Austrian AW169M LUH delivered
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,536
Likes: 295
From: The Alps
Austrian AW169M LUH delivered
First of 18 x Leonardo AW169M LUH for the Austrian Bundesheer was delivered today. a lot ohr program is done in conjunction with the Italian Ministry of Defence Armaments Procurement.
f
cheers
f
cheers
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 47
Likes: 24
From: New York
Skids are for kids
Seeing skids on the AW169 will take a while to get used to.
Also, interesting mod on the horizontal stabilizers. Anyone know if that has to do with the lack of the wheel type landing gear?
https://www.austrianwings.info/2022/...rst-brumwoski/
Also, interesting mod on the horizontal stabilizers. Anyone know if that has to do with the lack of the wheel type landing gear?
https://www.austrianwings.info/2022/...rst-brumwoski/
Last edited by verticalspin; 23rd December 2022 at 04:12. Reason: Added URL
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 34
Likes: 5
From: nj
I know the Austrian military uses the Bell 212 or AB212, the Sikorsky UH-60, and now theyve ordered about 30-plus of the AW169. I dont get it, all of these three models are in the same size class; the Bell 212 and UH-60 are designed for military applications - the Bell has a large sliding door with room for a gunner (I know it's an older copter and is being supplanted by the UH60 and AW169) and the UH-60 has a dedicated part of the cabin for a gunner. The AW169 is basically a civilian helicopter shuttling people around, like for EMS for oil & gas and executive duties. The 169 has a somewhat shorter door than the 212 or 60, and can carry 8-10 troops, with a gunner that would occupy lots of door space.
Why did Austria go with the AW169, and not the AW149 (with a door gunner window/area) or just buy more UH60s? Is the AW169 going to fill non-combat military duties?
Why did Austria go with the AW169, and not the AW149 (with a door gunner window/area) or just buy more UH60s? Is the AW169 going to fill non-combat military duties?
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 646
Likes: 18
From: Europe
The 169 is a replacement for the alouette. Also for the 212 the 169 will be a logical “silent” replacement, after a recent avionics “upgrade” fail. It’s a LUH, but more than the 212 in every aspect.
A door gunner is not mandatory in Europe I guess, so not every helicopter is worked around it. By the looks of the US LUH (145) neither is there, with a tiny sliding door.
A door gunner is not mandatory in Europe I guess, so not every helicopter is worked around it. By the looks of the US LUH (145) neither is there, with a tiny sliding door.
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,536
Likes: 295
From: The Alps
I know the Austrian military uses the Bell 212 or AB212, the Sikorsky UH-60, and now theyve ordered about 30-plus of the AW169. I dont get it, all of these three models are in the same size class; the Bell 212 and UH-60 are designed for military applications - the Bell has a large sliding door with room for a gunner (I know it's an older copter and is being supplanted by the UH60 and AW169) and the UH-60 has a dedicated part of the cabin for a gunner. The AW169 is basically a civilian helicopter shuttling people around, like for EMS for oil & gas and executive duties. The 169 has a somewhat shorter door than the 212 or 60, and can carry 8-10 troops, with a gunner that would occupy lots of door space.
Why did Austria go with the AW169, and not the AW149 (with a door gunner window/area) or just buy more UH60s? Is the AW169 going to fill non-combat military duties?
Why did Austria go with the AW169, and not the AW149 (with a door gunner window/area) or just buy more UH60s? Is the AW169 going to fill non-combat military duties?
they also operate the Bell OH-58C Kiowa and my photos from AirPower
And that used for training as well as light observation / gunship role.
cheers
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,536
Likes: 295
From: The Alps
The 169 is a replacement for the alouette. Also for the 212 the 169 will be a logical “silent” replacement, after a recent avionics “upgrade” fail. It’s a LUH, but more than the 212 in every aspect.
A door gunner is not mandatory in Europe I guess, so not every helicopter is worked around it. By the looks of the US LUH (145) neither is there, with a tiny sliding door.
A door gunner is not mandatory in Europe I guess, so not every helicopter is worked around it. By the looks of the US LUH (145) neither is there, with a tiny sliding door.
cheers
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 173
Likes: 20
From: The 4th dimentia.....
Wait to see what the serviceability is like. If U.K. vip and hems airframes are anything to go by…. 
I can’t see the culture in Austria accepting sub standard rates. But then maybe that’s why instead of open competition it was a gov to gov deal otherwise would anyone have bought it outside of the home nation? Some small but also big shoes to fill.
How long before the Bundesheer decide more Blackhawks would have better replaced the 212’s. They’ve had such success with them and even upgraded them.
it’s akin to someone taking our lovely 175’s up north and selling to a military force somewhere. Just ask why the French have introduced almost all Airbus types into their military and para public fleets, but not the 175.
I can’t see the culture in Austria accepting sub standard rates. But then maybe that’s why instead of open competition it was a gov to gov deal otherwise would anyone have bought it outside of the home nation? Some small but also big shoes to fill.
How long before the Bundesheer decide more Blackhawks would have better replaced the 212’s. They’ve had such success with them and even upgraded them.
it’s akin to someone taking our lovely 175’s up north and selling to a military force somewhere. Just ask why the French have introduced almost all Airbus types into their military and para public fleets, but not the 175.
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,536
Likes: 295
From: The Alps
The 169 is a replacement for the alouette. Also for the 212 the 169 will be a logical “silent” replacement, after a recent avionics “upgrade” fail. It’s a LUH, but more than the 212 in every aspect.
A door gunner is not mandatory in Europe I guess, so not every helicopter is worked around it. By the looks of the US LUH (145) neither is there, with a tiny sliding door.
A door gunner is not mandatory in Europe I guess, so not every helicopter is worked around it. By the looks of the US LUH (145) neither is there, with a tiny sliding door.
Btw said Ab-212 pilot was coming to RAF Linton-on-Ouse for the EDA Helicopter Tactics Course week after the show finished...
cheers
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 40
Likes: 4
From: Underground
Wait to see what the serviceability is like. If U.K. vip and hems airframes are anything to go by….
I can’t see the culture in Austria accepting sub standard rates. But then maybe that’s why instead of open competition it was a gov to gov deal otherwise would anyone have bought it outside of the home nation? Some small but also big shoes to fill.
How long before the Bundesheer decide more Blackhawks would have better replaced the 212’s. They’ve had such success with them and even upgraded them.
it’s akin to someone taking our lovely 175’s up north and selling to a military force somewhere. Just ask why the French have introduced almost all Airbus types into their military and para public fleets, but not the 175.
I can’t see the culture in Austria accepting sub standard rates. But then maybe that’s why instead of open competition it was a gov to gov deal otherwise would anyone have bought it outside of the home nation? Some small but also big shoes to fill.
How long before the Bundesheer decide more Blackhawks would have better replaced the 212’s. They’ve had such success with them and even upgraded them.
it’s akin to someone taking our lovely 175’s up north and selling to a military force somewhere. Just ask why the French have introduced almost all Airbus types into their military and para public fleets, but not the 175.
The spanky new ones coming out are doing really well, very little down time in comparison. Like any type, there’s nothing better than maturing.
Damper links still go all the time but a lateral wiggle between the blades during the preflight will easily pick up a link about to go. If you can feel it then the link probably has 5-10hrs left on it and engineers are so used to changing them now it can be done in less than an hour.
Joined: Jul 2002
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 3,054
Likes: 57
From: UK