years we see movies with stage coach, trains and vehicle wheels going backwards. Videos of the EC155 online, with the Nr selected to Hi (vertical take off and landings) show the blades completely stationary! In this example we see them going backwards and forwards and stationary, at different rpms:
)
212man is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by 212man:
Old 16th Sep 2023, 11:39
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 310
Received 42 Likes on 34 Posts
While the scenario is totally credible, I am inclined to agree with MechEngr that this video is a fake. My reasoning is different: I looked at a few frames where the '407' was close to the drone and some of the elements of the helicopter drop out such as the right skid and parts of the cross tubes. In the comments on the YouTube video one person puts this down to what happens when a video is re-rendered (presumably when posted to YouTube) but I am doubtful. Others had commented on YouTube about lack of any sign of pilots on board, and I also don't see any clear signs of anyone on board as it passes.

Initially I thought the helicopter had too much sideslip as it was approaching but I realised this could be due to the relative view from a drone moving out to sea (as it apparently was) on a near collision course. I initially also thought the helicopter couldn't be seen when the drone camera panned around but in fact it can be seen and is roughly the size it would be expected to be once it comes back into view, so I can't fault that. Like MechEngr, others on YouTube have also commented about the lack of reaction of the drone to the downwash from the passing rotor, but I wonder how strong the downwash would be from a fast moving helicopter for a drone that was already to one side of the helicopter path?

There is some sort of 'registration' on the cowling but I couldn't read it. I tried to Google search on the internet for a Bell 407 with such a paint scheme but without luck. But as MechEngr says, if this was real, wouldn't the identity of the helicopter and its pilot(s) have been resolved way back in August 2018. And how did the drone footage make its way from the drone operator to CBS Miami? In a plain brown envelope perhaps? All seems a bit suspect.


No obvious sign of any pilots as it passes.

A screenshot where right skid is 'missing'
helispotter is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2023, 15:07
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,266
Received 336 Likes on 188 Posts
Well, in other frames the right skid is visible! Also, the title of the news article says that the FAA is investigating the incident!

I don’t know why everyone jumps on the ‘fake’ bandwagon as a default position. It’s not even a particularly unusual video and is totally plausible.
212man is offline  
The following users liked this post:
Old 16th Sep 2023, 15:45
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: same planet as yours
Posts: 551
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by 212man
Also, the title of the news article says that the FAA is investigating the incident!
You are referring to a 5 year old news article https://www.cbsnews.com/miami/news/h...off-hollywood/
Did you see any FAA reports published on this matter in the meantime??

DIBO is offline  
Old 16th Sep 2023, 16:31
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,266
Received 336 Likes on 188 Posts
Originally Posted by DIBO
You are referring to a 5 year old news article https://www.cbsnews.com/miami/news/h...off-hollywood/
Did you see any FAA reports published on this matter in the meantime??
I know it’s not current - I can read! No idea about any reports as I did not look for them. I don’t even know if they’d be public in this kind of investigation.
212man is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2023, 06:22
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,332
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
Well, in other frames the right skid is visible!
I think that was the point, if it were real then the skid would be there in every frame but if it is software generated it could just be a coding error or glitch which only shows up occasionally.

Equally it could be real and the skid is in an area where the camera's software fills in the gaps to save computing power and memory.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2023, 06:51
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 864
Received 214 Likes on 118 Posts
Until there are Artificial Intelligence cameras, deciding the skid was an extraneous detail isn't something a camera can do, even to save memory. Doing so would take a large amount of computing effort.

Extracting a blurred helicopter from a video game or flight simulator backdrop and, from that, losing small details is expected for current low-cost editing software.

If this had happened it would be the banner for the useless garbage RFID the FAA has failed so miserably with.
MechEngr is offline  
Old 17th Sep 2023, 10:17
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Australia
Age: 58
Posts: 310
Received 42 Likes on 34 Posts
Originally Posted by 212man
...I don’t know why everyone jumps on the ‘fake’ bandwagon as a default position. It’s not even a particularly unusual video and is totally plausible.
I did also start my comment that the scenario was credible. I have shared links to several video clips on this forum where I didn't for a second imagine they were fake, so it is hardly my default position. Just in this case I felt it may be mocked-up. Personally, I would be interested to know if it was real or simulated and if the latter, I would give the person who did it a pat on the back for a job well done!
helispotter is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2023, 06:55
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: EGDC
Posts: 10,332
Received 623 Likes on 271 Posts
Until there are Artificial Intelligence cameras, deciding the skid was an extraneous detail isn't something a camera can do, even to save memory. Doing so would take a large amount of computing effort.
As I understand it, that is what cameras like the go pro 360 do already.
crab@SAAvn.co.uk is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2023, 13:07
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Hedge
Posts: 227
Received 23 Likes on 6 Posts
I believe we we are all in a simulation.

My back and neck argues against it though....

3rd G&T on the table.



Salusa is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2023, 13:37
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Location: UK
Posts: 100
Received 50 Likes on 28 Posts
Originally Posted by MechEngr
No shadow of helicopter on ocean/shallows; lack of exhaust heat distortion/shimmer that would be nearly head on; given the use of a wide-angle lens for the copter to appear that large it would be within a few feet, but the "drone" is unperturbed by what should be a violent downwash flow.

-and -

The helicopter company would have taken 30 minutes or less for a news agency and the FAA to identify, followed by at least trying to interview the pilot or go to the owner.

It is possible the helicopter is extracted from a flight simulator and is composited with real footage from an over-height flight, but I remain confident this encounter didn't happen.
There is a shadow in the shallows in front and to the right of the approaching helicopter. However it just highlights that the moving parts of the video appear "jerky" at this point and not smooth, while the camera seems to be able to pan smoothly at the same time.
Ohrly is offline  
Old 18th Sep 2023, 15:12
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Den Haag
Age: 57
Posts: 6,266
Received 336 Likes on 188 Posts
Talking of 'shadows' I suspect that considering the colour scheme, lack of registration markings, and the sensor mounted on the nose, that maybe the 407 belongs to an organisation that does not like publicity!
212man is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2023, 12:29
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: LONDON
Posts: 202
Received 21 Likes on 12 Posts
Originally Posted by [email protected]
As I understand it, that is what cameras like the go pro 360 do already.
Not really. They delete static elements (eg the camera support) from the image and fill in the picture behind using footage from a separate lens, much like how we avoid seeing our own nose most of the time.

netstruggler is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2023, 16:13
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,752
Received 156 Likes on 78 Posts
Could we all just agree that flying a drone where you should not is a bad thing?
albatross is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by albatross:


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.