Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Rotorheads
Reload this Page >

End of the 76?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Rotorheads A haven for helicopter professionals to discuss the things that affect them

End of the 76?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th March 2022 | 10:25
  #21 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 541
From: Lost again...
Originally Posted by albatross
I could never figure out why it had retractable gear. Fixed gear with and strut fairings would have saved all those hydraulics and allowed space for more fuel.
!”
And you would have used up all that extra fuel dragging the gear around.
OvertHawk is offline  
Reply
Old 18th March 2022 | 10:43
  #22 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,581
Likes: 73
From: England
We have a number of pilots who flew the S76 and now fly the 139.

Quote "I would sooner retire than get back in an S76"

Time has moved on.

Similar quotes from the maintenance guys as well, although with more colourful language!!
ericferret is offline  
Reply
Old 18th March 2022 | 11:49
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Aviation Qualifications: Military
Posts: 6,562
Likes: 952
From: Aus
"I would sooner retire than get back in an S76"

Time has moved on
That's what happens with the passing of time, retired 2004 with 12,000 on the 76 and must say I enjoyed most of it, save for an engine failure at CDP on a rig take off. The airlines no longer fly DC-3 on domestic, or DC-7 and Constellations on international routes, something called progress I'm told. Having said that, would love to see how a 139 goes, did a feasibility study on the machine as a fleet replacement prior to retirement, years later that's what they purchased.
megan is offline  
Reply
Old 19th March 2022 | 03:22
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
From: LOS
S76.....Igor's bastard child
Outwest is offline  
Reply
Old 25th March 2022 | 06:00
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 45
Likes: 6
From: Canada
I just read that Pawan Hans will lease 6x S-76D‘s from aircraft leasing company Milestone.
unknown.mp3 is offline  
Reply
Old 25th March 2022 | 17:04
  #26 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 768
Likes: 45
From: Montreal
Flew 139 for years, with tight economics they fell back out of favour and it was back to a 76 C+, C++, B. Preferred the updated avionics of the 76 to the high alt jet Honeywell in the 139. But that was for non-SAR work. 76 was aimed at the corporate market, industry used it for everything else 'cause it was cheap and survived relatively well in remote environments. Some pilots I flew with wouldn't shut down the 139 anywhere there wasn't a battery cart, the 76 didn't know what a battery cart was.
Never flew the D but it still seemed stuck on the US eastern seaboard corporate world without the utility of either the C++ or the 139.
malabo is offline  
Reply
Old 26th March 2022 | 16:53
  #27 (permalink)  
Community Builder
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL(H)
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 877
From: Canada
Originally Posted by OvertHawk
And you would have used up all that extra fuel dragging the gear around.
With fairings and no gear doors flapping in the wind I don’t think your speed would be much lower.
Fixed gear also allow operators to install larger wheels and tires if desired. They would have been very useful in some Air Ambulance operations.
Just a though and now, perhaps, very much a moot point.
albatross is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.